Treatment of thoraco-lumbar curves in adolescent females affected by idiopathic scoliosis with a progressive action short brace (PASB): assessment of results according to the SRS committee on bracing and nonoperative management standardization criteria

Abstract

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The effectiveness of conservative treatment of scoliosis is controversial. Some studies suggest that brace is effective in stopping curve progression, whilst others did not report such an effect.</p> <p>The purpose of the present study was to effectiveness of Progressive Action Short Brace (PASB) in the correction of thoraco-lumbar curves, in agreement with the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) Committee on Bracing and Nonoperative Management Standardisation Criteria.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Fifty adolescent females (mean age 11.8 ± 0.5 years) with thoraco-lumbar curve and a pre-treatment Risser score ranging from 0 to 2 have been enrolled. The minimum duration of follow-up was 24 months (mean: 55.4 ± 44.5 months). Antero-posterior radiographs were used to estimate the curve magnitude (C<sub>M</sub>) and the torsion of the apical vertebra (T<sub>A</sub>) at 5 time points: beginning of treatment (t<sub>1</sub>), one year after the beginning of treatment (t<sub>2</sub>), intermediate time between t<sub>1 </sub>and t<sub>4 </sub>(t<sub>3</sub>), end of weaning (t<sub>4</sub>), 2-year minimum follow-up from t<sub>4 </sub>(t<sub>5</sub>). Three situations were distinguished: curve correction, curve stabilisation and curve progression.</p> <p>The Kruskal Wallis and Spearman Rank Correlation tests have been used as statistical tests.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>C<sub>M </sub>mean value was 29,30 ± 5,16 SD at t<sub>1 </sub>and 14,67 ± 7,65 SD at t<sub>5</sub>. T<sub>A </sub>was 12.70 ± 6,14 SD at t<sub>1 </sub>and 8,95 ± 5,82 at t<sub>5</sub>. The variation between measures of Cobb and Perdriolle degrees at t<sub>1,2,3,4,5 </sub>and between C<sub>M </sub>t<sub>5</sub>-t<sub>1 </sub>and T<sub>A </sub>t<sub>5</sub>-t<sub>1 </sub>were significantly different.</p> <p>Curve correction was accomplished in 94% of patients, whereas a curve stabilisation was obtained in 6% of patients.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The PASB, due to its peculiar biomechanical action on vertebral modelling, is highly effective in correcting thoraco-lumbar curves.</p

    Similar works