Human activities have dramatically increased nitrogen (N) inputs to the landscape. Consequently, delivery of N to coastal waters, largely as nitrate (NO3-N), has increased, resulting in widespread eutrophication and harmful hypoxic conditions. The ability to mitigate the downstream effects of elevated N inputs requires a clear understanding of the transport and transformation of N in stream ecosystems. Here, I examine N processing in urban and forested watersheds of the Maryland Piedmont.
I provide extensive evidence that three high-N streams draining urban and forested watersheds of the Maryland Piedmont are unable to remove NO3-N as a result of both N saturation and phosphorus limitation. My findings illustrate that when elevated NO3-N concentrations occur in the absence of other stressors that stimulate autotrophic activity (e.g. reduced canopy cover, increased nutrients) uptake cannot compensate for increased N loads. A review of the literature indicates that systems that are similarly unable to remove NO3-N vary widely in terms of land use and background N concentrations, highlighting the limitations of our understanding of N saturation in stream ecosystems.
I also provide the first documentation of N saturation in both the aquatic and terrestrial components of an un-manipulated forested watershed. Detailed examination of N dynamics within the forested watershed reveals that the forest is severely N-saturated despite receiving atmospheric N inputs that are small relative to other parts of the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic. Because groundwater delivers a disproportionate fraction of the N load to the channel, in-stream N concentrations are elevated when deep groundwater flowpaths dominate, and the watershed is a source of N during dry periods, I hypothesize that hydrogeologic factors that control groundwater susceptibility to NO3-N contamination and promote delivery of NO3-N via subsurface flowpaths may exacerbate N-saturation response.
My results suggest that we cannot rely on in-stream processing to reduce N loads even in minimally impacted watersheds. As a result, it is critical that management efforts reduce N loading to streams and take advantage of opportunities for increasing N removal in impaired systems only after other options have been exhausted
