Susanto, Novie

Triadi putranto, Thomas

English

Diponegoro University Institutional Repository

2/28/2019 Faculty of Engineering Diponegoro University Mail - Fwd: Review Results - : Int J of GEOMATEhttps://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=0460b4c773&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1592011261295181565&simpl=msg-f%3A1592011… 1/1Thomas Putranto <putranto@ft.undip.ac.id>Fwd: Review Results - : Int J of GEOMATE 1 messageZakaria <zakaria@bio.mie-u.ac.jp> Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 5:57 PMTo: novie.susanto@ft.undip.ac.id, Thomas Putranto <putranto@ft.undip.ac.id>Dear Authors,Thanks for your kind contribution. We have reviewers' comments on your paper (attached). Please send therevised paper by maximum of 4 days upon receiving this email. Please send response to reviewers by authors inseparate file. An example of “response to reviewers by authors” is attached. Please use the following link:http://www.geomatejournal.com/revisedBest regards. --Dr. Zakaria Hossain (Ph.D. Kyoto Univ.)Professor, Mie University, JapanEditor-in-Chief, Int. J. of GEOMATEDirector, Sci. Eng. & Env. Int. Conf.General Secretary, GEOMATE Int. Soc.zakaria@bio.mie-u.ac.jpsociety@geomate.orgconference@geomate.orgeditor@geomatejournal.comhttp://www.koku.bio.mie-u.ac.jp/http://www.geomate.org/http://www.confsee.com/http://www.geomatejournal.com/       2 attachmentsExample-Response to reviewer by Author.pdf 19K73578.pdf 32K2/28/2019 Faculty of Engineering Diponegoro University Mail - Fwd: Final Galley proof for Issue Number: 47https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=0460b4c773&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1593727242984679929&simpl=msg-f%3A1593727… 1/1Thomas Putranto <putranto@ft.undip.ac.id>Fwd: Final Galley proof for Issue Number: 47 1 messageZakaria <zakaria@bio.mie-u.ac.jp> Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 4:32 PMTo: novie.susanto@ft.undip.ac.id, Thomas Putranto <putranto@ft.undip.ac.id>Dear Authors, Attached herewith, please see the galley proof paper for final checking. Please note that this is the final correctionand after this checking, you will not be able to change anything later on. As many grammatical errors found, wehave done the following corrections:1. Grammar corrected by Zakaria2. Formatting correction done by Zakaria3. Figures and space including title of figures and sections corrected  by Zakaria Please do not change the format if any correction. We accept minor correction only (no major corrections). Pleasesend PDF version (Publishable Format including all journal information such as page numbers, vol, and issuenumber, date of received, revised and accepted etc.) of your galley proof paper by 4 days from the date of thisemail using the following link.http://www.geomatejournal.com/galley We accept online submission only. Please make sure that your copyright must be signed by all authors (samplesattached). Best regards. Prof. Dr. Zakaria HossainEditor-in-ChiefInternational Journal of GEOMATE  3 attachmentssample-signed by all authors.pdf 668K170-177-73578-Novie-July-2018.docx 587K170-177-73578-Novie-July-2018.pdf 225KSubmission DatePaper ID numberPaper Titlei. Originalityii. Qualityiii. Relevanceiv. Presentationv. RecommendationTotal (sum of i to v)General commentsMandatory changesReviewer's E-mail (Removebefore sendiing to author)GEOMATE Journal Review and Evaluation2018-01-30 09:04:3873578STAKEHOLDER INTERACTIONS MODEL OF GROUNDWATERMANAGEMENT IN SEMARANG CITY/INDONESIA3344418The paper is so simple. Need to improve in several aspect ..See the mandatorychange.Why this study use RACI to formulate a model of stakeholder interaction relatedto groundwater management in Semarang City and map it ? As the authors saidthere were several method than can be used. Please give a brief explanation.The total respondent only 27 people. Is it enough? How you can said that therespondent can be used to represent the result of this research? The author alsodo not mention the characteristic of respondent. Please make a table thatsummarize the characteristic of respondent, include age, the position andgender, etc. Only 23 community members and 4 person from industrial managers What asampling technique you used to select them. Random? It is not clear. And fromwhat regiion, since there are so meany region in Semarang city. Why you selectthat region? It is also not clearYou only invite 23 and 4 person, or more? are they not giving a good respon toyou? It is no t clear. Table 2 start with low but table 3 start with high.. you should more consistent. Based on your study, any implication managerial for each stakeholder. Pleasemake it clearly. What is the limitation of study and what is your suggestion for thefuture research from the result of this study. I think for journal, you should add more reference for international journal. 

Stakeholder Interactions Model of Groundwater Management in Semarang City Indonesia_Peer Review

http://eprints.undip.ac.id/68646/2/Email_Correspondency_Jurnal_C5.pdf

Stakeholder Interactions Model of Groundwater Management in Semarang City Indonesia_Peer Review

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Diponegoro University Institutional Repository