open4siThis article systematically reviews the methodological characteristics of Hermeneutic Single Case Efficacy
Design (HSCED) studies published in peer-reviewed journals. HSCED provides researchers with a
flexible and viable alternative to both between-groups and within-subject experimental designs. This article
includes a description of the evolution of the methodology distinctive to HSCED; a discussion of results
of HSCED studies considered within a framework of contemporary standards and guidelines for systematic
case study research; a presentation of recommendations for key characteristics (e.g., diagnosis,
hermeneutic analysis, adjudication procedure). Overall, the aim is provide researchers and reviewers with
a resource for conducting and evaluating HSCED research. The results of a systematic review of 13 studies
suggests that published HSCED research meets contemporary criteria for systematic case study research.
Hermeneutic analysis and adjudication emerged as areas of HSCED practice characterized by a
diversity of procedures. Although consensus exists along key dimensions of HSCED, there remains a need
for further evaluation of adjudication procedures and reporting standards.openBenelli, Enrico; De Carlo, Alessandro; Biffi, Diana; Mcleod, JohnBenelli, Enrico; De Carlo, Alessandro; Biffi, Diana; Mcleod, Joh
