research

Kaley v. United States: The Right to Counsel of Choice Caught in the Wide Net of Asset Forfeiture

Abstract

This commentary previews an upcoming Supreme Court case, Kaley v. United States, in which the Court may decide whether a defendant who needs potentially forfeitable assets to retain counsel of choice is entitled, under the Due Process Clause, to a hearing to challenge the grand jury\u27s finding of probable cause

    Similar works