'Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists (RCOG)'
Doi
Abstract
Geographic isolation plays a pivotal role in speciation by restricting gene flow between populations
through distance or physical barriers. However, the speciation process is complex, influenced by the
interplay between dispersal ability and geographic isolation, as seen in "great speciators" – bird species
that simultaneously have broad island distributions but high levels of subspecific diversity. Comparing
genomic population differentiation in species that occupy both continental and island settings can reveal
the effects of different forms of geographic isolation and validate if the primary mechanism proposed to
catalyse a great speciator pattern, that is dispersal reduction following island colonisation, has occurred.
The highly diverse white-eye family Zosteropidae includes several great speciators, including the
silvereye (Zosterops lateralis), with 16 subspecies (11 occurring on islands), distributed on the Australian
continent and numerous southwest Pacific islands. We compared continental and island patterns of
divergence using whole genome and morphological data. Australian mainland populations showed low
genetic population structure, lack of isolation by distance patterns, and low morphological
diagnosability, suggesting the species’ dispersal propensity in a continental setting is sufficient to
overcome multiple forms of geographic barriers and large geographic distances. In contrast, except for
island populations less than 200 years old, most island populations were highly genomically structured
with clearer morphological diagnosability even if separated by relatively short geographic distances. The
inferred reduction of dispersal propensity in island situations is consistent with the proposed model of
great speciator formation on islands. Our phylogenomic analyses also allowed resolution of the
silvereyes’ evolutionary position, showing their relatively early emergence (~1.5 Mya) within the rapidly
radiating Zosteropidae, while population-level analyses demonstrated where morphological subspecies
and genomic data align, and disagree. However, the silvereye example also shows how uncertainties
about relationships remain when reconstructing evolutionary history in rapidly radiating groups, even
when whole genome data is available. Altogether, our results show how within-species genomic and morphological patterns measured over broad spatial scales and with varying geographic contexts can
help reveal when particular stages of speciation such as great speciators, are likely to emerge