These proceedings summarize the first MiniBooNE electron antineutrino appearance search results, corresponding to a data sample collected for 3.39 x 10{sup 20} protons on target (POT). The search serves as a direct test of the LSND oscillation signature, and provides complementary information which can be used in studies addressing the MiniBooNE neutrino-mode low-energy excess

Collaboration, for the MiniBooNE

Karagiorgi, Georgia S.

UNT Digital Library

arXiv:0910.0263v1  [hep-ex]  1 Oct 2009 New Results from MiniBooNE: A Search for ElectronAntineutrino Appearance at ∼1 eV2G. Karagiorgi, for the MiniBooNE CollaborationMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USASummary. — These proceedings summarize the first MiniBooNE electron an-tineutrino appearance search results, corresponding to a data sample collected for3.39×1020 protons on target (POT). The search serves as a direct test of the LSNDoscillation signature, and provides complementary information which can be usedin studies addressing the MiniBooNE neutrino-mode low-energy excess.14.60.Lm, 14.60.Pq, 14.60.St1. – The MiniBooNE and LSND anomaliesThe MiniBooNE experiment has performed a search for ν̄µ → ν̄e oscillations at large∆m2 [1], an oscillation signature that had been observed by the LSND experiment, with3.8σ significance [2]. This oscillation interpretation relies on the existence of a fourth,sterile neutrino mass eigenstate, with ∆m2 ∼ 0.1-100 eV2. Mixing via this fourth masseigenstate can lead to a small probability amplitude for ν̄µ → ν̄e and νµ → νe oscillationsat L[m]/E[MeV ] ∼ 1. MiniBooNE has previously searched for this type of oscillationusing a neutrino beam [3], and, under the assumption of CPT conservation, has excludedthe LSND interpretation 98% confidence level (CL) [3]. At the same time, the searchrevealed an excess of νe events at low energy [4], which is inconsistent with the LSNDexcess under the a single sterile neutrino oscillation hypothesis; however, extensions ofc© Società Italiana di Fisica 1FERMILAB-CONF-09-476-PPD2 G. Karagiorgi, for the MiniBooNE Collaborationthis model [5] offer the possibility of reconsiling the MiniBooNE neutrino results withthe LSND antineutrino result. These models involve large CP violation which leads todifferent probabilities for νµ → νe as opposed to ν̄µ → ν̄e oscillations. Other models [6]have also been suggested as explanations, some of which offer predictions for antineutrinorunning at MiniBooNE. In order to provide another handle on the low-energy excess,MiniBooNE was approved in 2007 for extended antineutrino running [7], which alsoenabled MiniBooNE to perform a direct test of the LSND oscillation interpretation,using antineutrinos.2. – The MiniBooNE Electron Antineutrino Appearance SearchThe MiniBooNE experiment uses 8 GeV protons incident on a beryllium target inorder to produce mesons which subsequently decay to generate the neutrino beam. Amagnetic field is used at the target to focus positively charged mesons in the forwarddirection, and defocus negatively charged mesons, to produce a neutrino beam. Reversingthe polarity of the magnetic field allows MiniBooNE to switch from a neutrino to anantineutrino beam. The flux [8] consists primarily of ν̄µ and νµ. The low νe and ν̄e contentof the beam minimizes the background to the oscillation search, ensuring sensitivity tosmall-amplitude (of order 10−3) oscillations. The ν̄µ flux has a mean energy of ∼600MeV. The MiniBooNE detector [9] is located at L=541 m from the proton target. Thisestablishes an L/E similar to LSND, and therefore sensitivity to ∆m2 ∼ 1 eV2. Thedetector is a spherical tank, 12 meters in diameter, filled with mineral oil and lined withphotomultiplier tubes (PMTs). The particle detection and identification method relieson the detection of cherenkov and scintillation light emitted by outgoing charged particleswhich are produced in neutrino interactions.The antineutrino oscillation analysis [1] employs the same analysis chain that wasimplemented in neutrino mode [4]. The analysis relies on differentiation between a ma-jority of ν̄µ charged-current quasi-elastic (CCQE) events, and ν̄e CCQE events, whichare the signal. A track-based event reconstruction is implemented, which uses PMT hittopology and timing to identify electron-like or muon-like cherenkov rings from the cor-responding CCQE interactions. The ν̄e and ν̄µ CCQE spectra are fitted simultaneouslyas a function of reconstructed antineutrino energy, EQEν , and the oscillation parameters∆m2 and sin2 2θ are extracted. The ν̄µ CCQE prediction is used in the fit in order toprovide a constraint to the ν̄e CCQE prediction, as both spectra are correlated throughflux and cross section systematics.The ν̄e CCQE background prediction, for 3.39×1020 POT, is shown in fig. 1. Thebackground is dominated at low energy by mis-identified ν̄µ events, such as neutral-current (NC) π0 interactions. That is because MiniBooNE cannot differentiate between asingle photon or a single electron produced in the detector. At high energy, the dominantbackground is CCQE interactions of intrinsic ν̄e from the beam, produced in K andπ → µ decays. The sensitivity to ν̄µ → ν̄e oscillations is shown in fig. 2. The MiniBooNEsensitivity provides substantial coverage of the lower ∆m2 region allowed at 90% CL bya joint analysis of LSND and KARMEN [10] data [1].New Results from MiniBooNE: A Search for Electron Antineutrino Appearance at ∼1 eV23Fig. 1. – MonteCarlo background prediction and observed data as a function of reconstructedneutrino energy for the present antineutrino data sample corresponding to 3.39×1020 POT.Fig. 2. – The antineutrino sensitivity and limit to LSND-allowed ν̄µ → ν̄e oscillations, from fitsto 200 < EQEν < 3000 MeV. The MiniBooNE antineutrino dataset corresponds to 3.39×1020POT. Also shown is the limit from KARMEN [10].4 G. Karagiorgi, for the MiniBooNE CollaborationTable I. – The χ2-probability that each hypothesis explains the observed number of low-energyneutrino and antineutrino events, assuming only statistical, fully correlated systematic, and fullyuncorrelated systematic errors. A proper treatment of systematic correlations is in progress.Hypothesis stat.-only stat. and correlated sys. stat and uncorrelated sys.Same σ 0.1% 0.1% 6.7%π0 scaled 3.6% 6.4% 21.5%POT scaled 0.0% 0.0% 1.8%BKGD scaled 2.7% 4.7% 19.2%CC scaled 2.9% 5.2% 19.9%Kaon scaled 0.1% 0.1% 5.9%ν scaled 38.4% 51.4% 58.0%3. – ResultsThe reconstructed energy spectrum of ν̄e CCQE data is shown in fig. 1, overlaid onthe predicted ν̄e CCQE background. At energies above 475 MeV, the data agree withthe background prediction within systematic and statistical uncertainties. The 475-675MeV energy region shows a 2.8σ data fluctuation above background prediction. Thisfluctuation forces the MiniBooNE limit, shown in fig. 2, to be significantly worse thanthe sensitivity at lower ∆m2. The MiniBooNE best oscillation fit corresponds to (∆m2 =4.4 eV2, sin2 2θ = 0.004).Interestingly, the low-energy region (200-475 MeV) shows no evidence of an excess.In this range, MiniBooNE observes 61 events, compared to a background expectationof 61.5±11.7 (sys+stat) events. Table I shows the probability (from a two-parameterfit to the data) that each of the following hypotheses explains the observed number oflow-energy neutrino and antineutrino events: 1) Same σ: Same NC cross section forneutrinos and antineutrinos. 2) π0 scaled: Scaled to the number of NC π0 events. 3)POT scaled: Scaled to number of POT. 4) BKGD scaled: Scaled to the total number ofbackground events. 5) CC scaled: Scaled to the number of CC events. 5) Kaon scaled:Scaled to the number of low-energy K events. 6) Neutrino scaled: Scaled to the numberof neutrino events. The same σ, POT scaled, and Kaon scaled hypotheses are disfavoredas explanations of the MiniBooNE low-energy excess. The most preferred model is thatwhere the low-energy excess is contributed from only neutrinos in the beam.4. – ConclusionMiniBooNE has performed a blind analysis for ν̄µ → ν̄e oscillations. The ν̄e data isfound in agreement with the background prediction as a function of EQEν . No strongevidence for oscillations in antineutrino mode has been found, given the current statis-tics. Interestingly, there is no evidence of significant excess at low energy in antineutrinomode. This has already placed constraints to various suggested low-energy excess in-terpretations. MiniBooNE is currently collecting more antineutrino data, for a total ofNew Results from MiniBooNE: A Search for Electron Antineutrino Appearance at ∼1 eV255.0×1020 POT, and has been approved for further running, to collect a total of 10.×1020POT. This will improve sensitivity to oscillations, and allow further investigation ofthe neutrino-mode low-energy excess. Additional information will be provided by theNuMI-beam neutrinos detected at MiniBooNE [11].REFERENCES[1] Aguilar-Arevalo A. A. et al., preprint arXiv:0904.1958 [hep-ex].[2] Athanassopoulos C. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 75 (1995) 2650; 77 (1996) 3082; 81 (1998)1774; Aguilar-Arevalo A. A. et al., Phys. Rev. D, 64 (2001) 112007.[3] Aguilar-Arevalo A. A. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 98 (2007) 231801.[4] Aguilar-Arevalo A. A. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 102 (2009) 101802.[5] Sorel M. et al., Phys. Rev. D, 70 (2004) 073004; Maltoni M. and Schwetz T., Phys.Rev. D, 76 (2007) 093005; Karagiorgi G., AIP Conf. Proc., 981 (2008) 210.[6] Harvey J. A. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 99 (2007) 261601; Phys. Rev. D (77) 2008085017;Pas H. et al., Phys. Rev. D, 72 (2005) 095017; Goldman T. et al., Phys. Rev. D, 75 (2007)091301; Nelson A. E. and Walsh J., Phys. Rev. D, 77 (2008) 033001; Kostelecky V. A.and Mewes M., Phys. Rev. D, 69 (2004) 016005; Katori T. et al., Phys. Rev. D, 74 (2006)105009; Giunti C. and Laveder M., Phys. Rev. D, 77 (2008) 093002.[7] Aguilar-Arevalo A. A. et al., Addendum to the MiniBooNE Run Plan: MiniBooNEPhysics in 2006 2006.[8] Aguilar-Arevalo A. A. et al., Phys. Rev. D, 79 (2009) 072002.[9] Aguilar-Arevalo A. A. et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A, 599 (2009) 28.[10] Armbruster B. et al., Phys. Rev. D, 65 (2002) 112001.[11] Adamson P. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 102 (2008) 211801.

New Results from MiniBooNE: A Search for Electron Antineutrino Appearance at $\sim$ 1 eV $^2$

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

UNT Digital Library

New Results from MiniBooNE: A Search for Electron Antineutrino Appearance at ∼\sim∼1 eV2^22

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

UNT Digital Library

New Results from MiniBooNE: A Search for Electron Antineutrino Appearance at $\sim$ 1 eV $^2$