Малопродуктивні моделі творення закарпатських мікротопонімів басейну річки Ужа (Low productivity in relation to creating of microtoponyms of nhe Uzh river basin)

Abstract

Статтю присвячено дослідженню особливостей функціонування малопродуктивних моделей творення мікротопонімів басейну річки Ужа Закарпатської області; аналізуються структурно-семантичні ознаки базових назв. З᾽ясовано, що кількісно переважають мікротопоніми, утворені за зразком «двочленна / тричленна назва > одночленна / двочленна назва», «антропонім / топонім + форманти», найменшою є група онімів, що презентує модель «апелятив + неузгоджене означення». (The article deals with the scientific research concerning the functioning of patterns with low productivity in relation to creating of microtoponyms of the Uzh river basin in Transcarpathian region. It has been established a model «appelative + inconsistent attribute (preposition + microtoponym / anthroponym) > binomial name» which functions for a relatively short period of time and is often elliptical. Most of the non-elliptical microtoponyms are used to define geographic objects that have appeared recently. Microtoponyms based on the pattern «appelative + inconsistent attribute (anthroponym in the genitive case) > binomial / trinomial name» are represented by the derivatives with the suffix -ат(а) orignated from anthroponyms. These derivatives express the meaning of possession. It has been determined that the nominative possibilities identified ten microtoponymic groups organized by means of nominativization. Productivity of the model depended, primarily, on the combining abilities of the preposition and potential resources of basic microtoponyms. What is more, it has been singled out the group of microtoponyms of the Uzh river basin which was formed following the pattern «anthroponym / toponym / microtoponym + formant > monomial name in singular / plural.» The analyzed group also contains the names orignated from the anthroponyms with the following suffixes: -их-а, -ан’-а, -ôвиц′ and others. The research showed that microtoponyms which were based on the pattern «binomial / trinomial name > monomial / trinomial name», «anthroponym / toponym + formant» prevail in number. The group of microtoponyms which represents the model «appelative + inconsistent attribute» is the smallest one.