Effect of Prolonged Non-Traumatic Noise Exposure on Unvoiced Speech Recognition

Abstract

Animal models in the past decade have shown that noise exposure may affect temporal envelope processing at supra-threshold levels while the absolute hearing threshold remains in the normal range. However, human studies have failed to consistently find such issue due to poor control of the participants’ noise exposure history and the measure sensitivity. The current study operationally defined non-traumatic noise exposure (NTNE) to be noise exposure at dental schools because of its distinctive high-pass spectral feature, non-traumatic nature, and systematic exposure schedule across dental students of different years. Temporal envelope processing was examined through unvoiced speech recognition interrupted by noise or by silence. The results showed that people who had systematic exposure to dental noise performed more poorly on tasks of temporal envelope processing than the exposed people. The effect of high-frequency NTNE on temporal envelope processing was more robust inside than outside the spectral band of dental noise and was more obvious in conditions that required finer temporal resolution (e.g faster noise modulation rate) than in those requiring less fine temporal resolution (e.g. slower noise modulation rate). Furthermore, there was a significant performance difference between the exposed and the unexposed groups on tasks of spectral envelope processing at low frequency. Meanwhile, the two groups performed similarly in tasks near threshold. Additional analyses showed that factors such as age, years of musical training, non-dental noise exposure history and peripheral auditory function were not able to explain the variance of the performance in tasks of temporal or spectral envelope processing. The findings from the current study support the general assumptions from animal models of NTNE that temporal and spectral envelope processing issues related to NTNE likely occur in retro-cochlear sites, at supra-threshold levels, and could be easily overlooked by clinically routine audiologic screening

    Similar works