Christenhusz, Maarten

Schneider, Harald

Helsingin yliopiston digitaalinen arkisto

PHYTOTAXAISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition)Copyright © 2011 Magnolia PressPhytotaxa 28: 50–52       (2011) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ CorrectionCorrections to Phytotaxa 19: Linear sequence of lycophytes and fernsMAARTEN J.M. CHRISTENHUSZ1 & HARALD SCHNEIDER21Botany Unit, Finnish Museum of Natural History, Postbox 4, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland. E-mail: maarten.christenhusz@helsinki.fi2Department of Botany, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, SW7 5BD London, U.K. E-mail: hars@nhm.ac.ukAfter the publication of our A linear sequence of extant families and genera of lycophytes and ferns(Christenhusz, Zhang & Schneider 2011), a couple of errors were brought to our attention:Platyzoma placed in Pteris (Pteridaceae), and correcting erroneous combinations made in Pteris of Gleichenia species.In the New Combinations section on page 22, we attempted to provide new combinations for the genus Platyzoma R.Br., which is embedded in Pteris L. (Schuettpelz & Pryer 2007, Lehtonen 2011). When doing so, we made the unfortunate choice to follow the treatment of Platyzoma by Desvaux (1827), which included several additional species of Gleichenia, instead of the modern treatment of Platyzoma in which only the species Platyzoma microphyllum Brown (1810: 160) is included. Only that name needed to be transferred. This resulted in the creation of a number of unnecessary new names and combinations of Australasian Gleichenia, for which we apologise. We erroneously provided names in Pteris for Gleichenia dicarpa R.Br., G. alpina R.Br. and G. rupestris R.Br., which are all correctly placed in Gleichenia and not in Pteris. Therefore these new names are to be treated as synonyms. Gleichenia speluncae R.Br. and its combination in Pteris are synonyms of G. rupestris.To complicate matters, the combination 'Pteris microphylla' is already published earlier [by Cavanilles (in Swartz 1806: 324, nomen), by Cunningham (1836: 366), and by Colla (1836)] and is therefore not available for this taxon. We chose Platyzoma recurvum Desv. to make the combination for this taxon, an unfortunate choice, because that name is synonymous to Gleichenia microphyllum R.Br., not Platyzoma microphyllumR.Br. Unfortunately type specimens of Platyzoma ferruginea and P. latum could not be located, but based on their descriptions they appear both to be synonymous to Dicranopteris linearis (Burm.f.) Underwood (1907: 250). Of this species several varieties are known to occur in Australia and it is likely that these two names apply to different varieties, although it may not be certain to which one, due to the absence of original material to verify.Below we provide an overview of the taxa that we incorrectly applied, and we formally synonymise our superfluous new names in Pteris that are underlined for convenience.Correct names:Dicranopteris linearis (Burm.f.) Underw.Synonyms: Platyzoma ferruginea Desvaux (1827: 199), syn. nov., Pteris platyferra Christenh., syn. nov. Platyzoma latum Desvaux (1827: 199), syn. nov., Pteris platylata Christenh., syn. nov.Gleichenia alpina R.Br. Synonyms: Calymella alpina (R.Br.) C.Presl, Gleichenia dicarpa var. alpina (R.Br.) Hook.f., Mertensia alpina (R.Br.) Poir., Platyzoma alpinum (R.Br.) Desv., Pteris platyzoma Christenh., syn. nov.50       Published: 14 Sep. 2011Gleichenia dicarpa R.Br. Synonyms: Calymella dicarpa (R.Br.) C.Presl, Mertensia dicarpa (R.Br.) Poir., Platyzoma dicarpum (R.Br.) Desv., Pteris dicarpa (R.Br.) Christenh., syn. nov., Calymella major NakaiGleichenia microphylla R.Br. Synonyms: Calymella microphylla (R.Br.) C.Presl, Gleichenia circinnata var. microphylla (R.Br.) Maiden & Betche, Gleicheniastrum microphyllum (R.Br.) C.Presl, Platyzoma recurvum Desv., Pteris recurva (Desv.) Christenh., syn. nov.Gleichenia rupestris R.Br. Synonyms: Calymella rupestris (R.Br.) Ching, Gleichenia circinnata var. rupestris (R.Br.) Domin, Gleicheniastrum rupestre (R.Br.) C.Presl, Mertensia rupestris (R.Br.) Poir., Platyzoma rupestris (R.Br.) Desv., Pteris rupestris(R.Br.) Christenh., syn. nov., Gleichenia speluncae R.Br., Gleichenia circinnata var. speluncae (R.Br.) Luerss., Gleicheniastrum speluncae (R.Br.) C.Presl, Mertensia speluncae (R.Br.) Poir., Platyzoma speluncae (R.Br.) Desv., Pteris speluncae (R.Br.) Christenh., syn. nov.Pteris platyzomopsis Christenh. & H.Schneid., nom. nov. Basionym: Platyzoma microphyllum Brown (1810: 160), non P. microphylla A.Cunn. Placement of Hemidictyum in Hemidictyaceae, sister to AspleniaceaeRecent analysis including the members of our newly described Diplaziopsidaceae made us conclude that this family should consist of Diplaziopsis C.Chr. and Homalosorus Small ex Pic.Serm. only. The third genus Hemidictyum C.Presl, was tentatively included in Diplaziopsidaceae, but has since been found to be sister to Aspleniaceae (Lehtonen 2011). It should therefore either be treated as an independent family [Hemidictyaeae, fam. nov., frondes herbaceae, compositae, pinnis oppositis lanceolatis serratis; fasciculus vasorum in stipite unicus; venae pinnatae, simplices; sori lineares, elongati, dorso venae simplicis; indusium lineare, elongatum, planum. Type: Hemidictyum C.Presl (1836: 110)], or be included in Aspleniaceae (as suggested by Lehtonen 2011), although the latter is unwarranted because synapomorphies of such a broadly defined Aspleniaceae are not yet known. Moreover the separation of Hemidictyum and Aspleniaceae dates back to the Cretaceous according to current estimates of divergence times of derived ferns (Schuettpelz & Pryer 2009), and the recognition of two families will therefore be helpful for future classification of Cretaceous and early Tertiary ferns.Grammitid ferns (Polypodiaceae)The classification of grammitid ferns is still poorly understood and our treatment had several shortcomings. Barbara Parris, specialist on Old World grammitids notified us of the following errors:· Ctenopteris Blume ex Kunze is a synonym of Prosaptia C.Presl (Parris 2007). · Nematopteris Alderw. is a synonym of Scleroglossum Alderw. (Kramer & Green 1990)· Ctenopterella Parris was omitted from the list of genera. It should have been recognised (following Parris 2007).· Our typification of · Tomophyllum (E.Fourn.) Parris was superfluous. It had already been lectotypified by Parris (2007) with T. subsecundodissectum (Zoll.) Parris. We overlooked this lectotypification.The grammitids are without doubt one of the biggest challenges to curators, because the genus concepts have been changed dramatically in the recent years. Many non-expert curators will find the current situation unsatisfactory because a lot of material is currently filled under various generic names such as Ctenopteris, Grammitis Sw. and Xiphopteris Kaulf. These are now either recognized as synonyms of other genera, or have a much narrower definition. A full list of synonymy of the grammitid ferns will be necessary, after further research has established the generic delimitation in more detail. Phytotaxa 28  © 2011 Magnolia Press  •   51CORRECTIONS TO “LINEAR SEQUENCE OF LYCOPHYTES AND FERNS”A new name in Blechnum for Doodia kunthiana (Blechnaceae)Also an unfortunate choice was the new name proposed in Blechnum for Doodia kunthiana Gaudichaud (1829: 410): Blechnum norfolkense Christenh. This name was unfortunate because the taxon is endemic to Hawaii instead of Norfolk Island. It was caused by a confusion of geographical names.We therefore hereby propose the illegitimate name Blechnum hawaiianum Christenh., nom. nov. for this taxon (basionym: Doodia kunthiana Gaudichaud (1829: 410). We realise that this name will have to be formally conserved against B. norfolkense, before it can be applied, but we are convinced this name will be more appropriate.Matteuccia (Onocleaceae)In Appendix 1. Matteuccia Tod. was accepted, but it should have been correctly cited as a synonym of Onoclea L. (Onocleaceae).ReferencesBrown, R. (1810) Prodromus Florae Novae Hollandiae et Insulae Van-Diemen, etc. Nuremberg: L. Schrag.Christenhusz, M.J.M., Zhang, X.-C. & Schneider, H. (2011) A linear sequence of extant families and genera of lycophytes and ferns. Phytotaxa 19: 7–54.Colla, L.A. (1836) Herbarium pedemontanum juxta methodum naturalem depositum, vol. 6. Italy: A. Taurinorum.Cunningham, A. (1836) Florae Insularum novae zelandiae precursor; or a specimen of the botany of the islands of New Zealand. Filices. Companion to the Botanical Magazine 2: 361–369.Desvaux, N.A. (1827) Prodrome de la famille des fougères. Mémoires de la Société linnéenne de Paris 6: 171–337.Gaudichaud, C. (1829) Voyage autour du monde fait par ordre du roi, etc. (Uranie), par M. Louis de Freycinet, Botanique. Paris: Pillet Ainé.Kramer, K.U. & Green, P.S. (1990) Pteridophytes and gymnosperms. In: Kubitzki, K. (ed.) The families and genera of vascular plants, vol. 1. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 404 pp.Lehtonen, S. (2011) Towards resolving the complete fern tree of life. PLoS ONE, in press.Parris, B.S. (2007) Five new genera and three new species of Grammitidaceae (Filicales) and the re-establishment of Oreogrammitis. The Gardens’ Bulletin Singapore 58: 233–274.Presl, C.B. (1836) Tentamen Pteridographiae. Prague: T. Haasse.Schuettpelz, E. & Pryer, K.M. (2007) Fern phylogeny inferred from 400 leptosporangiate species and three plastid genes. Taxon 56: 1037–1050.Schuettpelz, E. & Pryer, K.M. (2009) Evidence for a Cenozoic radiation of ferns in an angiosperm-dominated canopy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 106: 11200–11205.Swartz, O. (1806) Synopsis filicum earum genera et species systematice complectens. Kiel: impensis Bibliopolii novi academici, 445 pp.Underwood, L.M. (1907) American ferns — VIII. A preliminary review of the North American Gleicheniaceae. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 34: 243–262. CHRISTENHUSZ & SCHNEIDER52   •  Phytotaxa 28  © 2011 Magnolia Press

Corrections to Phytotaxa 19: Linear sequence of lycophytes and ferns

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Helsingin yliopiston digitaalinen arkisto