Purpose: We investigate student corporate brand identification towards three corporate brands: a UK University, a leading UK business school and its overseas collaborative partner institute in Asia.
Methodology: A theory-building case study within the phenomenological/ qualitative research tradition
Findings: The strength of student identification to a corporate brand is predicated on awareness, knowledge and experience of a brand. The data revealed three types of corporate brand identification. This reflects different types of student relationships within the three institutions examined. We categorise these as follows: brand member (a contractual/legal relationship with a corporate brand); brand supporter (a trusting corporate brand relationship) and brand owner (an emotional ownership/relationship with the corporate brand). In explaining the above we view the above states in terms of a corporate brand identification management hierarchy which we categorise as legalisation, realisation and, finally, (brand) actualisation. Senior managers should strive for brand actualisation.
Research Limitations: The insights from a single, exploratory, case study might not be generalisable.
Practical Implications: We conceptualise that a bureaucratic/product management approach is more likely to result in low brand identification (legalisation); that a diplomatic/communications management approach is more likely to result in moderate brand identification (realisation) and finally, that a custodial/brand values and promise management approach is more likely to result in high brand identification (brand actualisation). These categorisations can have a utility in ascertaining the effectiveness of corporate brand management.
Originality/value of paper: Examines multiple student identification (towards a University, Business School and a non degree-awarding Overseas Institute)
