Fil: Ivanov, Verónica. Centro de Estudios en Parasitología y Vectores (CEPAVE). Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo. Universidad Nacional de La Plata; ArgentinaFil: Campbell, Ronald A.. Department of Biology. University of Massachusetts Dartmouth. Massachusetts; US

Campbell, Ronald A.

Ivanov, Verónica

LAReferencia - Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas Latinoamericanas

Echinobothrium-Megacanthum Sp. N. (Cestoda, Diphyllidea) from the Eagle Rap Myliobatis-Goodei (Chondrichthyes, Rajoidei) from the Patagonian Shelf of Argentina

Naturalis

225 Echinobothrium megacanthum sp. n. (Cestoda: Diphyllidea) from the eagle ray Myliobatis goodei (Chondrichthyes: Rajoidei) from the Patagonian shelf of Argentina Verónica A. Ivanov1 and Ronald A. Campbell2 1Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores (CEPAVE), Calle 2 No. 584, 1900 La Plata, Argentina; 2Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, N. Dartmouth, Massachusetts 02747-2300, USA Key words: Diphyllidea, Echinobothrium, taxonomy, Myliobatis goodei, Argentina Abstract. A new species of Echinobothrium is described from the spiral intestine of the eagle ray Myliobatis goodei Garman, 1885 from the San Matías Gulf, Argentina. Echinobothrium megacanthum sp. n. is distinguished from all others by the following combination of characters: 27 large hooks per apical group, a continuous row of 12 hooklets on each lateral surface of the rostellum, 38-43 spines per row on the cephalic peduncle and 13-15 testes per segment. The new species is most similar to E. euzeti Campbell et Carvajal, 1980, E. mathiasi Euzet, 1951 and E. raschii Campbell et Andrade, 1997. Echinobothrium megacanthum can be differentiated from E. euzeti by the number of spines per row on the cephalic peduncle (100-107 in E. euzeti), number of lateral hooklets (6-7), and number of testes (37-42). It can be distinguished from E. mathiasi by the number of lateral hooklets (4 in E. mathiasi), number of spines per row on the cephalic peduncle (50-60), number of testes (25-30), and from E. raschii by the number of lateral hooklets (27-36 in E. raschii), number of spines per row on the cephalic peduncle (21-26), and number of testes (17-23). Differences in the scolex armature clearly distinguish E. megacanthum from E. pigmentatum Ostrowski de Núñez, 1971, E. acanthocolle Wojciechowska, 1991 and E. notoguidoi Ivanov, 1997, the only species described previously from hosts in the southwestern Atlantic. Echinobothrium pigmentatum differs in possessing 20 large apical hooks, a continuous row of 21-22 lateral hooklets and 9-13 spines on the cephalic peduncle. The scolex armature of E. acanthocolle lacks lateral hooklets, and possesses only 5 spines per row on the cephalic peduncle. Echinobothrium notoguidoi differs in the possession of a wide corona of spines posterior to the rostellum, number of spines per row on the cephalic peduncle (24-26), number of hooklets disposed in lateral groups (13 per group), and number of large apical hooks (31). The genus Echinobothrium van Beneden, 1849 is the most species-rich genus of diphyllidean cestodes. Two species of Echinobothrium, E. pigmentatum Ostrowski de Núñez, 1971 from the rhinobatid Zapteryx brevirostris and E. notoguidoi Ivanov, 1997 from the triakid shark Mustelus schmitti, have been reported in previous studies of the helminth fauna of elasmobranchs from Mar del Plata on the north coast of Argentina. A third species, E. acanthocolle Wojciechowska, 1991 from the skate Raja georgiana has been described from South Georgia Island to the South of Argentina. Another new species of Echinobothrium, described herein, was recently discovered in the spiral intestine of a myliobatid ray, Myliobatis goodei taken during an ichthyological survey of fishes from the Patagonian shelf off southern Argentina. MATERIALS AND METHODS Three specimens of Myliobatis goodei captured in trawls during ichthyological surveys of the San Matías Gulf on the Patagonian coast of Argentina were identified and dissected by  Dr. Edgardo  Di  Giácomo  from  the  Instituto de Biología Marina y Pesquera “Almirante Storni” San Antonio Oeste, Argentina. Worms were fixed in situ by injecting the spiral intestine with 10% formalin. After 48 hrs the preserved spiral valves were transferred to 70% ethanol for storage. Whole mounts of worms were stained with Harris’ hematoxylin, dehydrated in ethanol, cleared in methyl salicylate and mounted in Canada balsam. The numbers of rostellar hooks were determined from permanent whole mounts and from specimens temporarily mounted in glycerine. Details of internal anatomy were determined from transverse serial sections of a specimen embedded in paraffin, cut 8 µm thick, stained with Harris’ hematoxylin, and counterstained with eosin. Two specimens were prepared for scanning electron microscopy as follows: they were fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide, dried in Peldri II (Ted Pella Inc., Redding, California), mounted on stubs with adhesive tape, coated with conductive silver paint, sputter coated with gold in a Hummer VI-A sputter coater, and examined in a JSM 820 (Jeol) scanning electron microscope. Measurements are preceded by the sample size (n) and include the range followed in parentheses by the mean and standard deviation. All measurements are in micrometres unless otherwise stated. Figures were drawn with the aid of a drawing tube on a Nikon Optiphot-2 microscope. Type specimens have been deposited in the Museo de Ciencias Naturales de La Plata, Departamento FOLIA PARASITOLOGICA 45: 225-229, 1998 Address for correspondence: V.A. Ivanov, Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, N. Dartmouth, Massachusetts 02747-2300, USA. Phone: ++1 508 999 8216; Fax: ++1 508 999 8196; E-mail: rcampbell@umassd.edu 226                                       Figs. 1-7. Echinobothrium megacanthum sp. n. Fig. 1. Scolex. Fig. 2. Large apical hooks. Fig. 3. Detail of hooklets from lateral view of scolex. Fig. 4. Spines on the cephalic peduncle. Fig. 5. Mature segment, ventral view. Fig. 6. Detail of terminal genitalia (holotype), lateral view, note partially everted cirrus. Fig. 7. Detail of cirrus spines.  Abbreviations: esv = external seminal vesicle, isv = internal seminal vesicle, u = uterus, v = vagina.   de Zoología Invertebrados (Parasitología) (MLP), Argentina, Institute of Parasitology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (IPCAS), České Budějovice, and the United States National Parasite Collection (USNPC) in Beltsville, Maryland, USA. RESULTS Echinobothrium megacanthum sp. n.           Figs. 1-14 T y p e  h o s t : Myliobatis goodei Garman, 1885 (Chon-drichthyes: Myliobatidae). T y p e  l o c a l i t y : San Antonio Oeste (40°44’S, 64°56’W), San Matías Gulf, Argentina. S i t e  o f   i n f e c t i o n : spiral intestine. H o l o t y p e : MLP No. 3958. P a r a t y p e s : IPCAS No.C-288, USNPC No. 87474 Description (based on 6 complete specimens and 7 fragmented specimens with scolices): Strobila 4.45-6.64 (5.84 ± 0.9; n = 6) mm long, maximum width 205-288 (243 ± 31.4), acraspedote, apolytic, composed of 9-12 (11 ± 1; n = 6) segments; 1-2 (2 ± 1) segments mature, terminal segment gravid. Scolex 1.14-1.31 (1.23 ± 0.06; n = 12) mm long, consisting of armed apical rostellum, 2 oval bothridia and armed cephalic peduncle. Rostellum 160-176 (168 ± 8; n = 12) long by 144-208 (160 ± 27.7) wide. Rostellar armature consisting of one dorsal and one ventral group of 27 large apical hooks flanked by a continuous row of lateral hooklets. Each group of 27 large hooks arranged in 2 rows; 14 hooks Ivanov and Campbell: Echinobothrium megacanthum sp. n. 227                                                  Figs. 8-14. Scanning electron micrographs of Echinobothrium megacanthum sp. n. Fig. 8. Scolex. Fig. 9. Edge of bothridium showing transition from filiform microtriches on distal surface (right) to palmate microtriches on proximal surface (left). Fig. 10. Filiform microtriches on distal surface of bothridia. Fig. 11. Meshlike branching filaments on anterior median region of bothridium, distal surface. Fig. 12. Bothridia showing views of proximal and distal surfaces. Fig. 13. Cephalic peduncle surface showing rows of spines. Fig. 14. Palmate microtriches on proximal surface of bothridium. Scale bars 100 µm (Fig. 8), 10 µm (Figs. 9, 12, 13) and 1 µm (Figs. 10, 11, 14). 228 in anterior row, 13 in posterior row, largest hooks at middle of rows. Hook lengths: anterior row 31.5-34.6 (32.9 ± 1; n = 84) to 115.2-124.8 (120.5 ± 3.5) long; posterior row 23.7-28.8 (26.7 ± 1.5; n = 78) to 123.8-131.2 (127.1 ± 3) long. A total of 12 lateral hooklets, 18.6-27.5 (22.7 ± 2.8; n = 48) long, forms a continuous row across each lateral surface of rostellum joining groups of large hooks; hooklets decreasing in size toward centre of row, space between sixth and seventh hooklets slightly larger than separation between other hooklets. Two bothridia, 288.0-329.6 (297.2 ± 16.3; n = 20) long by 227.0-281.6 (258.1 ± 22.8) wide, linguiform and tapering to a point posteriorly, marginal indentation lacking, disposed on dorsal and ventral surfaces, overlapping cephalic peduncle. Distal (adherent) bothridial surface covered with filiform microtriches, (approximately 2 long); branching rhizoid-like filaments occupy central region of bothridia immediately proximal to large apical hooks. Proximal bothridial surface covered with palmate microtriches, 3.0-3.5 long by 1.2-1.4 maximum width, each bearing a single row of 5-7 slender processes on the free margin; central process 1.0-1.2 long, lateral processes shorter, 0.5-0.8 long. Cephalic peduncle 780-1027 (948 ± 90.3; n = 13) long, maximum width 115.2-144.0 (127.2 ± 9.6) near junction of bothridia, armed with 8 longitudinal rows of 38-43 (40 ± 2) spines each. Spines with slender spiniform blade, bearing 1 ventral and 2 lateral prongs, decreasing in size posteriorly. Largest spines anterior, blade 92.2-99.2 (95.4 ± 2.2; n = 30) long, base width 51.2-68.2 (61.7 ± 5.3), ventral prong 22.4-27.2 (24.7 ± 1.5) long. Posterior spines of each row smaller, blade 14.6-16.6 (15.7 ± 0.7; n= 20) long, base width 12.8-15.4 (14.0 ± 0.9), ventral prong 7.0-10.2 (8.9 ± 1) long. Cephalic peduncle longer than bothridia, ratio of bothridial length to cephalic peduncle length 1 : 2.7-1: 3.6 (1 : 3.2). Mature segments 929.5-1200 (1090 ± 112.1; n = 5) long by 205.0-253.5 (231.6 ± 16.3) wide; gravid segment 1.59-1.60 (n = 2) mm long by 202-288 wide. Genital pore midventral, 60-67 (62; n = 6) % of segment length from anterior margin. Genital atrium 75-80 (78 ± 2.4; n = 6) in diameter. Cirrus sac 134.5-292.0 (215.1 ± 55.6; n = 16) long by 73.6-144.0 (108.0 ± 17.7) wide, elongated, postequatorial, antero-medial to genital pore. Cirrus sparsely armed with large uncinate and falcate spines, 23.4-27.3 (25.6 ± 1.4; n = 10) long, base length 11.2-24 (16.9 ± 3.6). Internal and external seminal vesicles present; internal vesicle 132-138 (135 ± 2.2; n = 6) long and 51.3-54.2 (52.6 ± 1.1) wide; external vesicle 133-137.5 (135.1 ± 1.7; n = 6) long and 54.5-56.4 (55.7 ± 0.7). Testes subspherical, 41.6-51.2 (44.9 ± 3.2; n = 20) long by 51.3-60.8 (54.7 ± 3.3) wide, in median field, arranged in two irregular longitudinal rows extending from anterior margin of cirrus sac to anterior segment margin, 13-15 (14 ± 1; n = 10) per segment. Vagina entering genital atrium posterior to cirrus sac, descending in midline between ovarian lobes, then crossing ovarian isthmus to join ootype. Ovary in posterior 33% of segment, H-shaped, bilobed in cross section. Ovarian lobes approximately equal, 136-227 (178.1 ± 31.9; n = 10) long by 40-51 (45.2 ± 3.4) wide. Mehlis’ gland posterior to ovary, 56-136 (82.4 ± 26.7; n = 6) in diameter. Uterus linear, ascending dorsal to cirrus sac, terminating slightly anterior to cirrus sac in early gravid segments, uterus development in fully gravid segments not observed. Vitelline follicles subspherical, 16-29 (21 ± 4.4; n = 12) long by 16-36 (25 ± 6.4) wide, forming 2 bands lateral to testes (2 follicles deep in each), extending almost entire length of segment, arching medially in postovarian space. Eggs oval, 17.3-19.2 (18.4 ± 0.8; n = 4) by 8-11.3 (10.1 ± 1.2), filaments not observed. E t y m o l o g y : the specific epithet is from the Greek, mega - very large - acantha - spine, for the large spines of the cirrus armature. DISCUSSION Campbell and Andrade (1997) summarized the characters of a total of 19 clearly recognizable species in the genus Echinobothrium, and gave reasons for considering 8 species as species inquirendae (i.e., E. benedeni Ruszkowski, 1927, E. boisii Southwell, 1911, E. deeghai Gupta et Parmar, 1988, E. laevicolle Lespes, 1857, E. lateroporum Subhapradha, 1948, E. reesae Ramadevi, 1969, E. rhinoptera Shipley et Hornell, 1906 and E. scoliodoni Sanaka, Lakshmi et Rao, 1986). The latter species are based on inadequate descriptions in which there is uncertainty about characters that are diagnostic in the separation of species, i.e., the number of large apical hooks, lateral hooklets and spines per row in the cephalic peduncle. More recently, Ivanov (1997) added another species, E. notoguidoi, bringing the total number of recognizable species to 20.  Echinobothrium megacanthum can be distinguished from all other species in this genus by its possession of the following combination of characters: 27 large hooks per apical group, a continuous row of 12 hooklets on each lateral surface of the rostellum, 38-43 spines per row on the cephalic peduncle, 13-15 testes per segment, possession of external and internal seminal vesicles and a cirrus armature with large spines. Of the 20 recognizable species in the genus, E. megacanthum  is most similar to E. euzeti Campbell et Carvajal, 1980, E. mathiasi Euzet, 1951 and E. raschii Campbell et Andrade, 1997. Echinobothrium megacanthum resembles E. euzeti in possessing a similar number of large apical hooks per group in the rostellum (27 vs. 25 in E. euzeti), but differs in having fewer spines per row on the cephalic peduncle (38-43 vs. 100-107), more Ivanov and Campbell: Echinobothrium megacanthum sp. n. 229 lateral hooklets (12 vs. 6-7) and fewer number of testes (13-15 vs. 37-42). Echinobothrium megacanthum is like E. mathiasi in the number of large apical hooks per group (27 vs. 26), and the presence of external and internal seminal vesicles, but the two species are easily differentiated by the number of lateral hooklets (12 vs. 4 in E. mathiasi), number of spines per row on the cephalic peduncle (38-43 vs. 50-60) and number of testes (13-15 vs. 25-30). The number of large apical hooks of E. megacanthum is near that of E. raschii (27 vs. 23-25), but E. megacanthum differs in the number of lateral hooklets (12 vs. 27-36 in E. raschii), number of spines per row on the cephalic peduncle (38-43 vs. 21-26) and in the number of testes (13-15 vs. 17-23).  Three species of Echinobothrium previously described in the southwestern Atlantic are E. pig-mentatum, E. acanthocolle and E. notoguidoi. Echinobothrium megacanthum can be distinguished from E. pigmentatum by the number of large apical hooks (27 vs. 20 in E. pigmentatum), number of lateral hooklets (12 vs. 20-22), spines per row on the cephalic peduncle (38-43 vs. 9-13), and number of testes per segment (13-15 vs. 5-7). These characters also separate E. megacanthum from E. acanthocolle in which E. megacanthum possesses more large apical hooks (27 vs. 24 in E. acanthocolle), more lateral hooklets (12 vs. 0), more spines per row on the cephalic peduncle (38-43 vs. 5), and fewer testes per segment (13-15 vs. 23-25). Finally, E. megacanthum differs from E. notoguidoi in having fewer large apical hooks (27 vs. 31 in E. notoguidoi), fewer lateral hooklets (a continuous row of 12 vs. 2 lateral groups of 13), absence of a corona of spines posterior to the rostellum in E. megacanthum, and fewer spines per row on the cephalic peduncle (38-43 vs. 24-26). One of the most conspicuous and interesting features of this new species is the presence of relatively few but very large spines on the cirrus (23-27 µm). Most of the species within the genus Echinobothrium have a long cirrus densely covered with small spines. Since this character is unique in E. megacanthum, and can only be compared with E. mathiasi (cirrus spines up to 20 µm long), it appears that cirrus armature may be a useful character in the separation of species within this genus. Likewise, the kinds of microtriches and their distribution could be used in differentiation of species if they were known for all species since palmate microtriches are present on the distal bothridial surface and not restricted to the proximal surface as in E. megacanthum. Of all the species described in the genus, E. megacanthum appears to be closely related to E. mathiasi. Both species share many characters in the terminal genitalia and scolex morphology. Specifically these species possess external and internal seminal vesicles, large spines on the cirrus, similar number of large apical hooks, and long cephalic peduncle. Furthermore, E. mathiasi from the bullray Myliobatis aquila (syn. Leiobatis aquila) and E. megacanthum from M. goodei are the only representatives of the genus reported from rays of the family Myliobatidae. The similar characteristics of these 2 cestode species may be the result of host-parasite coevolution, as was noted by Ivanov (1997) for E. musteli Pintner, 1889, E. scoliodoni and E. notoguidoi in shark hosts. Acknowledgments. We gratefully acknowledge Dr. Edgardo Di Giácomo, Instituto de Biología Marina y Pesquera “Almirante Storni”, San Antonio Oeste, Argentina, for his help in collecting the samples. We also thank Stacy Mc Bride, University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth, for her assistance with SEM. REFERENCESCAMPBELL R.A., ANDRADE M. 1997: Echinobothrium raschii n. sp. (Cestoda: Diphyllidea) from Rhinoraja longi (Chondrichthyes: Rajoidei) in the Bering Sea. J. Parasitol. 83: 115-120.  CAMPBELL R.A., CARVAJAL, J. 1980: Echinobothrium euzeti, a new cestode from the spiral valve of a Chilean elasmobranch. Proc. Helminthol. Soc. Wash. 47: 165-167.  EUZET L. 1951: Echinobothrium mathiasi n. sp. (Cestoda, Diphyllidea) parasite d’une raie: Leiobatis aquila L. Bull. Soc. Zool. Fr. 76: 182-187. IVANOV  V.  A.   1997:   Echinobothrium  notoguidoi  n.  sp.  (Cestoda: Diphyllidea) from Mustelus schmitti (Chondrichthyes: Carcharhiniformes) in the Argentine Sea. J. Parasitol. 83: 913-916. OSTROWSKI DE NÚÑEZ M. 1971: Estudios preliminares sobre la fauna parasitaria de algunos elasmobranquios del litoral bonaerense, Mar del Plata, Argentina. I. Cestodes y trematodes de Psammobatis microps (Günther) y Zapteryx brevirostris (Müller y Henle). Physis 30: 425-446. WOJCIECHOWSKA A. 1991: Some tetraphyllidean and diphyllidean cestodes from Antarctic batoid fishes. Acta Parasitol. Pol. 36: 69-74. Received  10  April  1997   Accepted  17  October  1997 

Echinobothrium-Megacanthum Sp. N. (Cestoda, Diphyllidea) from the Eagle Rap Myliobatis-Goodei (Chondrichthyes, Rajoidei) from the Patagonian Shelf of Argentina

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

LAReferencia - Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas Latinoamericanas

Naturalis