Linear dimensionality reduction methods are a cornerstone of analyzing high
dimensional data, due to their simple geometric interpretations and typically
attractive computational properties. These methods capture many data features
of interest, such as covariance, dynamical structure, correlation between data
sets, input-output relationships, and margin between data classes. Methods have
been developed with a variety of names and motivations in many fields, and
perhaps as a result the connections between all these methods have not been
highlighted. Here we survey methods from this disparate literature as
optimization programs over matrix manifolds. We discuss principal component
analysis, factor analysis, linear multidimensional scaling, Fisher's linear
discriminant analysis, canonical correlations analysis, maximum autocorrelation
factors, slow feature analysis, sufficient dimensionality reduction,
undercomplete independent component analysis, linear regression, distance
metric learning, and more. This optimization framework gives insight to some
rarely discussed shortcomings of well-known methods, such as the suboptimality
of certain eigenvector solutions. Modern techniques for optimization over
matrix manifolds enable a generic linear dimensionality reduction solver, which
accepts as input data and an objective to be optimized, and returns, as output,
an optimal low-dimensional projection of the data. This simple optimization
framework further allows straightforward generalizations and novel variants of
classical methods, which we demonstrate here by creating an
orthogonal-projection canonical correlations analysis. More broadly, this
survey and generic solver suggest that linear dimensionality reduction can move
toward becoming a blackbox, objective-agnostic numerical technology.JPC and ZG received funding from the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC EP/H019472/1). JPC received funding from a Sloan Research Fellowship, the Simons Foundation (SCGB#325171 and SCGB#325233), the Grossman Center at Columbia University, and the Gatsby Charitable Trust.This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from MIT Press via http://jmlr.org/papers/v16/cunningham15a.htm