Objective: The aim of the present study was to explore whether individual
characteristics such as age, education, vocabulary, and baseline performance
in a working memory (WM) task\u2014similar to the one used in the training
(criterion task)\u2014predict the short- and long-term specific gains and transfer effects of
a verbal WM training for older adults.
Method: Four studies that adopted the Borella et al. (2010) verbal WM training
procedure were found eligible for our analysis as they included: healthy older adults
who attended either the training sessions (WM training group), or alternative activities
(active control group); the same measures for assessing specific gains (on the criterion
WM task), and transfer effects (nearest on a visuo-spatial WM task, near on short-term
memory tasks and far on a measure of fluid intelligence, a measure of processing speed
and two inhibitory measures); and a follow-up session.
Results: Linear mixed models confirmed the overall efficacy of the training, in the
short-term at least, and some maintenance effects. In the trained group, the individual
characteristics considered were found to contribute (albeit only modestly in some cases)
to explaining the effects of the training.
Conclusions: Overall, our findings suggest the importance of taking individual
characteristics and individual differences into account when examining WMtraining gains
in older adults