The objective of this publication is to identify the differences and similarities between managing municipal wastewater and managing the manure from grow-finish pig systems.New 2/07/1

Fulhage, Charles Duane

Lory, John A. (John Albert)

Zulovich, Joseph M., (Joseph Michael)

University of Missouri: MOspace

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITYPUBLISHED BY MU EXTENSION, UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA extension.missouri.edu$. 50 EQ 349  Printed on recycled paperThe objective of this publication is to identify the differences and similarities between managing munic-ipal wastewater and managing the manure from grow-finish pig systems.There are two defining differences between domes-tic wastewater treatment and animal manure systems:1. Domestic wastewater systems discharge large volumes of treated water directly to surface waters of the state, whereas it is illegal to dis-charge manure from storage facilities or in run-off from agricultural fields into surface waters of the state. 2. Manure is a valued fertilizer on many hog oper-ations, whereas human excreta are a component of a waste stream that is a net cost for home-owners, towns and municipalities.Volume of human wastewater versus grow-finish manureDomestic wastewater systems handle high-­volume waste streams with relatively low concentrations of nutrients and other components of the waste (Figure 1). Every toilet, shower, washing machine and dish-washer contributes significant amounts of water to the waste stream. Plus, many sewage treatment plants handle water from industry and any stormwater that enters the system. The variability of industrial contri-butions and storm water makes per capita wastewater generation quite variable. As an example of the vol-umes involved, the city of Columbia, Missouri (popu-lation 92,000) handles 16 million gallons of wastewa-ter each day, or about 175 gallons per person per day. The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District (population 1,400,000) handles 360 million gallons of wastewater each day, or about 255 gallons per person per day. In contrast, manure production on hog finishing operations is predominantly feces and urine generated by the animals. Added water in the buildings is limited to cleaning activities and wasted drinking water. Total manure and wastewater production averages about 1.4 gallons per animal per day for grow-­finish opera-tions. Volumes are higher on operations that have open manure storages in regions where annual rain-fall exceeds annual evaporation. On these operations, manure and wastewater production still typically runs less than 3 gallons per animal per day.Cross-species comparisons are typically based on a standard live-­weight basis. Daily wastewater produc-tion for 1,000 lb of humans (assuming 150 lb per person average weight and 175 gallons per person per day) is 1,170 gallons/day compared with 9.3 gallons/day for 1,000 lb of grow-­finish pigs (average weight 150 lb per pig), a ratio of 125:1. To put the differences in volume in perspective, all the grow-­finish pigs in Missouri generate less manure volume than the City of Columbia. It would take 5.3 million to 11.4 million grow-­finish pigs to produce the same volume of manure and wastewater as the volume of wastewater the city of Columbia treats in a day. Pig inventory in Missouri has hovered near 3 million head in the years 2000 to 2003.MU GuideManure ManagementHog Manure and Domestic  Wastewater Management ObjectivesJohn A. Lory, Division of Plant Sciences and Commercial Agriculture ProgramJoe Zulovich, Agricultural Engineering Extension and Commercial Agriculture ProgramCharles Fulhage, Agricultural Engineering ExtensionFigure 1. Settling basins at a wastewater treatment facility.Fate of human wastewater  versus grow-finish manureThe high volume of wastewater forces most domes-tic systems to discharge treated wastewater directly to streams and other surface waters of the state. It is infea-sible to construct sufficient storage and have sufficient land base to apply all domestic wastewater to the land as a nutrient or a source of irrigation water. Domes-tic wastewater is processed to reduce the potential impact of discharging wastewater directly into receiv-ing streams and surface waters. The treatment process includes steps to reduce solids in the water, reduce nutrient concentration and sometimes other treatment processes to minimize the impact on receiving waters. The solids removed from domestic wastewater before discharge typically are land applied as a fertilizer (bio-solids) to agricultural land. The regulatory permit for wastewater treatment plants stipulates the quality of the water that is released by the plant into surface waters and the management practices used to land apply biosolids.The limited added water in swine manure sys-tems makes it feasible to contain the manure in storage structures and then land apply the manure as a fertil-izer source. Permits on almost all animal feeding oper-ations make routine discharge of manure to waters of the state illegal; the permits are called “no-discharge” permits. All manure must be land applied in a manner that prevents overflow of manure storages and run-off during manure application. The rates of manure applied to fields also are dictated by the productivity of crops. Failure to comply with these standards typi-cally results in a notice of violation and fines from reg-ulatory agencies.Fate of solidsIn both systems, most of the solids and nutrients are land applied to agricultural fields (Figure 2). In domestic wastewater systems, the solids are removed from the wastewater that is discharged into surface water. The solids are then digested to reduce the vol-ume of solids and to reduce human pathogens. This material, called biosolids, is typically land applied to agricultural fields. In animal manure systems like anaerobic lagoons, solids are also digested before land application. In other liquid systems such as pit slurry manure, there is little digestion of the solids in the manure storage. Instead manure solids are digested by the microor-ganisms in the soil. Some composting takes place in manure collected in high-rise and other bedding-type manure management systems.Biochemical oxygen demandBiochemical oxygen demand (BOD) is a measure of the amount of oxygen required to degrade organic matter in water. One major objective of domestic waste-­water treatment is to reduce BOD in wastewater before discharging it into surface waters. Releasing waste-­water with high BOD can lead to low oxygen (anoxic) conditions in the receiving waters as organisms in the water break down the excess organic matter. Anoxic conditions can lead to fish kills and other negative effects on receiving waters.The Columbia Missouri water treatment plant typ-ically receives waste with a BOD of 300 parts per mil-lion (ppm). Waste treatment in the plant reduces BOD to 60 ppm. Columbia then further “polishes” the water through artificial wetlands so that water released to the Missouri River has less than 10 ppm BOD. This last step is not typical of most waste treatment facilities.The ultimate fate of animal manure is land applica-tion so the BOD of the manure is not a relevant indica-tor of environmental impact and typically is not mea-sured. The BOD of hog manure is typically at least 100 times higher than untreated domestic wastewater. This is expected because the manure has not been diluted by high volumes of wastewater typical in domestic waste streams. Anaerobic lagoons reduce the BOD of manure, but other manure handling systems do not attempt to reduce BOD of the manure in storage. The organic matter in manure enhances biological activity and soil structure in soils receiving manure.PathogensTreatment of human waste is designed to reduce pathogens to meet permit requirements and water quality standards. Missouri water quality standards limit fecal coliform levels, an indicator for patho-gens, to 200 colonies per 100 milliliters in wastewater released to recreational waters. Land-­applied biosolids are also processed to reduce pathogen levels.Manure has no regulatory requirement for treat-ment and no specific pathogen limits before land appli-cation. Treatment for pathogens in manure includes digestion in some manure storage systems, exposure to sun, and degradation in the soil. EQ 349 Page   University of Missouri ExtensionFigure 2. Injecting manure as a fertilizer for crop production.The value of manureFertilizer value is dictated in part by its nutrient concentration. Materials with a higher nutrient con-centration cost less to transport and reduce the time to deliver recommended rates of nutrients to a field. Most commercial fertilizer sources exceed 30 percent composition of fertilizer nutrients. Examples include anhydrous ammonia (82%), ammonium nitrate (34%), diammonium phosphate (64%) and potassium chlo-ride (63%). Manure sources have much lower nutrient concentrations than most commercial fertilizer sources; manure sources typically contain less than 5 percent fertilizer nutrients and in some cases the percentage is much lower. Recent increases in fertilizer prices have increased the value of manure.Animal manure has been recognized through his-tory as a valuable fertilizer source and it is no differ-ent in many modern manure management systems. In a slurry operation, manure is a key component of the operation’s financial success. The MU Extension publication G9334 Optimizing Fertilizer Value of Manure from Slurry Hog Finishing Operations provides detailed information on the fertilizer value of slurry manure. A 2004 research paper found that manure value on slurry operations had the potential to be 16 percent of the net income of the operation. Financial success of operations that use anaerobic lagoons is less dependent on extracting manure value from their manure. However, injected lagoon effluent provides nitrogen in a form that is highly available to plants and more predictable than other manure types. A high percentage of the phosphorus and significant amounts of nitrogen and potassium accumulate in the bottom of lagoons. University of Missouri research is focused on determining strategies to cover the cost of removing solids from the bottom of lagoons with the fertilizer value of the material. This sludge material can have high concentrations of fertilizer nutrients, making it a potentially valuable fertilizer source. ConclusionsDirect comparison of human wastewater produc-tion and animal manure production is misleading and typically unproductive. Human waste systems are characterized by high volumes of diluted material that is treated to minimize the impact of the direct release of wastewater into sur-face waters of the state. In contrast, it is illegal to discharge animal manure into waters of the state; instead manure is land applied as a fertilizer for crop production. Hog manure typically has little added wastewater, resulting in a product that has substantially higher concentrations of nutrients and organic matter than human wastewater. These higher concentrations make it feasible to use the manure as a fertilizer source for crop production.EQ 349 Page 3  University of Missouri Extension■ Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension Work Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the United States Department of Agriculture. Michael D. Ouart, Director, Cooperative Extension, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211. ■ University of Missouri Extension does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, religion, age, disability or status as a Vietnam era veteran in employment or programs. ■ If you have special needs as addressed by the Americans with Disabilities Act and need this publication in an alternative format, write ADA Officer, Extension and Agricultural Information, 1-98 Agriculture Building, Columbia, MO 65211, or call 573-882-7216. Reasonable efforts will be made to accommodate your special needs.EQ 349  Page 4 New /07/1MFor further informationCity of Columbia, Columbia Missouri Waste Treatment Plant. Web page checked /3/007.  http://gocolumbiamo.com/PublicWorks/Sewer/wwtppg_4.php. Lory J.A., R.E. Massey, J.M. Zulovich, J.A. Hoehne, A.M. Schmidt, M.S. Shannon and C.D. Fulhage. 004. An Assessment of Nitrogen-Based Manure Application Rates on 39 US Swine Operations. J. Environ. Qual. 33:1106-1113.Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District. Web page checked /3/007.  http://msd.st-louis.mo.us/PublicComm/Welcome. Midwest Plan Service. 004. Manure Characteristics. MWPS-18 nd edition. Iowa State University, Ames Iowa.National Livestock and Poultry Environmental Learning Center. Pathogen Resources. Web page checked /3/007. http://lpe.unl.edu/pathogen.html.From University of Missouri Extension Publications 1-800-292-0969G9334 Optimizing Fertilizer Value of Manure from Slurry Hog Finishing OperationsG918 Managing Manure Phosphorus to Protect Water QualityG90 Strategies to Minimize Phosphorus Loss From Your FarmG918 Managing Nitrogen to Protect Water QualityG919 Setback Distances for Land Application of ManureG9183 Phosphorus Best Management Practices for Biosolids and Other Organic ResidualsWQ46 Best Management Practices for Biosolids Land ApplicationWQ41 State and EPA Regulations for Domestic Wastewater Sludge and Biosolids

Hog Manure and Domestic Wastewater Management Objectives (2007)

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

University of Missouri: MOspace