Program of events and list of registered attendees for the October 6, 1994 conference Which Scientist Do You Believe? Process Alternatives in Technological Controversies  held in Concord, NH

RISK Editorial Board

English

UNH Scholars' Repository

RISK: Health, Safety & Environment (1990-2002)Volume 6 | Number 2 Article 13March 1995Program - Which Scientist Do You Believe -Process Alternatives in TechnologicalControversiesRISK Editorial BoardFollow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/riskPart of the Law Commons, Life Sciences Commons, Physical Sciences and MathematicsCommons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences CommonsThis Conference Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the University of New Hampshire – School of Law at University of NewHampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in RISK: Health, Safety & Environment (1990-2002) by an authorized editor ofUniversity of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact ellen.phillips@law.unh.edu.Repository CitationRISK Editorial Board, Program - Which Scientist Do You Believe - Process Alternatives in Technological Controversies, 6 RISK 183 (1995).ProgramWhich Scientist Do You Believe?Process Alternatives in Technological Controversies*October 6, 1994The Challenge'Robert M. Viles,2 WelcomeArthur Kantrowitz, The Separation of Facts and ValuesPeter W. Huber, Coping with Phantom Risks in the CourtsKristin S. Shrader-Frechette, Evaluating the Expertise of ExpertsSidney A. Shapiro, Resolving Technological Controversies inRegulatory AgenciesSelected ExperienceItzhak Jacoby, Resolving Medical ControversiesNorman L. Balmer, Alternative Dispute Resolution in PatentControversiesOctober 7Innovations Under ConsiderationJeffrey S. Lubbers, Regulatory Reform Recommendations of theNational Performance Review: An OverviewDalton G. Paxman, Congressional Risk ProposalsAlbert A. Scherr, Scientific Disputes in the Courts: The Forensic DNAExperienceProcess AlternativesRena I Steinzor, ADR in Technology-Based Legislative ControversiesAllan Mazur, A Candidate for a "Science Court"Thomas G. Field, Jr., Scientific Arbitration Panels* Sponsored by the Fannie and John Hertz Foundation, the Ethical, Legal andSocial Issues component of the Department of Energy Human Genome Project,Dartmouth College and Franklin Pierce Law Center.1 The first session was open to the public. For the most part only registeredconferees attended the remainder of the conference. Attendance was limited, andproceedings were conducted in an open square, to encourage open discussion.2 President & Dean, Franklin Pierce Law Center.6 Risk. Health, Safety & Environment 183 [Spring 1995]Registered confereesNorman L. BalmerChief Patent CounselUnion Carbide CorporationJohnathan BenderCarnegie Commission,Science, Technology & GovernmentProfessor Halina S. Brown, ChairEnv't, Technology & Science ProgramClark UniversityProfessor George CybenkoDartmouth CollegeProfessor Charles L. DrakeDartmouth CollegeProfessor Thomas G. Field, Jr.Franklin Pierce Law CenterProfessor Lawrence HaworthUniversity of WaterlooPeter W. HuberManhattan Institute for Policy ResearchProfessor Itzhak Jacoby, DirectorDiv. of Health Serv. Admin.F. E. Hebert School of MedicineProfessor Arthur KantrowitzDartmouth CollegeJennifer A. KispertFranklin Pierce Law CenterJeffrey S. Lubbers, Research DirectorAdministrative Conference of the U.S.Professor Frank X. MassdMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyDean Donald R. MattisonGraduate School of Public HealthUniversity of PittsburghProfessor Allan MazurSyracuse UniversityProfessor Andre A. MoenssensWest Virginia College of LawProfessor Paul J. OssenbruggenUniversity of New HampshireChris Paterson, Policy AssociateNortheast Center, Comparative Risk KDr. Dalton PaxmanOffice of Technology AssessmentProfessor Sheldon J. ReavenSUNY, Stony BrookMarie C. Rounding, ChairOntario Energy BoardProfessor Michael RustadSuffolk University Law SchoolProfessor Michael J. SaksUniversity of Iowa School of LawProfessor Albert A. ScherrFranklin Pierce Law CenterProfessor Sidney A. ShapiroUniversity of Kansas School of LawProfessor Kristin S. Shrader-FrechetteUniversity of South FloridaProfessor Rena I. Steinzor, DirectorEnvironmental Law ClinicUniversity of Maryland College of LawProfessor Peter L. StraussColumbia University School of LawWilliam A Thomas, Vice PresidentEnvtl. Safety & Quality AssuranceOak Ridge Associated UniversitiesProfessor Jeanette M. TrauthUniversity of Pittsburgh[Approximately 25 others attended the,"initial session.]

Program - Which Scientist Do You Believe - Process Alternatives in Technological Controversies

https://scholars.unh.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1239&context=risk

Program - Which Scientist Do You Believe - Process Alternatives in Technological Controversies

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

UNH Scholars' Repository