Allam, E. S

Grewal, S. G

Johnson, D. Y

Johnson, F. E

Digital Commons@Becker

Washington University School of MedicineDigital Commons@BeckerOpen Access Publications2015Inguinoscrotal herniation of the ureter: Descriptionof five casesE. S. AllamSaint Louis UniversityD. Y. JohnsonSaint Louis UniversityS. G. GrewalWashington University School of Medicine in St. LouisF. E. JohnsonSaint Louis UniversityFollow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/open_access_pubsThis Open Access Publication is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons@Becker. It has been accepted for inclusion in OpenAccess Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Becker. For more information, please contact engeszer@wustl.edu.Recommended CitationAllam, E. S.; Johnson, D. Y.; Grewal, S. G.; and Johnson, F. E., ,"Inguinoscrotal herniation of the ureter: Description of five cases."International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.14,. 160-163. (2015).http://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/open_access_pubs/4108CASE  REPORT  –  OPEN  ACCESSInternational Journal of Surgery Case Reports 14 (2015) 160–163Contents lists available at ScienceDirectInternational  Journal  of  Surgery  Case  Reportsj ourna l h om epage: www.caserepor ts .comInguinoscrotal  herniation  of  the  ureter:  Description  of  ﬁve  casesAllam  E.S. a,1,  Johnson  D.Y.a,2, Grewal  S.G.b,3, Johnson  F.E. a,c,∗a St. Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United Statesb Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO,  United Statesc St. Louis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, St. Louis, MO, United Statesa  r  t  i  c  l e  i  n  f  oArticle history:Received 13 April 2015Received in revised form 28 May  2015Accepted 27 June 2015Available online 21 July 2015a  b  s  t  r  a  c  tINTRODUCTION:  Descent  of  the ureter  into  the  inguinal  canal  or scrotum  is  rare but undoubtedly  under-reported.  Most  known  cases  were  recognized  at  the time  of  surgery  for hernia  repair.  We  encounteredﬁve  cases  recently.PRESENTATION  OF  CASE:  We  reviewed  the records  and  CT images  of  ﬁve  patients  with  inguinal  herniascontaining  a segment  of  the  ureter.  All  of our cases,  like  most  reported  cases,  featured  obese  adult  males.Our cases  had  different  outcomes,  ranging  from  inadvertent  injury  of  the displaced  ureter  to correctionof  the  anomaly  at the  time  of hernia  repair.DISCUSSION:  In all  of  our  cases,  the  affected  ureter  was  displaced  anteriorly  from  the  psoas  muscle  bygreater  than  1  cm  at the  level  of  the  L4  vertebra  on  abdominal  CT.  This  association  has  not  been  previouslydescribed.CONCLUSION:  Pre-operative  diagnosis  by  CT can  prevent  injury  to  the  ureter.  We  hypothesize  that  anteriordisplacement  of  the  ureter  at the  level  of  L4  as  seen  on CT may  be  predictive  of inguinoscrotal  herniationof the  ureter.©  2015  The  Authors.  Published  by  Elsevier  Ltd. on behalf  of Surgical  Associates  Ltd.  This  is an  openaccess  article  under  the CC BY-NC-ND  license  (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).1. IntroductionDescent of the distal aspect of the ureter into the inguinal canalor scrotum is a rare condition. There are 64 cases of inguinoscrotalherniation of the ureter in the English language literature [1]. Mostreported cases were noted at the time of surgical exploration foringuinal hernia repair, or later as a result of an operative injury.In ﬁve years, we encountered ﬁve patients with inguinal herniasin whom the ipsilateral ureter coursed into the inguinal canal orscrotum before ascending to enter the bladder at the usual site.2. Presentation of casesWe  describe pertinent clinical and imaging details of our ﬁvecases. None of the patients had a history of prior inguinal or ureteralsurgery. All were very obese. We  scrutinized the available clinicalrecords and imaging studies, searching for anatomic details thatmight be helpful in predicting the ureteral abnormality. We  found∗ Corresponding author at: St. Louis University School of Medicine, Department ofSurgery, 3635 Vista Avenue at Grand Blvd., PO Box 15250, St. Louis, MO 63110-0250,United States. Tel.: +1 314 920 1403; fax: +1 314 771 1945.E-mail address: frank.johnson1@va.gov (J. F.E.).1 Tel.: +1 314 698 6513; fax: +1 314 268 5116.2 Tel.: +1 314 707 6542; fax: +1 919 684 7151.3 Tel.: +1 918 630 8701; fax: +1 314 367 5016.no articles or abstracts describing CT evidence that identiﬁes thisaberrant ureteral course when otherwise unsuspected.2.1. Patient 1This was  a 57-year-old extremely obese (BMI of 55 kg/m2)Caucasian man  who had a symptomatic communicating righthydrocele. Hernia repair and fenestration of the hydrocele was per-formed via an inguinal incision. Abdominal-pelvic CT before andimmediately after surgery did not reveal a dilated right ureter. Thepost-operative course was  complicated by wound drainage. Sev-eral months later, repeat CT disclosed marked right hydronephrosis(Fig. 1a) with renal atrophy due to injury of the ureter in the areaof the hernia repair (Fig. 1c and d). As measured on CT, the rightureter was  1.4 cm anterior to the psoas muscle at the L3–L4 inter-vertebral level and 2.2 cm anterior to the psoas muscle at L4–L5(Fig. 1b). The left ureter could not be deﬁnitively identiﬁed on thisstudy. Subsequent renal scan revealed minimal function of the rightkidney.2.2. Patient 2This was  a 63-year-old extremely obese (BMI of 40 kg/m2)African American man  who was  evaluated for chronic renal insufﬁ-ciency and found to have marked right hydronephrosis. He alsohad a large right indirect inguinal hernia. Abdominal-pelvic CTrevealed that the ureter coursed close to the hernia (Fig. 2b).http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2015.06.0442210-2612/© 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. on behalf of Surgical Associates Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).CASE  REPORT  –  OPEN  ACCESSA. E.S. et al. / International Journal of Surgery Case Reports 14 (2015) 160–163 161Fig. 1. Post-operative venous phase CT images of Patient 1. Image quality is degraded due to incomplete projection artifact where the patient’s body exceeds the ﬁeld ofview.  (a) Right renal atrophy and severe hydronephrosis (arrow). (b) Dilated right ureter (arrow) displaced anteriorly from the psoas muscle (*) at the level of L4–L5. (c) Rightureter  (arrow) in the inguinal hernia. (d) Right ureter (arrow) in the inguinal hernia with adjacent fat stranding reﬂecting post-operative changes.Fig. 2. Pre-operative non-contrast CT and ﬂuoroscopic images of Patient 2. (a). Right ureter (straight arrow) displaced anteriorly from the psoas muscle (*) at the level ofL4–L5.  Compare this to the normally positioned left ureter (curved arrow) in close proximity to the psoas muscle (*). (b) Right ureter (straight arrow) in the inguinal hernia.(c)  Anterograde nephrostogram with the patient in prone position at the time of nephrostomy tube insertion. The right ureter loops below the level of the pubic symphysisinto  a large right inguinal hernia (one arrow) with evidence of obstruction at the level of the ureterovesical junction (two arrows).CASE  REPORT  –  OPEN  ACCESS162 A. E.S. et al. / International Journal of Surgery Case Reports 14 (2015) 160–163Fig. 3. Pre-operative venous phase CT images of Patient 3. (a) Left ureter (arrow)displaced anteriorly from the psoas muscle (*). (b) Left ureter (arrow) in the inguinalhernia.The CT also demonstrated marked deviation of the right ureterin its mid-course, measuring 3.7 cm anterior to the psoas muscleat L3–L4 and 3.1 cm at L4–L5 (Fig. 2a). The left ureter was  poorlyvisualized but was approximately 1.1 cm anterior to the psoas mus-cle at L3–L4 and 0.3 cm at L4–L5. Attempted retrograde ureteralstent placement was unsuccessful; subsequent placement of aright percutaneous nephrostomy tube was successful. Antegradenephrostogram revealed a tortuous right ureter looping below thelevel of the pubic symphysis into the inguinal hernia, with evidenceof obstruction at the level of the ureterovesical junction (Fig. 2c).The patient was managed with inguinal exploration, herniorrha-phy, resection of redundant ureter, and ureterocystostomy. Theright hydronephrosis resolved promptly.2.3. Patient 3This was a 46-year-old obese (exact BMI  not known) man  witha massive noncommunicating hydrocele and chronic left scrotalswelling. On abdominal-pelvic CT scan, he was found to have a lefthydrocele and indirect inguinal hernia containing colon and the leftureter (Fig. 3b). The left ureter was displaced anteriorly from thepsoas muscle by 1 cm at the level of L4–L5 (Fig. 3a). The CT scan alsorevealed severe left hydroureteronephrosis with an atrophic leftkidney. A MAG-3 (mercaptoacetyltriglycine) renal scan conﬁrmeda nonfunctioning left kidney. The patient underwent exploratorylaparotomy, reduction of the displaced viscera, repair of the hernia,hydrocelectomy, and scrotoplasty. The left ureter was identiﬁedover the psoas muscle through the midline incision and ligated atthe level of the external iliac vessels to prevent ascending infection.The patient recovered well.Fig. 4. Pre-operative urographic phase CT images of Patient 4. The ureters are opaci-ﬁed with contrast. (a) Normal left ureter (curved arrow) within 1 cm of the psoasmuscle (*). (b) Right ureter (straight arrow) displaced anteriorly from the psoasmuscle (*) at L4–L5. (c) Right ureter (straight arrow) in the inguinal hernia.2.4. Patient 4This was a 52-year-old obese (BMI of 33 kg/m2) Caucasian manwith a history of midline ventral hernia status post repair. A non-contrast CT demonstrated a separate right inguinal hernia with theright ureter in close proximity. Therefore, CT urography was  per-formed which conﬁrmed that the right ureter entered the hernia(Fig. 4c) before coursing posteriorly and inserting into the blad-der. There was  no hydronephrosis or hydroureter. The right ureterwas 1.2 cm anterior to the psoas muscle at L4 (Fig. 4b) whereasthe normal left ureter was only 0.2 cm anterior to the psoas mus-cle at the same level (Fig. 4a). The patient’s renal function wasnormal. Awareness of this ureteral anomaly prompted a urologicconsultation. Pre-operative cystoscopic right ureteral stent place-ment was performed which assisted in identiﬁcation of the ureterCASE  REPORT  –  OPEN  ACCESSA. E.S. et al. / International Journal of Surgery Case Reports 14 (2015) 160–163 163Fig. 5. Pre-operative urographic phase CT image of Patient 5 demonstrating a dis-tended left ureter (arrow) entrapped within the inguinal hernia. No excretion ofcontrast is seen into this ureter. The bladder wall is thickened consistent withchronic atony (#).and avoided ureteral injury during surgery. The stent was  removedimmediately after the hernia repair.2.5. Patient 5This was a 69-year-old obese (BMI of 36 kg/m2) Caucasian manwith a history of penile cancer status post partial penectomy 7years earlier. He reported increasing swelling and discomfort inhis left groin. His renal function was normal. Of note, the patienthad an atonic bladder and required clean intermittent cather-ization. CT urography showed severe left hydronephrosis andhydroureter with the distal left ureter clearly extending into aleft inguinal hernia. The left kidney was atrophic consistent withchronic obstruction. The left ureter was compressed as it enteredand exited the hernia neck with dilatation of the entrapped ureterwithin the hernia (Fig. 5). The posterior aspect of the dilated leftureter was 1.0 cm anterior to the psoas muscle at the level of L4whereas the normal right ureter was only 0.1 cm anterior to thepsoas muscle at this level. Given the tortuosity of the left ureter,ureteric stent placement was deemed unfeasible. A left percuta-neous nephrostomy tube was inserted for decompression prior tosuccessful herniorrhaphy.3. DiscussionInguinal hernia is a common indication for surgery and theureter is rarely drawn toward or into the scrotum because of adhe-sion to the posterior wall of the hernia sac [2]. They are found morefrequently in obese men  during the ﬁfth to sixth decades of life[3]. Most are asymptomatic. Urinary symptoms such as dysuria,frequency, and urgency may  be present, but these symptoms arenon-speciﬁc and may  not raise the suspicion of ureteroinguinal her-niation [4]. It is important to diagnose this anomaly because thereis a high risk of iatrogenic injury to the ureter at the time of herniarepair if the condition is not recognized.Our ﬁve cases had markedly different outcomes. In Patient 1(Section 2.1), lack of knowledge of the anomaly resulted in inad-vertent injury to the displaced ureter and subsequent loss of renalfunction. In Patient 2 (Section 2.2), awareness of the anomalyprompted surgical intervention that corrected the obstructiveuropathy. In Patient 3 (Section 2.3), awareness of the lack of func-tion in the affected kidney allowed ligation of the obstructed ureter,thus minimizing the risk of subsequent upper urinary tract infec-tion. In Patient 4 (Section 2.4), the displaced ureter was recognizedand temporarily stented prior to hernia repair to decrease the risk ofureteral injury. In Patient 5 (Section 2.5), the ureter was entrappedand obstructed in the inguinal hernia, and a percutaneous nephros-tomy was required for decompression.In each case, abdominal-pelvic CT revealed an abnormal courseof the mid-portion of the ureter that accompanied the anomalyseen more distally. The ureter with the abnormal pelvic course alsohad an abnormal position at the L4 level, lying in retroperitonealfat markedly anterior to the psoas muscle by at least 1 cm in allﬁve cases. In contrast, the ureter with the normal proximal courseimmediately anterior to the psoas muscle also had a normal dis-tal course, best depicted in Fig. 2a. This deviation of the herniatedureter in its mid-course was  evident on CT even without a dedicatedurographic phase of contrast. None of the prior reports mention thisrelationship.4. ConclusionPre-operative diagnosis of inguinoscrotal herniation of theureter, when available, enables the surgeon to avoid accidentaldamage to the ureter during a groin operation. All cases describedin this series occurred in obese men. We  hypothesize that ante-rior displacement of the ureter from the ipsilateral psoas muscleby greater than 1 cm at the level of the L4 vertebra as seen on CTis associated with inguinoscrotal herniation of the ureter. Furtherinvestigation is required and should stratify subjects by BMI.References[1] M.T. Oruc¸ , Z. Akbulut, O. Ozozan, F. Cos¸ kun, Urological ﬁndings in inguinal her-nias: a case report and review of the literature, Hernia 8 (1) (2004) 76–79.[2] M.  Giglio, M.  Medica, F. Germinale, et al., Scrotal extraperitoneal hernia of theureter: case report and literature review, Urol. Int. 66 (3) (2001) 166–168.[3] J.L. Ballard, R.M. Dobbs, J.M. Malone, Ureteroinguinal hernia: a rare companionof  sliding inguinal hernias, Am.  Surg. 57 (11) (1991) 720–722.[4] E. Akpinar, B. Turkbey, O. Ozcan, et al., Bilateral scrotal extraperitoneal herni-ation of ureters: computed tomography urographic ﬁndings and review of theliterature, J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 29 (6) (2005) 790–792.Open AccessThis article is published Open Access at sciencedirect.com. It is distributed under the IJSCR Supplemental terms and conditions, whichpermits unrestricted non commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source arecredited.

Inguinoscrotal herniation of the ureter: Description of five cases

http://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5112&context=open_access_pubs

Inguinoscrotal herniation of the ureter: Description of five cases

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Digital Commons@Becker