De Sutter, Gert

Willems, Annelore

English

Ghent University Academic Bibliography

 Grammatical complexity versus discourse status as determinants of PP placement in original and translated Dutch   Annelore Willems & Gert De Sutter Faculty of Translation Studies University College Ghent – Ghent University  {annelore.willems,gert.desutter}@hogent.be  The present corpus-based study discusses a well-known type of syntactic variation in Dutch, viz. prepositional phrase (PP) placement. Language users can put PPs either before V-final (A) or after V-final (B). (A) Niemand weet   dat   ik   van mannen  |hou|V-final.. No one    knows that  I    with men        am in love.  (B) Niemand weet   dat   ik  |hou|V-final     van mannen. No one    knows that  I    ’m in love       with men. In this study we investigate which variables determine this variation, and how these variables relate to each other. Furthermore, we will investigate whether these factors have an identical effect in translated vs. non-translated texts, as previous research has shown that translated texts differ in a systematic manner from non-translated texts (Olohan & Baker 2000). In order to do so, we extracted all PPs from the Dutch Parallel Corpus (DPC), which is a 10-million-word,  parallel corpus of Dutch, English and French (Macken et al. 2011). It contains six different text types, but for the present study we opted to look only at PP variation in journalistic texts. After manually checking the relevance of the extracted corpus data, we obtained a dataset containing 1251 clauses with a PP either before V-final or after V-final. We coded the data for the variables grammatical complexity and discourse status, as previous research has shown that these have a significant impact on different kinds of constituent order phenomena (e.g., Arnold et al. 2000; Hawkins 1994; Wasow 2002; Van Bergen & De Swart 2010). Although these factors have already been described in earlier research into PP placement in Dutch (Jansen 1978), a simultaneous comparison has not yet been conducted. The effect of both variables will be analyzed and interpreted by means of a binary logistic regression model. Keywords:   Dutch, PP placement, translated vs. original texts, grammatical complexity, discourse status, logistic regression analysis  References: Arnold, J. E., T. Wasow, A. Losongco & R. Ginstrom (2000). Heavyness versus newness: The effects of structure complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering. Language 76 (1). 28-55  Hawkins, J. A. (1994). A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Jansen, F. (1978). Hoe krijgt een spreker zijn woorden op een rijtje? Taalgebruiksaspekten van de ‘PP over V’ konstruktie. In: J. G. Kooij (ed.) Aspekten van de woordvolgorde in het Nederlands. Leiden: Vakgroep Nederlandse Taal- & Letterkunde. 70-104. Macken, L., O. Declercq & H. Paulussen (2011) Dutch Parallel Corpus: a Balanced Copyright-Cleared Parallel Corpus. META 56(2)   Olohan M. & M. Baker (2000). Reporting that in translated English: evidence for subconscious processes of explicitation? Across Languages and Cultures 1(2): 141-158. Van Bergen, G & P. De Swart (2010). Scrambling in spoken Dutch: Definiteness versus weight as determinants of word order variation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 6-2. 267-295. Wasow, T. (2002). Postverbal behavior. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.  

Grammatical complexity versus discourse status as determinants of PP placement in original and translated Dutch

https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/2065105/file/2065874

Grammatical complexity versus discourse status as determinants of PP placement in original and translated Dutch

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Ghent University Academic Bibliography