Disease control is only one facet of a successful management program. Treatment of disease is not as effective or as economical as prevention. Many outbreaks of disease in swine herds can be avoided by using management practices that include strict sanitation and immunization programs

Floss, Jeanette L.

Tubbs, Roderick C.

University of Missouri: MOspace

Swine Management AGRICULTURAL ,MU Guide PUBLISHED BY UNIVERSITY EXTENSION, UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA Herd Management for Disease Prevention Roderick C. Tubbs, DVM, MS Swine Veterinarian, Commercial Agriculture Program Jeanette L. Floss, DVM, MS College of Veterinary Medicine Disease control is only one facet of a successful management program. Treatment of disease is not as effective or as economical as prevention. Many out­breaks of disease in swine herds can be avoided by using management practices that include strict sanitation and immunization programs. Biosecurity Biosecurity is a herd management strategy designed to minimize the potential for introducing disease-causing organisms onto the farm or its build­ings. People, pigs or wildlife may transport diseases from outside the herd. Trucks that have visited other operations may also carry disease organisms. All equipment and tools should be cleaned thoroughly after each use. From a health standpoint, the herd should be located at least two miles from other pigs. If this is not possible, attention should be given to the location of the nearest swine herds, prevailing winds and the likelihood of accidental exposure to other pigs or wildlife. Domestic pets that have been exposed to other pigs are also a concern. A perimeter chain link fence will discourage peo­ple and stray animals from entering the grounds. Bird screens on all curtain-sided buildings reduce the potential for disease transmission by birds. Strict visitor policies should be enforced, with only necessary personnel allowed access to pig areas. Visitors may be required to shower and to change into clothes provided by the swine unit. Ideally, visi­tors should not have been present on other swine farms in the previous 24 hours. Feed delivery and animal load-out should take place at the perimeter areas so that transportation personnel do not enter the unit. Feed bins should be located adjacent to perimeter fencing. A load-out area should be available from the last finishing building near the perimeter fence, or pigs should be transport­ed to the road using farm equipment, so that livestock trucks do not enter the compound. All inlall out Pigs should be moved as a group during each stage of production in an all-in/ all-out manner. When a group is moved from any production facility, that area should be cleaned thoroughly by power washing and then disinfected. Disinfection should be attempt­ed only after thorough cleaning. Cold temperatures and organic material reduce the effectiveness of most disinfectants. The chemical agents commonly used require several minutes in contact with disease-pro­ducing agents to be effective. Disinfection procedures should include: 1. Removal of bedding, manure and feed. 2.	 Thorough cleaning with hot soapy water and/or 2 percent lye. 3.	 Rinsing with clear water to remove all residues. 4.	 Correct application of an approved disin­fectant (Table 1). 5.	 Adequate rest periods for the area before the introduction of new animals. Consult a veterinarian for the specific recommenda­tions applying to your situation. Newborn pigs, weanlings, feeders and breeding animals should be kept separate. Some diseases that may cause few or no clinical signs in one group may be highly pathogenic to another group. In general, the benefits of changing from continu­ous flow production to all in/all out production are: 1.	 7 to 10 percent improvement in average daily gain and feed efficiency. 2.14 to 28 day improvement in days to market. $.50	 G 2507 Printed with Soy Ink Table 1. Common disinfectants, their characteristics and uses. Active compound Uses Range of effectiveness Disadvantages Common brands and names Chlorhexidine equipment premises foot baths Some bacteria and viruses, ineffective against parvo-virus, Pseudomonas Reduced activity against certain organisms Nolvasan® Chlorine Hypochlorites Chloramines cleaned equipment Bacteria and fungi, limited effect on bacterial spores and viruses Inactivated by organic material, may be irritating Chloramine-T®, Chlorox®, Halazone® Cresols, Phenols equipment premises foot baths Variety of bacteria, limited effect on fungi and viruses, poor against bacterial spores Strong odor with coal or wood tar distillates Cresl-400®, Environ®, Laro®, Lysol® Formaldehyde other Aldehydes equipment premises foot baths Variety of bacteria, bacterial spores, fungi and viruses Irritating fumes Cidex®, DC&R®, Formaldegen®, Formalin lodophors cleaned equipment Bacteria and fungi, limited effect on bacterial spores and viruses Inactivated by organic material Betadine®, 10feC®, Isodyn®, Losan® Quaternary Ammonium compounds cleaned equipment Variety of bacteria, limited effect on bacterial spores, fungi and viruses Inactivated by organic material, neutralized by soaps Germex®, Zephiran®, Hi-Lethol® ·Source: Pork Industry Handbook publication by G. W Meyerholz and J. Gaskin, Extension Bulletin E-1596. 3.	 1 to 4 percent improvement in mortality during the grower to finish phase. 4. Fewer "tail-ender" pigs. Adding replacement animals All incoming breeding stock should be quaran­tined in isolation for 30 to 60 days at a minimum of 200 yards from the primary herd. Thirty days is the minimum period for adequate isolation and observa­tion. Longer periods offer even more security. More recommendations for handling and observing new additions are outlined in MU publication G2508, Herd Health Programs for Swine Seedstack Production. Routine health procedures Because of the prevalence and impact of specific diseases, a vaccination program should be followed. Caution and routine surveillance are the primary health procedures suggested. Pig management pro­cedures may be performed during the first three days of life. These include iron injections, tail dock­ing, removal of needle teeth, and ear notching for identification. Vaccination program. A combination Leptospir­osis/Parvovirus/Erysipelas vaccine should be given twice, at least two weeks apart, to all incoming breed­ing animals. It should also be given to all sows when the pigs are weaned and to boars twice a year. Pigs should receive Erysipelas vaccine at the time of wean­ing. The need for other vaccines should be deter­mined with the aid of a practicing veterinarian. Internal and external parasite control. All incom­ing replacements should receive two treatments, two weeks apart, with external and internal parasiticides. Fecal samples should be monitored from each pro­duction area on a quarterly basis to determine the presence of internal parasites. Further refinement of the deworming program is based on the results of these examinations (see MU publication G2430, Common Internal Parasites of Swine). Animals in all phases of production should be observed at regular intervals for clinical signs of external parasites. Hog lice (Haematopinus suis) feed on blood and cause irritation to the skin, which can lead to scratching, restlessness and reduced feed intake. The mange mites (Sarcoptes scabiei and Demodex phylloides) burrow in the skin or live in hair follicles, resulting in skin irritation that can occur with or without itching. Baby pigs are very susceptible to lice and mites, but are sensitive to the treatment compounds. Therefore, control measures should be directed at the sows. Skin scrapings should be conducted on at least six breeding animals every six months to moni­tor for external parasites. Consulting with your vet­erinarian to select the proper control measures for your operation will reduce the risk of infestation by Page 2	 G 2507 these parasites (see MU publication G7020, Controlling External Parasites of Swine). Slaughter checks. Slaughter checks should be conducted quarterly to examine for evidence of ascarid (worm) migration in the liver, pneumonia in the lungs, and atrophic rhinitis in the nasal turbinates. The skin, joints and intestinal and reproductive sys­tems can also be observed during the slaughter checks. The findings of these checks can be used to refine health management procedures. Monitoring. Blood samples should be obtained annually from breeding animals and examined for antibody titers for Pseudorabies and Brucellosis. Serologic tests should also be done for diseases that are common within the area in which the herd is located. Feed samples should be checked at least every six months for proper mixing, particle size and the presence of the major nutrients in the amounts cal­culated in the ration formulations. Samples may be held back and saved from each major shipment of grain for mycotoxin testing in the event that disease signs suggest possible exposure. Monitoring for other infectious agents may be done at regular intervals. These include serology for TGE, nasal swabs and cultures for Pasteurella and Bordetalla bronchiseptica. Feed additives. Feed-additive, growth-promotant antibiotics may be used in the early phases of growth. It may be advantageous to run "on-farm" trials in the finishing phase to determine the economic return on using antibiotics during this time. In general, the return is much smaller as the pigs increase in size. Each feed additive should be evaluated for its effect on growth and disease organisms to determine which will be the most cost-effective for a given operation. This publication does not introduce any new con­cepts, but is designed to reemphasize the importance of strict management practices that minimize the exposure of susceptible animals, breeding or finish­ing, to potential diseases. G 2507 Page 3 • Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension Work Acts of May 8 and June 30,1914~)l University in cooperation with the United States Department of Agriculture. Ronald C. Powers,~Extension Interim Director, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Missouri and Lincoln UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI University, Columbia, Missouri 65211 .• An equal opportunity institution. COLUMBIA Page 4 G 2507 Revised 6/93/7M 

Herd management for disease prevention (1993)

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

University of Missouri: MOspace