CORE
CO
nnecting
RE
positories
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Research partnership
About
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Community governance
Governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
Innovations
Our research
Labs
research
Modelling stressors on the eelgrass recovery process in two Danish estuaries
Authors
Paula Canal-Vergés
Mogens R. Flindt
Kadri Kuusemäe
Erik Kock Rasmussen
Publication date
1 January 2016
Publisher
'Elsevier BV'
Doi
Cite
Abstract
Eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) depth limit is used as an environmental indicator in Danish coastal waters in the Water Framework Directive (WFD) to evaluate coastal waters and their ecological condition. Even after decades of reduced nutrient loadings the reestablishment of eelgrass has not yet succeeded. The mechanisms hindering/delaying eelgrass recovery were recently identified: 1) lack of sediment anchoring capacity, 2) resuspension created by drifting ephemeral macroalgae, 3) seedling uprooting created by current and wave forces, 4) ballistic stress from attached macroalgae and 5) burial of seeds and seedlings by lugworms. These processes were quantified and introduced to an ecological MIKE 3D model. The developed model was calibrated and validated on two Danish estuaries, Odense Fjord and Roskilde Fjord. Analyses of the simulations were performed on area distribution maps. The parameterized stressors impact has been investigated over a three-year period.The results indicate accumulated effects from multiple stressors weakening the capability of eelgrass to recolonize. Combining all stressors in the model decreased the total area covered by eelgrass 83.72% in Odense Fjord and 80.30% in Roskilde Fjord compared to simulation without stressors. Eelgrass peak biomass declined in both fjords from 33.4 to 4.55 ton C km-2 in Odense Fjord and from 24.42 to 5.58 ton C km-2 in Roskilde Fjord. Combining lugworm burial of seeds and seedlings with resuspension from macroalgae and wave forcing had the second strongest negative impact on eelgrass growth, area reduction of 78.31% and 73.14% in Odense and Roskilde Fjord was seen. Ballistic stress from attached macroalgae also reduced growth drastically. Light conditions, sediment organic content along with shear stress at the sediment surface impact the ability of eelgrass to cope with above mentioned stressors. The spatial resolution of the model setup made it possible to generate maps where eelgrass is exposed to lowest stress, revealing areas for potential eelgrass recovery. The developed eelgrass model is now used as a national tool to predict areas where eelgrass restoration effort may be initiated. © 2016 Elsevier B.V
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
Syddansk Universitets Forskerportal
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:sdu.dk:publications/ebd00f...
Last time updated on 17/11/2024
Crossref
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ecolmodel...
Last time updated on 01/04/2019
Online Research Database In Technology
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:pure.atira.dk:publications...
Last time updated on 03/08/2016
Syddansk Universitets Forskerportal
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:sdu.dk:openaire_cris_publi...
Last time updated on 17/11/2024