Tuntutan Ganti Rugi dalam Perbuatan Melawan Hukum: suatu Perbandingan dengan Wanprestasi

Abstract

Conception of tort law is often equated with the concept of bad-faith actions (default). Though both are very different conceptions of each other, although both are derived from the engagement, the engagement konpsesi defaulting from the birth of the agreement and the conception of tort comes from the birth of the engagement of the law. Besides the differences are also apparent from the compensation charged. Based on this study intended to examine the conception of tort law and breach of contract in civil law and the claims for compensation due to due to unlawful act or breach of contract action (default) is. For his research and writing is made and prepared by the method of juridical normative research that uses qualitative analysis of data derived from primary legal materials, materials related to kosepsi secondary law tort and breach of contract and demand compensation. This study approaches the law (Statute approach) is done by reviewing some laws and other regulations relevant