CORE
CO
nnecting
RE
positories
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Research partnership
About
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Community governance
Governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
Innovations
Our research
Labs
Understanding chemotherapy treatment pathways of advanced colorectal cancer patients to inform an economic evaluation in the United Kingdom
Authors
A Antonini
A Grothey
+39 more
Anonymous
C Tournigand
D Craig
E Marcuello
E Rouits
E Van Cutsem
EA Fargher
F H Shabaruddin
F Innocenti
G Toffoli
GE Palomaki
HT Gold
J Leal
J W Valle
JA Maroun
JM Hoskins
K Payne
K Payne
L Bojke
LP Rivory
M Obradovic
M Sculpher
M Sculpher
MJ Hassett
MS Aapro
MT Seymour
MT Seymour
P Leonard
PH Garthwaite
R A Elliott
R Ferraldeschi
S Nagar
S Wordsworth
SA Ferro
TJ Smith
V Golfinopoulos
W G Newman
Y Ando
Z Philips
Publication date
27 July 2010
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group
Doi
View
on
PubMed
Abstract
Background: Accurate description of current practice within advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) specialties were needed to inform an economic evaluation of the UGT1A1 pharmacogenetic test for irinotecan in the United Kingdom.Methods: The study was based on a literature review and elicitation of expert opinion. The expert panel comprised 44 consultant oncologists in NHS Hospital Trusts across England.Results: Ten first-line, 10 second-line and 12 third-line chemotherapy regimens were reported, reflecting wide variations in treatment pathways. Predominant pathways emerged with: first-line treatment with oxaliplatin-based regimens, second-line treatment with irinotecan-based regimens and third-line treatment with mitomycin-based regimens. Experts estimated the frequency of febrile neutropaenia 8.4% (95% CI: 6.7-10.0), septic neutropaenia 4.7% (95% CI: 3.4-6.0) and severe diarrhoea 13.1% (95% CI: 10.8-15.5). Approaches for the clinical management of neutropaenia within the NHS were described.Conclusions: This study identified wide variations in the clinical management of advanced CRC patients. Descriptions of current treatment pathways are necessary for economic evaluations. Variations in clinical practice must be reflected in the model to ensure the findings from an economic evaluation of UGT1A1 testing are sufficient to inform policy regarding the cost-effective use of NHS resources. © 2010 Cancer Research UK All rights reserved
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
The University of Manchester - Institutional Repository
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:pure.atira.dk:openaire/2d4...
Last time updated on 25/12/2025
The University of Manchester - Institutional Repository
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:pure.atira.dk:publications...
Last time updated on 01/02/2017
Crossref
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
info:doi/10.1038%2Fsj.bjc.6605...
Last time updated on 03/01/2020
The University of Manchester - Institutional Repository
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:pure.atira.dk:openaire_cri...
Last time updated on 09/10/2025