This a chapter for the Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare. It deals with the theory of fairness applied to situations when individuals are partly responsible for their characteristics.fairness, responsibility, equal opportunity, compensation, handicap, talent, effort

François Maniquet

Marc Fleurbaey

English

Research Papers in Economics

1981b, “On the possibility of “fair” collective choice rule”,

1981b, “What is equality? Part 2: Equality of resources”,

1985a, “Equality of talent”,

1995c, “The requisites of equal opportunity”,

1995d, “Three solutions for the compensation problem”,

1997a, “Equitable opportunities in economic environments”,

1997b, “Equalizing opportunities through public education when innate abilities are unobservable”,

2002b, “Equality of opportunity: A progress report”,

2004a, “Liberty and distribution: Macrojustice from social freedom”,

A class of fair distribution rules à la Rawls and Sen”,

A Contribution to the Theory of Distributive Justice,

A diﬃculty in the concept of fairness”,

A local independence condition for characterization of the Walras rule”,

A note on interpersonal comparability and the theory of fairness”,

A pragmatic theory of responsibility for the egalitarian planner”,

A problem of rights arbitration in the Talmud”,

A reﬁnement and extension of the no-envy concept”,

A revised concept of distributional equity”,

A study of choice correspondences in economies with a variable number of agents”,

A theory of justice,

A utilitarian approach to the concept of equality in public expenditures”,

An equal-opportunity approach to the allocation of international aid”,

An equal-right solution to the compensation-responsibility dilemma”,

An exploration in the theory of optimum income taxation”,

Average cost pricing vs serial cost sharing: An axiomatic comparison”,

Axiomatic cost and surplus sharing”,

Balanced egalitarian redistribution of income”,

Basic income versus wage subsidies: Competing instruments in an optimal tax model with a maximin objective”,

Brute luck, option luck, and equality of initial opportunities”,

Capabilities and utilities”,

Chance and justice: Social policies and the Harsanyi-Vickrey-Rawls problem”,

Characterizations of bargaining solutions in production economies with unequal skills”,

Choice of compensation policy for disabilities”,

Collective Choice and Social Welfare,

Commodities and Capabilities,

de gaer 1994, “Equality of opportunity and intergenerational transmission processes”,

de gaer 2003, “Equality of opportunity versus equality of opportunity sets”, forth. in Social Choice and Welfare.

Decentralizing equality of opportunity”,

Devooght 1998, “The empirical acceptance of compensation axioms”,

Devooght 2003, “Responsibility-sensitive fair compensation in diﬀerent cultures”,

Egalitarian opportunities”,

Egalitarianism against the veil of ignorance”,

Egalitarisme et responsabilité: Une investigation expérimentale”,

Equal division, eﬃciency, and the sovereign supply of labor”,

Equal endowments as undominated diversity”,

Equal liberty”, mimeo Conseil Général des Ponts et Chaussées,

Equal opportunity and intergenerational mobility: Going beyond intergenerational income transition matrices”,

Equality among responsible individuals”,

Equality and equal opportunity for welfare”,

Equality and responsibility”, European Economic Review 39: 683-689. F l e u r b a e yM

Equality of Opportunity,

Equality of resources implies equality of welfare”,

Equality of resources revisited”,

Equitable opportunities: An axiomatic approach”,

Equitable opportunities: An extension”,

Equity and the informational basis of collective choice”,

Equity in exchange economies”,

Equity, Arrow’s conditions and Rawls’ diﬀerence principle”,

Equity, envy and eﬃciency”,

et alii 2003, “To what extent do ﬁscal regimes equalize opportunities for income acquisition among citizens?”,

Existence of fair allocations in economies with production”,

Extended social ordering function for rationalizing fair allocation rules as game forms in the sense of Rawls and Sen”,

Fair allocation with unequal production skills: The solidarity approach to compensation”,

Fair allocations in large economies”,

Fair income tax,” forth. in Review of Economic Studies.

Fair orderings when agents have unequal production skills,”

Fairness and envy”,

Fundamental incompatibility among economic eﬃciency, intergenerational equity, and sustainability in production economies with the ‘global warming’ type of negative externality”,

Game-theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud”,

Generalized Gini indices of equality of opportunity”,

Gevers 2002, “Social welfare functionals and interpersonal comparability”,

Help the low-skilled or let the hard-working thrive? A study of fairness in optimal income taxation”, forth.

How demanding should equality of opportunity be, and how much have we achieved?”,

Implementability and horizontal equity imply NoEnvy”,

Joint Ownership of a convex technology :

Justice et équité,P a r i s :E d .d uC

La présence d’envie: comment s’en accommoder?”,

Large indivisibles: An analysis with respect to price equilibrium and fairness”,

Le contrat social libéral,P a r i s

Liberalism, distributive subjectivism, and equal opportunity for welfare”,

Liberty and Justice: Essays in Political Theory,v o l .2 ,O x f o r d :O x f o r d

Luck egalitarianism and prioritarianism”, Ethics 110: 339-349. A r r o wK

Maniquet 1996a, “Fair allocation with unequal production skills: The No-Envy approach to compensation”,

Maniquet 1996b, “Utilitarianism versus fairness in welfare economics,” forthcoming

Compensation and responsibility

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Research Papers in Economics