Baeten, Cor G. M. I.

Bouvy, Nicole D.

de Hoog, Dominique E. N. M.

Heemskerk, Jeroen

Nieman, Fred H. M.

van Gemert, Wim G.

English

PubMed

PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate recurrence and functional outcome of three surgical techniques for rectopexy: open (OR), laparoscopic (LR), and robot-assisted (RR). A case-control study was performed to study recurrence after the three operative techniques used for rectal procidentia. The secondary aim of this study was to examine the differences in functional results between the three techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent a rectopexy between January 2000 and September 2006 enrolled in this study. Peri-operative data were collected from patient records and functional outcome was assessed by telephonic questionnaire. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients (71 females, mean age 56.4 years) underwent a rectopexy for rectal procidentia. Nine patients (11%) had a recurrence; one (2%) after OR, four (27%) after LR, and four (20%) after RR. RR showed significantly higher recurrence rates when controlled for age and follow-up time compared to OR, (p = 0.027), while LR showed near-significant higher rates (p = 0.059). Functional results improved in all three operation types, without a difference between them. CONCLUSIONS: LR and RR are adequate procedures but have a higher risk of recurrence. A RCT is needed assessing the definitive role of (robotic assistance in) laparoscopic surgery in rectopexy

de Hoog, D.E.

Heemskerk, J.

Nieman, F.H.M.

van Gemert, W.G.

Baeten, C.G.

Bouvy, N.D.

NARCIS 

Recurrence and functional results after open versus conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a case-control study.

Dominique E. N. M. de Hoog

Jeroen Heemskerk

Fred H. M. Nieman

Wim G. van Gemert

Cor G. M. I. Baeten

Nicole D. Bouvy

Springer - Publisher Connector

Recurrence and functional results after open versus conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a case–control study

A comparison of open vs. laparoscopic abdominal rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a metaanalysis. Dis Colon Rectum 48(10):1930–1940

A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients.

Abdominal resection rectopexy versus Delorme's procedure for rectal prolapse: a predictable outcome.

Abdominal resection rectopexy versus Delorme's procedure for rectal prolapse: comparison of clinical and physiological outcomes.

Advantages of advanced laparoscopic systems.

Bouvy ND(2007) Robotassisted versus conventional laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: a Int J Colorectal Dis

Classic articles in colonic and rectal surgery. Edmond Delorme 1847–1929. Dis Colon Rectum 28(7):544–553

Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve?

Darzi A et al (2004) Robotic assisted rectopexy.

Finalidad de los cursos de adiestramiento practico. [Purpose of the practical training courses].

Functional results after laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse.

Gastro-intestinale chirurgie en gastro-enterologie in onderling verband. Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum,

Laparoscopic resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse.

Laparoscopic treatment of rectal prolapse: experience gained in a prospective multicenter study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 387(3–4):130–137

Long-term outcome after laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal prolapse: a case-control study.

Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse.

New operation for rectal prolapse.

Open vs. laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse: a case-controlled study assessing short-term outcome.

Postanal repair for neuropathic faecal incontinence: correlation of clinical result and anal canal pressures.

Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse.

Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Robot-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparative study on costs and time.

Robotic-assisted pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

Treatment of extensive prolapse of the rectum in aged or debilitated patients.

Recurrence and functional results after open versus conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a case–control study

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

NARCIS

Springer - Publisher Connector

Springer - Publisher Connector