CORE
πΊπ¦Β
Β make metadata, not war
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Motivation of university and non-university stakeholders to change medical education in Vietnam
Authors
AH Maslow
AP French
+29Β more
B Grigaliunas
C Schormair
EJ Ruitenberg
EP Wright
F Herzberg
FK Bellott
GJ van der Wilt
J Broerse
J Dahlstrom
JR Hackman
K Coleman
K Hubbell
LN Hoat
LN Hoat
LN Hoat
LN Hoat
LN Hoat
Luu Ngoc Hoat
M Dieleman
M O'Keefe
N King
N Lurie
Nguyen Lan Viet
R Hays
RD Lasker
S Roff
S Roff
SD Seifer
SD Seifer
Publication date
1 January 2009
Publisher
BioMed Central
Doi
Cite
View
on
PubMed
Abstract
Background. Both university and non-university stakeholders should be involved in the process of curriculum development in medical schools, because all are concerned with the competencies of the graduates. That may be difficult unless appropriate strategies are used to motivate each stakeholder. From 1999 to 2006, eight medical schools in Vietnam worked together to change the curriculum and teaching for general medical students to make it more community oriented. This paper describes the factors that motivated the different stakeholders to participate in curriculum change and teaching in Vietnamese medical schools and the activities to address those factors and have sustainable contributions from all relevant stakeholders. Methods. Case study analysis of contributions to the change process, using reports, interviews, focus group discussions and surveys and based on Herzberg's Motivation Theory to analyze involvement of different stakeholders. Results. Different stakeholders were motivated by selected activities, such as providing opportunities for non-university stakeholders to share their opinions, organizing interactions among university stakeholders, stimulating both bottom-up and top-down inputs, focusing on learning from each other, and emphasizing self-motivation factors. Conclusion. The Herzberg Motivation theory helped to identify suitable approaches to ensure that teaching topics, materials and assessment methods more closely reflected the health care needs of the community. Other medical schools undertaking a reform process may learn from this experience. Β© 2009 Hoat et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
Springer - Publisher Connector
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
Last time updated on 05/06/2019
NARCIS
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
Last time updated on 14/10/2017
Crossref
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
Last time updated on 01/04/2019
VU Research Portal
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:research.vu.nl:publication...
Last time updated on 18/04/2020
DSpace at VU
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:dare.ubvu.vu.nl:1871/23424
Last time updated on 03/09/2013
Springer - Publisher Connector
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
Last time updated on 03/05/2017
DSpace at VU
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:dare.ubvu.vu.nl:1871/23309
Last time updated on 03/09/2013