CORE
πΊπ¦Β
Β make metadata, not war
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Implementing informative priors for heterogeneity in meta-analysis using meta-regression and pseudo data.
Authors
Julian PT Higgins
Dan Jackson
+4Β more
Kirsty M Rhodes
David J Spiegelhalter
Rebecca M Turner
Ian R White
Publication date
30 August 2016
Publisher
Stat Med
Doi
Cite
View
on
PubMed
Abstract
Many meta-analyses combine results from only a small number of studies, a situation in which the between-study variance is imprecisely estimated when standard methods are applied. Bayesian meta-analysis allows incorporation of external evidence on heterogeneity, providing the potential for more robust inference on the effect size of interest. We present a method for performing Bayesian meta-analysis using data augmentation, in which we represent an informative conjugate prior for between-study variance by pseudo data and use meta-regression for estimation. To assist in this, we derive predictive inverse-gamma distributions for the between-study variance expected in future meta-analyses. These may serve as priors for heterogeneity in new meta-analyses. In a simulation study, we compare approximate Bayesian methods using meta-regression and pseudo data against fully Bayesian approaches based on importance sampling techniques and Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC). We compare the frequentist properties of these Bayesian methods with those of the commonly used frequentist DerSimonian and Laird procedure. The method is implemented in standard statistical software and provides a less complex alternative to standard MCMC approaches. An importance sampling approach produces almost identical results to standard MCMC approaches, and results obtained through meta-regression and pseudo data are very similar. On average, data augmentation provides closer results to MCMC, if implemented using restricted maximum likelihood estimation rather than DerSimonian and Laird or maximum likelihood estimation. The methods are applied to real datasets, and an extension to network meta-analysis is described. The proposed method facilitates Bayesian meta-analysis in a way that is accessible to applied researchers. © 2016 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
Crossref
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
info:doi/10.1002%2Fsim.7090
Last time updated on 01/04/2019
UCL Discovery
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:eprints.ucl.ac.uk.OAI2:100...
Last time updated on 05/04/2019
Supporting member
Explore Bristol Research
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:research-information.bris....
Last time updated on 17/01/2017