CORE
CO
nnecting
RE
positories
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Research partnership
About
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Community governance
Governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
Innovations
Our research
Labs
research
Provision for students with learning difficulties in general colleges of further education - have we been going round in circles?
Authors
Ainley
Anderson
+30 more
Browne
Corbett
Corbett
Creswell
Dee
Dee
DES (Department of Education and Science)
DES (Department of Education and Science)
DES (Department of Education and Science)
DES (Department of Education and Science)
DES (Department of Education and Science)
DES (Department of Education and Science)
DfE (Department for Education)
DfES (Department for Education and Skills)
DfES (Department for Education and Skills)
FEFC (Further Education Funding Council)
FEFC (Further Education Funding Council)
FEFC (Further Education Funding Council)
FEU (Further Education Unit)
Harris
Hewitson
Johnstone
Mertens
Mittler
Moustakas
Stowell
Stowell
Tomlinson
UNESCO
Visser
Publication date
28 February 2006
Publisher
'Wiley'
Doi
Abstract
This is a PDF version of an article published in British journal of special education© 2006. The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com.This article discusses the current situation for students with severe learning difficulties in general colleges of further education. Findings are presented from a critical review of the literature and a small-scale preliminary investigation which set out to explore the idea that, despite radical changes to the special school sector and to the structure and organisation of further education, provision in colleges of further education for these students is poorly focused. Students with severe learning difficulties experience provision that is, at best, circuitous and repetitive and that, at worst, leads individuals back into dependence, unemployment and social segregation. Using the outcomes of interviews and the scrutiny of inspection reports, a searching critique of current practice and an interesting set of recommendations for ways in which the situation could be radically reviewed and improved is provided
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
ChesterRep
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:chesterrep.openrepository....
Last time updated on 06/03/2012
Crossref
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
Last time updated on 05/06/2019