We report exploitation of ablation cooling, a concept well-known in rocket design, to remove materials, including metals, silicon, hard and soft tissue. Exciting possibilities include ablation using sub-microjoule pulses with efficiencies of 100-mJ pulses. © OSA 2015

Akcaalan Ö.

Aşik, M.D.

Elahi P.

Ilday F.Ö.

Kalaycioglu H.

Kerse, C.

Kesim, D.K.

Yavaş, S.

Yavuz, K.

Çetin, B.

Bilkent University Institutional Repository

AF2A.5.pdf Advanced Solid State Lasers Conference © OSA 2015Ablation-cooled material removal at high speedwith femtosecond pulse burstsC. Kerse1,∗, H. Kalaycioglu2, P. Elahi2, Ö. Akcaalan2, S. Yavaş3, M. D. Aşik4, D. K.Kesim1, K. Yavuz2, B. Çetin5, and F. Ö. Ilday1,21 Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Bilkent University, Ankara, 06800, Turkey2 Department of Physics, Bilkent University, Ankara, 06800, Turkey3 FiberLAST, A.Ş., Ankara, 06800, Turkey4 Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine Department, Hacettepe University, Ankara, 06800, Turkey5 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bilkent University, Ankara, 06800, Turkey∗ cankerse@ee.bilkent.edu.trAbstract: We report exploitation of ablation cooling, a concept well-known in rocket design,to remove materials, including metals, silicon, hard and soft tissue. Exciting possibilitiesinclude ablation using sub-microjoule pulses with efficiencies of 100-µJ pulses.OCIS codes: 140.3390, 060.1510, 320.7090Femtosecond pulses hold great promise for high-precision material and tissue processing. It is well-known that useof such pulse durations allows very precise and virtually thermal-damage free material removal under appropriateconditions. However, two drawbacks remain. The first is the limited ablation rates, which is particularly limiting forbiological tissue removal. The second is that at several microjoules, but often 10’s to 100’s of microjoules of pulseenergy are required. Regarding speed of ablation, the physics of the laser-material interaction precludes a straightfor-ward scaling up of the removal rate simply by sending pulses more frequently, since this leads to collateral damagedue to heat accumulation.Here, we exploit the same physics to circumvent this limitation. We apply rapid succession of ultrafast pulses froma burst-mode fibre laser to ablate the target before residual heat deposited by the previous pulse can diffuse away fromthe interaction region. In addition to being able to process thermally sensitive materials, such as brain tissue, at highspeed and without thermal damage, our approach reduces the required pulse energy by orders of magnitude, openingthe route to highly efficient material removal with oscillator-level pulse energies.For a long time, it was commonly assumed that heat effects are nearly completely eliminated through the use ofultrafast pulses. Heat damage can indeed occur during ultrafast pulse processing as a result of pulse-to-pulse accu-mulation of residual heat that is deposited around the border of the ablated region by each pulse. While deposition ofsome residual heat by each pulse is unavoidable, we present here a laser system that can catch much of this heat beforeit can diffuse beyond the volume to be ablated by the next incoming pulse by operating at very high repetition rates.This brings three interrelated advantages: (1) Most of the residual heat left by the previous pulse has not yet diffusedout of the volume to be ablated by the next pulse. Thus, each pulse targets an already hot volume, which lowers therequired ablation energy and peak power with numerous side benefits, such minimizing plasma shielding, reducingshock wave, cavitation bubble formation and self-focusing. In addition, the quantity of residual heat is proportional tothe pulse energy, thus reducing the magnitude of the problem to be solved. (3) Finally and most importantly, much ofthis residual heat is then carried away from the tissue in the form of ablated matter when ablated by the next pulse,reducing the build-up of heat from pulse to pulse. This is known as ablation cooling, which is very well known in thecontext of atmospheric entry of meteorites or reusable space rockets and has been routinely used in rocket design since1950’s. In the case of laser ablation of tissue, ablation is not continuous, but occurs only during and shortly after thepulses. In order to benefit from ablation cooling, the repetition rate must exceed a critical value, which scales with thethermal conductivity of the target material, and, in practice, at least tens of MHz.Given that the minimum pulse energy is substantial, continuous delivery of such repetition rates corresponds toprohibitively high average powers (which can amount to hundreds of watts). To overcome this bottleneck, we haveimplemented burst-mode operation, which was first demonstrated by R. Marjoribanks, et al. using picosecond solidstate lasers [1]. In burst mode, the laser produces packages of high-repetition-rate pulses, or bursts, which are repeatedat a much lower, adjustable frequency. In this work, we utilized fiber lasers developed in our laboratory [2].We demonstrate that the maximum levels of ablation per pulse energy reported using high pulse energies can beattained with much lower pulse energies with optimized burst parameters. After demonstrating this effect on siliconAF2A.5.pdf Advanced Solid State Lasers Conference © OSA 2015and copper (Fig. 1), we applied this approach to processing of various targets of medical interest, namely, dentine(as example of hard tissue), agar (representative of opthalmic tissue), cow eyes and mouse brain tissue (Fig 2.). In allof these experiments, we obtained excellent results with the burst mode. Specifically, we report thermal-damage-freeablation of brain tissue at 0.75 mm3/min, representing an order of magnitude improvement on previous results, alongwith a potential to increase ablation speed by two orders of magnitude. These results pave the way towards in vivooperation at medically relevant speeds, eventually delivered via flexible fibres to hard-to-reach targets.0 50 100 15002004006008001000Energy per Burst (µJ)Ablated Volume (µm3 )1730 MHz 864 MHz 432 MHz 216 MHz 108 MHz 25 MHz1 MHz 0 50 100 15002004006008001000Energy per Burst (µJ)Ablated Volume (µm3 )1730 MHz 864 MHz 432 MHz 216 MHz 108 MHz 25 MHz1 MHz 0 2 4 6 8 1000.050.10.15Pulse Energy (µJ)Ablated Atoms per Photon0 1 2 3 4 5 6Absorbed Pulse Energy (µJ)216 MHz108 MHz25 MHzdashed: 25 pulses per burstsolid:    15 pulses per burst0 2 4 6 8 1000.20.40.60.81Pulse Energy (µJ)Ablated Atoms per Photon0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1Absorbed Pulse Energy (µJ)216 MHz108 MHz1 MHzdashed: 25 pulses per burstsolid:    15 pulses per burst(a)(c) (d)(b)silicon target copper targetFig. 1. Ablation results obtained at various intra-burst repetition rates on silicon and copper targets.Ablated volume by a single pulse burst (25 pulses within the burst) at various intra-burst repetitionrates for (a) silicon and (b) copper targets. Ablation efficiency (number of atoms per incident photon)for select repetition rates for (c) silicon and (d) copper targets.Careful analysis of the ablation results on silicon and copper targets reveals several important features. First, inevery case tested, burst-mode operation is much more efficient than uniform-mode operation of the laser (Fig. 1aand 1b). The total ablated volumes, e.g., for copper per single pulse burst meet and even exceed the values reportedpreviously using uniform pulsed lasers at much higher fluence levels [3]. In other words, 25 individual pulses makingup a 150 microjoule burst ablate roughly as much material as a single 150 microjoule pulse. This changes completelythe requirements on laser technology for efficient ultrafast material processing.Second, we inspect the ablation efficiencies, shown in Fig. 1c and 1d in units of atoms ablated per laser photon.In each case, increasing number of pulses within a burst increases the efficiency. More importantly, going from 108MHz to 216 MHz, the efficiency difference is less for 25 pulse/burst than for 15 pulses/burst for a copper target. For asilicon target, 216 MHz is even more efficient until the highest energies. At any rate, differences in efficiency are verysmall. These data suggest strongly that roughly the same efficiencies can be maintained if intra-burst repetition rateis increased, while increasing simultaneously the number of pulses within the burst, and decreasing energy per pulse(keeping the burst energy constant). Currently, experiments are under way in our laboratory to test this expectation.If verified, the implication is that hundreds of sub-microjoule individuals pulses within a single burst can be about asefficient as a 100-microjoule single pulse.In conclusion, we report exciting results on processing of a large variety of materials, including various metalsAF2A.5.pdf Advanced Solid State Lasers Conference © OSA 2015(however, only copper is shown in Fig. 1), silicon, agar, dentine, brain and eye tissue. In all cases, burst-mode operationexcels, for which we provide a simple physical explanation. Results on non-biological targets are exciting in their ownright, required individual pulse energies can be decreased by orders of magnitude, which challenges the acceptedparadigm in terms of required pulse parameters. This, in turn, has major implications for the required laser technology.However, we are even more excited by results on biological targets, where we have achieved ablation rates of 0.75mm3/min for brain tissue. These results pave the way towards in vivo operation at medically relevant speeds, eventuallydelivered via flexible fibers to hard-to-reach targets.250 μm 250 μm(a) (b)250 μm 250 μm(c) (d)UNIFORM MODE BURST MODE(e) (f)Fig. 2. Burst-mode and uniform mode results obtained for various hard and soft tissue targets. Wenote that in all the comparisons, all lasers parameters are kept identical apart from the sequencingof the pulses (uniform or burst mode) to ensure fair comparison. Histological analysis of braintissue processed using (a) burst-mode and (b) uniform-mode operation of the laser, showing burst-mode ablation is free of thermal damage seen with uniform mode. Results of processing of dentineusing (c) burst-mode and (d) uniform-mode operation. Processing of agar using (e) burst-mode anduniform-mode operation, showing cleaner and deeper cuts with burst mode. Results of a preliminaryflap removal operation using burst-mode on cow eye.References1. M. Lapczyna, K. P. Chen, P. R. Herman, H. W. Tan, and R. S. Marjoribanks, “Ultra high repetition rate (133MHz) laser ablation of aluminum with 1.2-ps pulses,” Appl. Phys. A 69, 883886 (1999).2. H. Kalaycoglu, O. Akcaalan, S. Yavas, Y. B. Eldeniz, and F. O. Ilday, “Burst-mode Yb-doped fiber amplifiersystem optimized for low-repetition-rate operation,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 32, 900-906 (2015).3. H. Furukawa, M. Hashida, “Simulation on femto-second laser ablation,” Appl. Surf. Sci. 197, 114-117 (2002).

Ablation-cooled material removal at high speed with femtosecond pulse bursts

http://repository.bilkent.edu.tr/bitstream/11693/28197/1/Ablation-cooled%20material%20removal%20at%20high%20speed%20with%20femtosecond%20pulse%20bursts.pdf

Ablation-cooled material removal at high speed with femtosecond pulse bursts

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Bilkent University Institutional Repository