In Cunningham v. California, the United States Supreme Court voted 6-3 to invalidate California\u27s determinate sentencing law ( DSL ) as violative of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. The Court held that, notwithstanding the California Supreme Court\u27s determination to the contrary, the DSL conflicted with prior Supreme Court precedent by placing sentence-elevating factfinding within the judge\u27s province, thereby violat[ing] a defendant\u27s right to trial by jury safeguarded by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments
