Amaral, Joana S.

Oliveira, Beatriz

Seabra, R.M.

Seabra, Rosa M.

Biblioteca Digital do IPB

INTRADFOOD 2005 Congress Proceedings INNOVATIONS IN T.RADITIONAL FOODS Valencia, 25 to 28 October 2005 VOLUME I Edited by Pedro Fito and Fidel Toldra ,. ELSEVIER Printed on behalf of Elsevier, London 2005 lr.'TRADFooo- EFFoST CoNFERENCE 2005 345 Tocopherols and tocotrienols composi-tion of hazelnuts J.S. Amaral * 1•2, R.M. Seabra\ M.B.P.P. Oliveira3 REQUIMTE, FFUP, 'Servit;o de Farmacognosia and 3Servit;o de Bromatologia, Portugal; 2ESTiG, lnstituto Politecnico de Bragan<;a, Portugal Introduction Vitamin E is.a term used to gener-ally refer a group of compounds: a-, {3-, y-, and c5- tocopherols and tocotrienols. These compounds are believed to be involved in a diversity of physio logica l and biochemical functions, mainly due to their antioxi-dant activity by inhibiting lipid peroxidation in biological membranes (Mishima •. 2003; Theriault, 1999). Be-sides the antioxidant activity of these compounds, several studies on the health effects of the non-a-tocopherol vitamers have been recently pub-lished (Mishima, 2003; Theriault, 1999; Li 1999, Campbell, 2003). Due to their antioxidant activity, this family of compounds is also particularly im-portant in the prevention of lipid oxi-dation processes that reduce foods shelf life and sensorial characteri s-tics. Vegetable oils are probably the main dietary source of vitamin E, be-ing nuts, cereals, and fruits other valuable sources (Woollard, 2003). Owing to the richness iri vitamin E present in nuts, and since hazelnuts are widely used as raw material in a large range of products, this study aims to analyse several hazelnuts cultivars in terms of their Vitamin E qualitative and quantitative composi-tions. Materials and methods Samples. Samples were from Vila Real, Portugal (19 cultivars) and from Felgueiras, Portugal (1 0 cultivars), all collected in the 2002 year crop. Standards and reagents. Individual stock solutions (- Smg/ml) of each isomer (a-, {3-, y- and o- tocopherols and tocotrienols, Calbiochem, CA, USA) were prepared in n-hexane. A stock standard mixture, with the dif-ferent isomers in relative proportions similar to those presented by the samples, was prepared and diluted to working standard mixtures. Tocol (Matreya Inc., PA, USA) was used as internal standard (IS); a stock solution 346 SESSION I · NOVEL ANALYTICAL TOOLS FOR FOOIJ QUALITY ASSI!SSMI!NT at 10 mg/ml in n-hexane was kept at-4 2C, protected from ligllt, and diluted to working solutions (500 ,ug/ml) as necessary. BHT (1 0 mg/ml, in n-hexane) was from Aldrich (Madrid, Spain). n- Hexane was HPLC grade from Mere!< (Darmstad, Germany) and 1 ,4-dioxane was from Fluka (Ma-drid, Spain). Extraction procedure. Samples were extracted using a previously validated methodology (Amaral, 2005). Chopped hazelnuts (-300 mg) were accurately weighted in glass screw cap tubes and subsequently the IS (150 ,ul of tocol solution) and the antioxidant (1 00 ,ul of BHT solu-tion) were added. The sample was homogenized for 1 min by vortex mix-ing, alter the addition of each of the following rea:gents: ethanol (2 ml), extracting solvent (n-hexane, 4 ml), and saturated NaCI solution (2 ml). After that, the sample was centrifuged (2 min, 5000 rpm) and the clear upper layer transferred to another tube. The sample was re-extracted twice. The combined extracts were taken to dry-ness under a nitrogen stream, at room temperature, transferred to microcentrifuge tubes with 1.5 ml of n-hexane and, finally, water was re-moved with anhydrous sodium sul-phate. The extract was centrifuged (10000 rpm, 20 s), transferred into a darl< injection vial and analysed by HPLC. HPLC analysis. The HPLC equip-ment consisted of an integrated sys-tem with a PU-980 pump, an AS-950 auto-samp ler, a MD-91 0 multiwavelength di.ode array detector (DAD), and .a FP-920 fluorescence detector (Jasco, Japan). Data were analyzed using a Borwin-PDA Con-troller Software (JMBS, France). The chromatographic separation was ach ieved with an lnertsi l 5 SI (250 x 3 mm) normal -phase column from Varian (Middelburg, Netherlands) op-erating at room temperature. The mo-bile phase was a mixture of n-hexane and dioxane (95.5:4.5, v/v) at a flow rate of 0.7 mUmin, and the injection volume was 10 pl. The effluent was monitored with a DAD connected in series with a fluorescence detector, programmed for excitation at 290nm and emission at 330nm. The com-pounds were identified by chromato-graphic comparisons with authentic standards and by their ·uv spectra. Quantification was made by fluores-cence detection based on the internal standard method. Results and discussion Three extractions procedures were previously assayed (Amaral, 2005) and the best results were ob-tained using an extraction procedure with n-hexane wl1ich was used to analyze the studied samples. a-, {j-, y-and a- tocopherols, and b- tocotrienol were detected in all the studied cultivars. Some samples also pre-sented a- and g- tocotrienols in minor amounts. Figure 1 shows a typical chromatogram of a hazelnut sample containing the seven identified com-pounds. The average contents of each v itamer for every. cultivar are shown in Table 1. In all samples a-to-copherol was the major compound, ranging from 105.9 mg/kg to 226.8 mg/kg. In general, Vitamin E total contents are higher in the Felgueiras location when compared to Vila Real location. Since the cultivars where identical in these two locations, these can indicate that climate or different agricultural practices can influence INlltllnFooo- EFFoST CoNFFlltNt'E :!005 3-17 1 lj3 I I I 11 I I 4 I ,; . - I '' '! I ; ~ 2 I 1,, ; ~ . ; : ' ! '· ' - ' ,,. l J ·' ~ • ., , . .. BHT ' IS 3 2 1 4 s s . .l_ ~_1_]\._~--L. I~ --~-==----7--=;:;: !"_ Figure 1. HPLC with fluorescence detection chromatogram of a hazelnut sample. Peaks: I.S., internal standard (tocol); 1, a-tocopherol; 2, tY.·tocotrienol; 3, p-tocopherol; 4, y-tocopherol; 5, P-tocotrienol; 6, y-tocotrienol; 7, li-tocopherol; BHT, butylated hydroxytoluene. Table 1. Tocopherol and Tocotrienol contents (mg/kg hazelnut) of the studied cultivars by geograpnicallocation. nd: not determined; T: tocopherol; TTR: tocotrienol Goouraphleal CuiUvar u.r tt·TTR 11-T Y·T II·TTR 'r·TTR &.T Tolal loeailon Vola Real Builer 140.65 :t 0.28 ncJ 5.34 ±0.05 3.08 ±005 0.21 :tO.OO 0.35±0.01 0.64 :tO.OO 150.26 Campanica 186.83 :t 2. 19 nd 6.25 ±0.09 9.83±0.03 0.19 .1.0.01 0.35±0.01 1.21 ±0.02 204.65 Cos lord 171.12 ± 0.76 ncJ 8.49±0.03 9.53±0.04 0. 13 sO.OO 0.30 .. 0 .01 2.77 .tO.OI 192.34 Couplol 188.63"' 1.53 121 :tOOS 8.38±0.02 4.16>c0.03 0 15 :tO.OO 0.39;~.0.03 1.20:t0.01 204.13 Da\oiana 176.54 .. 2.09 ncJ 6.10±0.11 4.39:<0.10 0 .16 >:0.01 0 .20 :tOOl 0.70 :t0.02 188.19 EMIS 165.71 ±0.52 ncJ 5.93:0.05 6.18,.0.09 0 .14 ~o.oo nd 0.88.1.0.03 178.85 Ferhlkl Coulard 146.8G:t009 ncJ 4.01 :<0.03 3.69:t0.04 0 29 :<0.00 nd 0.27:<0.00 155. 13 Grossal 196.00:t3.41 '1.03:t0.11 5.78 ±0.09 4.15 :<0.04 0.33 :<0.03 0.33 ±0.02 0.46±0.03 208.08 Gunslberl 194,49,.2.21 1.22 J.0.09 9.27%. 0.09 a22 so. 12 0.37 ~0.01 0.46 :t.0.03 2.42 ±0.03 216.4·1 l.Dnslng 145.56 ± 1.26 ncJ 4.30:t 0.10 7.12 ±0.04 010 :tO.OI 0 .25 c0.01 0.47 ±0.03 157.00 Lonoue Espanl' a 173.88"' 2.46 nd 6.73±0.13 8.03±0. 16 0.33 .. o.o2 0.40 :<0.02 1.14 ±0.01 190.51 Mcrvellle Bollwlller 156.38 ± 0. 70 nd 5.91 ± 0.04 3.31 ±0.0 1 0 .12 ±001 nO 0.76 ±0.02 168.'18 Morell 166.20 :t4.08 1.18±0.05 0.7810.12 5.03:0.07 0 .33 ±0.0 1 0.'13 .. 0.01 0.69 ,.0.01 202.65 Negrolo 166.19:0.40 net 5.61 ±0.01 6.51 ±0.04 0 .16 zO.OI 0.34 :t0.02 0.69:0.01 109.53 Pauolol 168.80 :t1 .68 nd 5.07:0.08 6.86 :t0.07 0.09 :tO.OO 0.28:<0.01 0.76 :t0.01 162.76 Rood Piemonl 165.88 ±0 ~3 nd 4.18;. 0.0~ 6.10 J.O.OS O.OO..tO.OO 0.41 %0.02 0.40 ±0.00 176.97 Segorbe 221.19 ±0.64 nd 9.·11%0.10 5.45:0.04 025 ±0.02 0.47%0.01 '0.57 ,.0.01 237.33 St. 1..- Oo Josus 167.18 "'0.43 ncJ 3 .611. 0.12 5.79:0.04 0.30 :tOOl 0 49 :<0.03 0 .26:0.00 177.62 T onda G1Jionni 214.33,. 1.52 ncJ 4.57:0.06 4.23 ±0.01 0.28:0.01 0.30>.0.04 0.25 :t0.01 223.95 Fei!Juefras Buller 164.30 "'0.43 ncJ 9.81 :tO.OO 5.21 :0.06 0.33:0.01 027 .. 0.01 1.45 0.00 201.37 Campanlea 100.30 * 0.42 nd 5.43±0.15 5.95 so0.08 023 :~:0.01 0.24 :tO.OI· 0.9Ch002 203.05 eosroru 22357 :t028 nd 12.01 ±0.03 6.61 ±0.06 026 zO.OO 061:t0.00 1.56 ±0.01 246.63 Couplal 110. 15 ± 1.99 n<1 4.32 >.0.09 2.67%0.07 005 .. o.oo 0.00±0.05 0.64 ±0.03 117.83 Ennls 123.89 "'2.66 ncJ 5.•16:0.1~ 5.85:t0.15 0 .12 ±0.00 3.20 .. 0 .12 1.08 J:0.02 139.59 Ferlille C9u1ard 226.63 ± 1,85 1.22 .. o.oJ 8.01 ±0.15 9.75±0.18 026±0.01 0.33J:0.01 1.03 :0.03 2•17.45 Mervollle Bollwillar 1 05.07 z 0 .21 nd 4.07 :t0.07 2.60. 0.02 0.05 .. o .oo nd 0.61 :~:0.01 113.21 Moroll 221.22 .t3.19 1.10z0.04 9.12 ±0.17 13.39 ±0.76 0.40 :t.O.OO 0.34 J:O.OO 2.37 :0.15 2•17.93 Pouele l 201.0·1 "'3.26 nd 7.'10 :t 0.15 7.60 ±0.17 0.09 :LO.OO 0.25z0.01 1.14 ±O.O:l 217.52 T onoo Gllfonnl 219.94 %0.59 nd 5.-14 :t0.01 4.74 ±0.0·1 0.12 :tO.OO 0 .24 :t0.01 0.'13 ::0.01 230.92 348 SESSION I · NoVEL 1\NALYTIC,\L TOOLS FOR FOOD QUALITY ASSESS~IENT hazelnuts Vitamin E contents. Differ-ences in the vitamin E profiles among cultivars also seem to exist. In conclusion, the values here re-ported represent a contribution for the chemical caracterization of this kind of nut. The same cultivars are being studied along different year crops, in order to confirm if differences exist among years and geographical loca-tions. References 1. Mishima, K., Tanaka, T., Pu, F., Egashira, N., lwasaki, K., Hidaka, R., Matsunaga, I<. ,Tal<ata, J., Karube, Y., Fujiwara, M. 2003. Vitamin E isororms -tocotrienol and -tocopherol prevent cerebral infarction in mice. Neuroscience Letters, 33:756-60. 2. Theriault, A., Chao, J., Wang, Q., Gapor, A., Adeli, K. 1999. Tocotrienol: a review or its therapeutic potential. Clinical Biochemis-try, 32:309. . 3. Li, D., Saldeen, T., Mehta, J.L. 1999. Bio-cl1emical and Biophysical Research Com-munications, 259:157-161. 4. Campbell, S., Stone, W., Whaley, S., Krishnan, K. 2003 . Deve l opm~qnt of gamma-tocopherol as a colorectal cancer chemopreventive agent. Critical Reviews in Oncology!l-lematology, 47:249-259. 5.Woollard, D.C., lndyk, H.E. In Encyclopedia of Food Science and Nutrition, 2003, Aca-demic Press, London, pp. 5789. 6. Amaral, J.S.; Casal, S.; Torres, D.; Seabra, R.M.; Oliveira, B.P.P. Simultaneous deter-mination of tocopherols and tocotrienols in hazelnuts by a normal phase liquid chro· matographic method, Analytical Sciences, in press. 

Tocopherols and tocotrienols composition of hazelnuts

http://bibliotecadigital.ipb.pt/bitstream/10198/2753/3/Intrafood2%20proceedings%20.pdf

Tocopherols and tocotrienols composition of hazelnuts

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Biblioteca Digital do IPB