CORE
🇺🇦
make metadata, not war
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
TSP和PM10监测指标对新疆城市空气质量级别的影响/Influence of monitoring index TSP and PM10 on ambient air quality grade at cities of Xinjiang, China[J]
Authors
CHEN Huan-sheng
GUO Yu-hong
+16 more
JI Yuan
KANG Hong
LI Jie
WANG Zi-fa
ZHANG Xiao-xiao
中国科学院大学,北京100049
中国科学院大气物理研究所,北京100029
中国科学院新疆生态与地理研究所,荒漠与绿洲生态国家重点实验室,新疆乌鲁木齐830011
康宏
张小啸
新疆环境监测总站,新疆乌鲁木齐830011
李杰
王自发
纪元
郭宇宏
陈焕盛
Publication date
1 January 2014
Publisher
Abstract
以新疆干旱区绿洲城市为研究对象,对2005-2008、2011年TSP和PM1o监测指标数据进行相关性分析,对比研究TSP与PM10监测指标对应的API污染指数分布和空气质量等级.结果显示:这两种大气颗粒物指标对新疆干旱区城市环境空气质量级别的影响显著,在春季沙尘多发期和冬季采暖期,以TSP标准评估的API空气质量等级与PM10为评价标准的空气质量结果偏离明显;监测指标采用PM10代替TSP后,城市环境空气质量出现较大幅度提升,环境空气质量优良率偏高,年均污染天数减少约50~ 60 d,以PM10作为空气质量监测指标的空气质量级别严重偏低,无法真实评价干旱区城市的空气质量现状,而TSP作为评价指标则更能如实反映当地空气质量的真实状况,建议在新疆城市在开展PM10监测的同时不应简单废弃TSP监测指标,TSP监测指标在干旱区环境空气质量监测体系中应该继续保留,同时建议在今后环境空气质量标准修订中适当收严PM10的日均值标准,使评价结果与TSP和PM10两指标评价结果不至于相差悬殊
Similar works
Full text
Available Versions
Institutional Repository of Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, CAS
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:ir.xjlas.org:365004/14394
Last time updated on 29/11/2016