This thesis studies configurable circuits and their impact on multi-standard RF front-end architectures. In particular, low-voltage low-power linear LNA and mixer topologies suitable for implementation in multi-standard front-ends are subject of the investigation. With respect to frequency and bandwidth, multi-standard front-ends can be implemented using either tunable or wideband LNA and mixer topologies. Based on the type of the LNA and mixer(s), multi-standard receiver RF front-ends can be divided into three groups. They can be (tunable) narrow-band, wide-band or combined. The advantages and disadvantages of the different multi-standard receiver RF front-ends have been discussed in detail. The partitioning between off-chip selectivity, on-chip selectivity provided by the LNA and mixer, linearity, power consumption and occupied chip area in each multi-standard RF front-end group are thoroughly investigated. A Figure of Merit (FOM) for the multi-standard receiver RF front-end has been introduced. Based on this FOM the most suitable multi-standard RF front-end group in terms of cost-effectiveness can be selected. In order to determine which multi-standard RF front-end group is the most cost-effective for a practical application, a GSM850/E-GSM/DCS/PCS/Bluetooth/WLANa/b/g multi-standard receiver RF front-end is chosen as a demonstrator. These standards are the most frequently used standards in wireless communication, and this combination of standards allows to users almost "anytime-anywhere" voice and data transfer. In order to verify these results, three demonstrators have been defined, designed and implemented, two wideband RF front-end circuits in 90nm CMOS and 65nm CMOS, and one combined multi-standard RF front-end circuit in 65nm CMOS. The proposed multi-standard demonstrators have been compared with the state-of the art narrow-band, wide-band and combined multi-standard RF front-ends. On the proposed multi-standard RF front-ends and the state-of the art multi-standard RF front-ends the proposed FOM have been applied. The comparison shows that the combined multi-standard RF front-end group is the most cost effective multi-standard group for this application
