Like in the US, the EU “internal electricity market” remains unfinished and its construction can stall, fracturing 
 into “national blocks” separated by permanent “border effects”. This is exactly what this paper seeks to avoid in the expected 
 life of the current European Commission (2005-2009). It identifies the critical factors: national and EU market designs, 
 industry structure and competition policy, deeper regional cooperation between TSOs and Regulators. It suggests 8 
 priority actions and 12 secondary improvements to sustain the dynamics of the construction of an EU set of open r
 egional markets with limited “border effects”, and explains the rationale for these recommendations

Glachant, Jean-Michel

Lévêque, François

English

Like in the US, the EU “internal electricity market” remains unfinished and its construction can stall, fracturing 
 into “national blocks” separated by permanent “border effects”. This is exactly what this paper seeks to avoid in the expected 
 life of the current European Commission (2005-2009). It identifies the critical factors: national and EU market designs, 
 industry structure and competition policy, deeper regional cooperation between TSOs and Regulators. It suggests 8 
 priority actions and 12 secondary improvements to sustain the dynamics of the construction of an EU set of open r
 egional markets with limited “border effects”, and explains the rationale for these recommendations

Apollo (Cambridge)

Electricity Internal Market in the European Union: What to do next?

The European Union's "internal energy market" remains a work in progress. It is even possible its construction were to stall. Given current political, institutional and business conditions in Europe, there are no guarantees that the dynamics of this construction will not dissipate, as in the United States, or that the internal market will not fracture into "national blocks" that may be permanent or persist for a long time. This is exactly what this paper seeks to avoid. It suggests priority actions and secondary improvements to sustain the dynamics of construction of the internal market, from today to the few coming years. It tries too to explain the underlying rationale for these recommendations by describing several aspects of the present state of the construction of the internal market and what factors are blocking or unblocking its progress. A main constraint has guided our thinking and writing of this paper. We have excluded the issuance of a new package of European directives and regulations to push for stronger convergence in the construction of the EU internal energy market. In fact, such an event is low likely.(cont.) By contrast, we have counted on two levers: the conscientious applying of the provisions of the second directive and companion regulations, and the promoting of reinforced regional cooperation agreements that will lead to the voluntary opening of some domestic markets to regional "mini internal markets". We believe and try to demonstrate that thank to these levers a minimal but sufficient dynamics of construction can be fostered. The identified priority actions will allow to progress without precluding further policy changes at a later date. Then the length of the phase is defined by the expected life of the current College of European Union Commissioners, that is until 2009. The paper is divided into 5 sections. Each section corresponds to priorities to improve a critical factor: 1- national market designs, 2- EU internal market design, 3- industry structure, 4- TSOs, and 5- regulators. Each section will indicate what makes this factor a key for the building of the internal market and what are the priority or secondary actions which could be useful to keep constructing an EU electricity single market from 2005 to 2009. that this paper does not cover all the areas of the European energy policy. Other topics representing core interests of the European Union and the 25 Member States, such as "Security of Supply" and "Sustainability of European Energy Regime", have not been treated in this paper. They deserve further investigation and analysis.(cont.) Note that this paper does not cover all the areas of the European energy policy. Other topics representing core interests of the European Union and the 25 Member States, such as "Security of Supply" and "Sustainability of European Energy Regime", have not been treated in this paper. They deserve further investigation and analysis

DSpace@MIT

Electricity internal market in the European Union : what to do next?

http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/1721.1/45045/1/2005-015.pdf

Electricity Internal Market in the European Union: What to do next?

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Apollo (Cambridge)

DSpace@MIT