Cataloged from PDF version of article.Ru(NO)(N0&/Si02 catalyst precursors were characterized via XPS and in-situ reflectance IR spectroscopy before, during
and after reduction by hydrogen over the temperature range 300-800 K. IR results indicated that the catalyst precursor lost NO3
groups first, with subsequent loss of NO both in a reducing atmosphere and during thermal annealing. XPS was used to derive
information on the oxidation state of Ru in the various steps of the annealing and/or reduction processes. 0 1997 Elsevier
Science B.V

Sayan, S.

Suzer, S.

Uner, D. O.

Journal of Molecular Structure

Bilkent University Institutional Repository

Journal of MOLECULAR STRUCTURE ELSEVIER Journal of Molecular Structure 410-411 (1997) Ill- 114 XPS and in-situ IR investigation of Ru/Si02 catalyst I$. Sayan”, 8. Siizera’*, D.O. Unerb aBilkent University, Chemistry Department, 06533 Ankara, Turkey bMiddle East Technical University, Chemical Engineering Department, 06531 Ankara, Turkey Received 26 August 1996; accepted 6 September 1996 Abstract Ru(NO)(N0&/Si02 catalyst precursors were characterized via XPS and in-situ reflectance IR spectroscopy before, during and after reduction by hydrogen over the temperature range 300-800 K. IR results indicated that the catalyst precursor lost NO3 groups first, with subsequent loss of NO both in a reducing atmosphere and during thermal annealing. XPS was used to derive information on the oxidation state of Ru in the various steps of the annealing and/or reduction processes. 0 1997 Elsevier Science B.V. Keywords: Ru catalyst; XPS; In-situ IR 1. Introduction Electron spectroscopic techniques along with IR and NMR have successfully been employed to char- acterize the chemical species formed in various steps of catalytic processes [l-3]. Pederson and Lunsford reported an XPS study of ruthenium in zeolite-Y under both oxidizing and reducing environments [4]. Bianchi et. al. studied various ruthenium compounds and catalysts via XPS [5]. They observed that thermal annealing was sufficient for reduction when the Ru compound was in its pure form. They further indi- cated that a reducing atmosphere was needed to bring Ru to its zero-valent state when an oxide phase was present as a catalyst support. Muhler et al. reported a study of an alkali-promoted ruthenium catalyst for ammonia synthesis [6]. Their XPS measurements indicated that the Ru 3d peak shifted * Corresponding author. by 1 eV to a lower binding energy in the presence of Cs. Interaction of OH groups in silica with zero-valent Ru was followed via ‘H NMR spectroscopy in a pre- vious study [7]. In this work, we will extend the NMR study to include XPS and IR studies while following the course of reduction of a Ru(NO)(NOs)s compound to its zero-valent state. 2. Experimental A 4 wt% Ru catalyst was used in this study, which is prepared via an incipient wetness technique using ruthenium nitrosyl-nitrate solution (Strem Chemi- cals, 1.5 wt% Ru) as described previously [8]. Ruthe- nium nitrosyl-nitrate powder obtained from Johnson-Matthey Chemicals was used to investigate the behavior in the absence of SiOz. A pure silica sample with a specific surface area of 450 m* g-’ from Riedel de Haen was also used as a reference. OO22-2860/97/$17.00 0 1997 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. PII SOO22-2860(96)09637-8 112 8. Sayan et al./Joumal of Molecular Structure 410-411 (1997) III-114 The IR spectra were obtained using an a Bomem MB 102 FT-IR spectrometer equipped with a Harrick DRA-B03 diffuse reflectance attachment and an MCT detector. An in-situ infrared cell, equipped with ZnSe windows and capable of operating in the range of 300 < T < 800 K and lOA < P < 1000 torr, was used for reduction studies. Powdered samples were introduced into a copper sample holder, placed in the reactor cell and reduced by successive evacuation/hydrogen exposure cycles at 100, 200, 300 and 350°C and at a pressure of 1.5 atm for 1 h. IR data were collected at 4 cm-’ resolution and 1024 scans. XPS measurements were performed on a Kratos ES300 spectrometer using Mg Ka excitation (hv = 1253.6 eV). The C 1s line (B.E. = 285.0 eV) from residual hydrocarbons deposited on the surface of the sample was used as a reference. Our XPS spectro- meter is not suitable for in-situ analysis. Therefore, thermal treatments of the samples were carried out in the UHV chamber of the spectrometer by gradual heating of the sample to 170°C in situ. XPS data were recorded after each step. XPS data of samples after reduction in the reactor were taken after an unavoidable brief exposure to air during their transfer into the spectrometer. 3. Results and discussions Fig. 1 displays the IR diffuse-reflectance spectra of the 4% Ru/Si02 powders at room temperature and after 60 min reduction under H2 atmosphere at the corresponding temperatures. The bands at 1427 and 1925 cm-’ are attributed to bent NO and terminal NO groups respectively, and the band at 1521 cm-’ is attributed to NO3 [9]. Loss of hydrogen bonded O-H bands and stepwise removal of NO3 bands fol- lowed by those of NO are the general features, and com- plete removal is achieved only after heating to 350°C in hydrogen. In addition, the NO bands are red-shifted and broadened during this reduction process. Fig. 2 shows the XPS spectra of the N 1 s and Ru 3d regions before, during and after annealing of the unsupported Ru(NO)(NOs)s compound. Owing to the small cross-section of the N 1s level in com- parison with the Ru 3d level [lo], only in the pure ruthenium nitrosyl-nitrate compound could a 1000 2000 3cmo 4ooo Wavenumbers (cm-l) Fig. 1. Mid-IR diffuse-reflectance spectra of 4% Ru catalyst pre- cursor dispersed in silica and after reduction in hydrogen for 1 h at the indicated temperatures. reasonable signal-to-noise ratio be achieved in both the N 1s and Ru 3d regions. Before annealing, two Nls peaks at 405.6 eV and 401.8 eV, corresponding to NO3 and NO nitrogens and with the correct stoichio- metry of 3:1, are present. There is only one Ru 3d spin-orbit doublet with the 5/2 component at 283.1 eV which can be assigned to the + 4 state [ 111. During annealing, a stepwise removal of NO3 followed by NO can again be observed. In spite of the gradual decrease in the intensity of the N 1s peaks, the binding energies remain constant in contrast with the case of Ru 3d. Starting with the initial loss of N03, a Ru 3dsj2 peak at 282.3 eV assigned to the + 3 oxidation state appears, followed by another one at 28 1.3 ( + 2) all the way to metallic Ru at 279.4 eV. When the supported ruthenium compound was studied, the Ru 3d doublet was found to be broad, with a binding energy of $. Sayan et al./Joumal of Molecular Structure 410-4/l (1997) 111-114 113 N ls(x5) Ru 3d +Cls after durmq during NO3 before _~. __I I __._L- 406 398 290 285 280 Binding Energy CeV) Fig. 2. N Is and Ru 3d regions of the XPS spectra of Ru(NO)(NOj)j before, during and after annealing up to 170°C in the UHV chamber of the spectrometer. A, B, C and D refer to the + 4, + 3, + 2 and 0 oxidation states of Ru respectively. 282.3 eV corresponding to the + 3 state (not shown here). Broadening can be attributed to dispersion of the metal particles on the support, and the reduction of Ru from + 4 of the precursor compound to + 3 of the supported one can either be attributed to a partial loss of NO; groups and/or to electron transfer from the support and/or NO groups. XPS spectra of the same compound after reduction with hydrogen again revealed a single, broad Ru 3d doublet at a binding energy of 28 1.3 eV corresponding to Ru*+. The failure to observe the zero-valent state is most probably due to exposure to air during transfer. Acknowledgements This work is supported by TOBITAK, the Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey, through the project TBAG-COST/l. 114 ,S. Sayan et a/./Journal of Molecular Structure 410-411 (1997) I II-114 References [l] E.S. Shipiro, V.I. Avaev, G.V. Antoshin, M.A. Ryashentseva and K.M. Minachev, J. Catal., 55 (1978) 402. [2] T.L. Barr, in Auger and X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, D. Briggs and M. Seah (Eds.), Practical Surface Analysis, Vol. I, 2nd edn., Wiley, Chichester, 1994. [3] D.M. Hercules, A. Proctor and M. Houalla, Act. Chem. Res., 27 (1994) 387. [4] L.A. Pederson and J.H. Lunsford, J. Catal., 61 (1980) 39. [5] C.L. Bianchi, V. Ragaini and M.G. Cattania, Mat. Chem. Phys., 29 (1991) 297. [6] M. Muhler, F. Rosowski, 0. Hinrichsen, A. Homung and G. Ertl, in J.W. Hightower, W.N. Delgass, E. Iglesia and A.T. Bell (Eds.), Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis IO 1, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1996. [7] S.J. Hwang, D.O. Uner, T.S. King, M. Pruski and B.C. Gerstein, J. Phys. Chem., 99 (I 995) 3697. [8] D.O. Uner, M. Pruski, B.C. Gerstein and T.S. King, J. Catal., 146 (1994) 530. [9] K. Nakamoto, IR and Raman Spectra of Inorganic and Coor- dination Compounds, 4th edn., Wiley, New York, 1986. [IO] J.H. Scotield, J. Electron. Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom., 8 (1976) 129. [l I] J.P. Moulder, W.F. Stickel, P.E. Sohol and K.D. Bomben, Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectrocopy, Perkin- Elmer Corporation, Eden Prairie, MN, 1992. 

XPS and in-situ IR investigation of Ru/Si02 catalyst

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Bilkent University Institutional Repository