research

Thermal inertia of hollow wall blocks: actual behavior and myths

Abstract

In the context of growing requirements to save energy in buildings and high objectives for Net Zero Energy Buildings (NZEBs) in Europe, strong emphasis is placed on the thermal performance of building envelopes, and in particular on thermal inertia to save cooling energy. High thermal inertia of outer walls leads to a mitigation of the daily heat wave, reducing cooling peak load and energy demand. Moreover, building envelopes with high heat capacity act as heat storages, increasing the effectiveness of natural ventilation for thermal comfort through a night-day energy shifting. Even though there are some papers available in the open literature on dynamic heat transfer through hollow bricks, yet common calculation methods are applicable to homogeneous layers only. That is the case of ISO 13786 regulation "Thermal performance of building components - Dynamic thermal characteristics - Calculation methods", for example. On the other hand, hollow blocks are very commonly used in building envelopes. Thus, available methods are not suitable for prediction of dynamic thermal performances. On the other hand, the widely common assumption that high mass means high thermal inertia leads to the use of higher mass blocks or bricks. Yet, numerical and experimental studies on thermal inertia of hollow envelope-components have not confirmed this general assumption, even though no systematic analysis has been found in the open literature. In this framework, numerical simulations of the thermal performance of hollow bricks have been done with a specifically-developed finite-difference computational code. Three common basic shapes with different void fraction and thermal properties have been analyzed with a triangular pulse solicitation, in order to highlight the relevance of front mass and other parameters on the thermal inertia, measured through heat wave delay. Results show that wall front mass is often misleading as thickness, number of cavities and clay thermal diffusivity are more important

    Similar works