CORE
CO
nnecting
RE
positories
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Research partnership
About
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Community governance
Governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
Innovations
Our research
Labs
research
Cognitive Mechanisms underlying visual perspective taking in typical and ASC children
Authors
Aichhorn
Baron-Cohen
+40 more
Berument
Bosbach
Dawson
Devries
Dowell
Dunn
Eigsti
Farrant
Flavell
Flavell
Frith
Frith
Frith
Gardner
Geiser
Grush
Ham
Hamilton
Hamilton
Happe
Joseph
Kessler
Kessler
Kessler
Langdon
Liddle
Muth
Pearson
Reed
Schurz
Senju
Surtees
Surtees
Tan
Tessari
Wellman
Wimmer
Yirmiya
Yu
Zacks
Publication date
1 January 2016
Publisher
'Wiley'
Doi
Abstract
Previous research has suggested that people with Autism Spectrum Conditions (ASC) may have difficulty with visual perspective taking (VPT) but it is not clear how this relates to different strategies that can be used in perspective taking tasks. The current study examined VPT in 30 children with autism and 30 verbal mental age matched typical children, in comparison to mental rotation (MR) abilities and body representation abilities. Using a similar paradigm to Hamilton, Brindley, and Frith [2009] all children completed three tasks: a VPT task in which children decided what a toy on a table would look like from a different points of view; a MR task in which the child decided what a toy would look like after it had been rotated; and a body posture matching task, in which children matched pictures of a body shown from different viewpoints. Results showed that children with ASC performed better than the typically developing children on the MR task, and at a similar level on the VPT task and body matching task. Importantly, in the typical children VPT performance was predicted by performance on the body matching task, whereas in the ASC children VPT performance was predicted by MR ability. These findings suggest that differences in VPT in ASC may be explained by the use of a spatial rotation strategy rather than the embodied egocentric transformation strategy used by typical children. Autism Res 2015. © 2015 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
Supporting member
Explore Bristol Research
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:research-information.bris....
Last time updated on 19/12/2025
Crossref
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
info:doi/10.1002%2Faur.1501
Last time updated on 04/12/2019
Repository@Nottingham
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:nottingham-repository.work...
Last time updated on 31/01/2019
Sunderland University Institutional Repository
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:sure.sunderland.ac.uk:5871
Last time updated on 09/02/2017
Supporting member
Explore Bristol Research
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:research-information.bris....
Last time updated on 17/01/2017