The attribution of the paintings to Mantegna has been the subject of many controversial discussions among art historians, even though today it seems that, in spite of the fact that the paint surfaces were already badly cleaned and varnished since the beginning of the nineteen century, both paintings can be attributed to the last period of Mantegna’s painting activity.
Therefore, with the purpose to complement the historical studies with the results of scientific examinations, the two paintings have been analysed in situ with the use of non-invasive portable analytical techniques, such as digital multi spectral scanner imaging system and X-Ray Fluorescence. It has been hence possible to evaluate
the state of conservation, study applied artistic technique, distinguish and locate past restoration interventions and analyze colour
and pigments. This has been particularly done by complementing
the chemical information gathered through the use of XRF with
the false-colour IR technique.
The first analytical results seem to confirm that both canvas paintings have been prepared in the usual way with layers of gesso; the contemporary presence of elements such as Fe, Si, Mn and Al can be associated with the use of umber mixed with red ochre pigments.
Mantegna was a supremely confident draughtsman and there
is no evidence in his underdrawings of the use of any aids for
the reproductions of cartoons or the enlargements of studies on paper. Instead, he seems to have drawn directly on the gesso making his
first marks with a brush and very diluted carbon black ink, perhaps guided by a smaller scale sketch on paper. Once the placement of
the main features was settled, Mantegna developed the underdrawing using a darker more pigmented liquid material still applied with a brush and contours were defined with broad, thick and fluent lines which have been also painted at sight. The modelling of forms has been achieved at the level of painted surfaces which seems to be a further indication of Mantegna’s late painting production.
All these features seem to be present in both paintings.
Particular attention was paid to the understanding of the material composition of the flesh paints. In fact, even though their composition resulted to be composed of lead white with different proportions of vermilion, they show different flesh tonalities such
as the case of St Joseph and Zacharias and Christ and St John
in The Families of Christ and St John the Baptist (under the name of Holy Family). To this regard the presence of possible pigment deterioration processes which may have taken place in the past are presented and discussed