Andreuzza, Sebastien

Siddiqi, Imran

English

PubMed

Publications of the IAS Fellows

Perspective
Spindle Positioning, Meiotic Nonreduction, and
Polyploidy in Plants
Sebastien Andreuzza, Imran Siddiqi*
Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, India
Polyploidy, the state of having more than
two sets of chromosomes, is common in
flowering plants (angiosperms), including
the major crops [1]. Indeed, it is estimated
that 30%–80% of the angiosperms are
polyploids [2], and most diploid plant
species, including Arabidopsis thaliana, show
evidence of genome duplication in their
ancestry [3]. Polyploidy is accompanied by
genome-wide changes in gene expression
and epigenetic modifications, leading to
phenotypic diversity and rapid adaptation
[4]. Doubling of chromosome number can
also rescue and stabilize interspecific hy-
brids that would otherwise show a high
degree of sterility due to failures in meiosis.
Thus, polyploidy is thought to be a driving
force in plant evolution and speciation [5].
In this issue of PLoS Genetics, d’Erfurth and
colleagues report on the molecular charac-
terization of the AtPS1 gene and show that
lesions in the gene result in unreduced
gametes, which are believed to be an
important step in polyploidization [6].
While polyploids can originate by an
increase of chromosome number either
during somatic growth or during meiosis,
the major route is now considered to be
via the formation of unreduced gametes
[7]. The formation of 2n gametes resulting
from failure of reduction during meiosis
occurs in several plant species and can give
rise to triploids that can serve as a bridge
to the establishment of an even set of
chromosomes in subsequent generations
[8]. Unreduced gametes have also been
used in breeding schemes for crop im-
provement wherein beneficial traits have
been introduced from diploid relatives into
cultivated polyploid species [9].
The paper by d’Erfurth et al. [6] provides
the first molecular insight into high-efficien-
cy unreduced pollen formation in plants
based on analysis of mutants in the Arabi-
dopsis gene AtPS1 that produce diploid
pollen. A range of meiotic abnormalities
can give rise to unreduced gamete forma-
tion. These can be broadly classified as first
or second division restitution (FDR and
SDR, respectively) [2]. The occurrence of
parallel spindles at meiosis II, resulting in a
single plane of cell division and formation of
dyad spores, is a frequently found mecha-
nism for 2n gamete formation and is
genetically equivalent to FDR in that it
results in retention of heterozygosity for
centromeric markers (Figure 1). The parallel
spindle 1 (ps1) mutant of potato, which
produces unreduced pollen by such a
mechanism, was described more than 80
years ago [10] and has been used in potato
breeding for introgression of beneficial traits
in cultivated strains [11]. While the occur-
rence of unreduced gamete formation in
plants has long been recognized, the molec-
ular mechanisms leading to diploid gamete
formation have only recently begun to be
uncovered [12,13].
d’Erfurth et al. identified the AtPS1 gene
using a novel bioinformatics approach.
They looked for genes whose expression
pattern in microarrays correlated with that
of known meiotic genes. Subsequent
analysis showed that T-DNA insertions
in AtPS1 result in the production of diploid
pollen, and triploidy in as many as 30% of
progeny. The authors then show, by
elegant genetic and cytological experi-
ments, that the atps1 mutant phenotype
results from the positioning of the spindles
at metaphase II in a parallel orientation
instead of in the normal tetrahedral
configuration. In most angiosperms, in-
cluding Arabidopsis, cytokinesis at the time
of meiosis occurs only after the second
round of chromosome segregation. The
occurrence of parallel spindles at meiosis
II in atps1 thus results in the formation of
one plane of division, and gives rise to
dyads containing diploid spores instead of
a tetrad of haploid spores (Figure 1).
Interestingly, AtPS1 is a plant-specific
gene that encodes a protein containing an
N-terminal Forkhead Associated (FHA)
domain. FHA domains are phosphopro-
tein binding modules and are found in
proteins that regulate signal transduction
pathways in several different contexts:
plant meristem homeostasis, DNA repair,
and cell cycle control [14]. The identifi-
cation of AtPS1 opens a new window on
the control of meiosis II, particularly in
relation to spindle orientation.
The spindle pole body (SPB) and the
centrosome are the yeast and animal
microtubule organizing centers (MTOCs),
respectively. MTOCs nucleate microtu-
bules and orient the spindle during cell
division [15]. Within the SPB and centro-
some is a pair of centrioles that contain c-
tubulin, the site of nucleation of microtu-
bules [16]. Although c-tubulin is con-
served in eukaryotes, land plants lack a
conspicuous MTOC in the form of a
centrosome. Nucleation of microtubules
occurs in the cortical cytoplasm and on the
nuclear envelope from sites along existing
microtubules that are marked by c-tubulin
[17]. Microtubule nucleation in plants
therefore appears to be spatially distribut-
ed within the cell. A number of reports
point to c-tubulin as the plant MTOC, but
the precise mechanism underlying orien-
tation of the spindle and its relation to
spindle biogenesis during cell division in
plants remains to be established [18]. The
identification of AtPS1 and its role in
controlling spindle orientation during mei-
osis II represents an important step in
understanding the control of spindle
positioning in plants, and determination
of its mode of action would be of
continued interest. Importantly, because
unreduced gametes are of agronomic
value, the discovery of AtPS1 may also
benefit crop biotechnology.
Citation: Andreuzza S, Siddiqi I (2008) Spindle Positioning, Meiotic Nonreduction, and Polyploidy in
Plants. PLoS Genet 4(11): e1000272. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000272
Published November 28, 2008
Copyright:  2008 Andreuzza, Siddiqi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any
medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
* E-mail: imran@ccmb.res.in
PLoS Genetics | www.plosgenetics.org 1 November 2008 | Volume 4 | Issue 11 | e1000272
References
1. Leitch AH, Leitch IJ (2008) Genomic plasticity
and the diversity of polyploid plants. Science 320:
481–483.
2. Bretagnolle F, Thompson JD (1995) Gametes
with the somatic chromosome number: Mecha-
nisms of their formation and role in the evolution
of autopolyploid plants. New Phytologist 129:
1–22.
3. Simillion C, Vandepoele K, Van Montagu M,
Zabeau M, Van de Peer Y (2002) The hidden
duplication past of Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl
Acad Sci U S A 99: 13627–13632.
4. Mittelsten Scheid O, Afsar K, Paszkowski J (2003)
Formation of stable epialleles and their para-
mutation-like interaction in tetraploid Arabidopsis
thaliana. Nat Genet 34: 450–454.
5. Otto SP, Whitton J (2000) Polyploid incidence
and evolution. Annu Rev Genet 34: 401–437.
6. d’Erfurth I, Jolivet S, Froger N, Catrice O,
Novatchkova M, et al. (2008) Mutations in ATPS1
(Arabidopsis thaliana Parallel Spindle 1) lead to the
production of diploid pollen grains. PLoS Genet 4:
e1000274. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000274.
7. Harlan JR, deWet JMJ (1975) On O. Winge and
a Prayer: The origins of polyploidy. Bot Rev 41:
361–389.
8. Henry IM, Dilkes BP, Young K, Watson B,
Wu H, et al. (2005) Aneuploidy and genetic
variation in the Arabidopsis thaliana triploid re-
sponse. Genetics 170: 1979–1988.
9. Ramanna MS, Jacobsen E (2003) Relevance of
sexual polyploidization for crop improvement—A
review. Euphytica 133: 3–18.
10. Fukuda Y (1927) Cytological studies on the
development of pollen grains in different races
of solanum. Bot Mag Tokyo 41: 459–474.
11. Peloquin SJ, Boiteux LS, Carputo D (1999)
Meiotic mutants in potato. Valuable variants.
Genetics 153: 1493–1499.
12. Mercier R, Vezon D, Bullier E, Motamayor JC,
Sellier A, et al. (2001) SWITHC1 (SWI1): A novel
gene required for the establishment of sister
chromatid cohesion and bivalent formation at
meiosis. Genes Dev 15: 1859–1871.
13. Ravi M, Marimuthu MP, Siddiqi I (2008)
Gamete formation without meiosis in Arabidop-
sis. Nature 451(7182): 1121–1124.
14. Li J, Lee GI, Van Doren SR, Walker JC (2000)
The FHA domain mediates phosphoprotein
interactions. J Cell Sci 113: 4143–4149.
15. Pereira G, Schiebel E (2001) The role of the yeast
spindle pole body and the mammalian centro-
some in regulating late mitotic events. Curr Opin
Cell Biol 13: 762–769.
16. Job D, Valiron O, Oakley B (2003) Microtubule
nucleation. Curr Opin Cell Biol 15: 111–117.
17. Paradez A, Wright A, Ehrhardt DW (2006)
Microtubule cortical array organization and plant
cell morphogenesis. Curr Opin Plant Biol 9:
571–578.
18. Ehrhardt DW, Shaw SL (2006) Microtubule
dynamics and organization in the plant cortical
array. Ann Rev Plant Biol 57: 859–875.
Figure 1. Formation of parallel spindles during meiosis II in atps1 gives unreduced spores. In atps1 formation of meiosis II, spindles in a
plane parallel to that during meiosis I results in each half of the cell getting one of the two sister chromatids. Cytokinesis occurs only at the end of
meiosis II, and the planes of division overlap, resulting in a dyad of diploid spores.
doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000272.g001
PLoS Genetics | www.plosgenetics.org 2 November 2008 | Volume 4 | Issue 11 | e1000272


Spindle Positioning, Meiotic Nonreduction, and Polyploidy in Plants

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Publications of the IAS Fellows

Directory of Open Access Journals

Indian Academy of Sciences