Comparing Bayesian and frequentist estimators in the exchangeable case

Abstract

Consider a sample of observations (X1,...Xn) with density fQ(X1,...,Xn)= [integral operator][Theta]Pi=1nf[Theta](Xi)dQ([Theta]), where f[theta](x) is a known model, [theta] [set membership, variant] [Theta], a finite-dimensional space, and Q is an unknown distribution ranging over a suitable set of probability distributions over [Theta]. This is the most interesting case of exchangeable observations. The problem of estimating h(Q), a real-valued function of Q of interest, is considered, both from a Bayesian and a frequentist perspective. In particular, it is proved that the uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator (UMVUE) for h([theta]) is the UMVUE for h(Q) = EQ[h([theta])]. Finally, following the idea in the paper by Samaniego and Reneau (1994), Bayesian and frequentist estimators of h(Q) are compared.Exchangeable observations Bayesian estimators Uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimators Mean squared error

    Similar works

    Full text

    thumbnail-image

    Available Versions

    Last time updated on 06/07/2012