Examines the views of D. Bloesch, G. Fackre, and C. Pinnock. Indicates their disjunctive positions introduce ontological and epistemological dualism into the doctrine of revelation. Takes Packer\u27s view of the Bible as the Word of God written, affirming that the human languages used to reflect God\u27s person and work are competent to do so. Finds Wolterstorff\u27s answer to Barth and John Baillie insightful, but we must move past his views to the full-orbed acceptance of the Word of God as written to avoid negating propositional revelation
