research

Can we trust in numerical computations of chaotic solutions of dynamical systems ?

Abstract

From Laser Dynamics to Topology of Chaos, (celebrating the 70th birthday of Prof Robert Gilmore, Rouen, June 28-30, 2011), Ed. Ch. Letellier.Since the famous paper of E. Lorenz in 1963 numerical computations using computers play a central role in order to display and analyze solutions of nonlinear dynamical systems. By these means new structures have been emphasized like hyperbolic and/or strange attractors. However theoretical proofs of their existence are very di¢ cult and limited to very special linear cases. Computer aided proofs are also complex and require special interval arithmetic analysis. Nevertheless, numerous researchers in several fields linked to chaotic dynamical systems are confident in the numerical solutions they found using popular software and publish without checking carefully the reliability of their results. In the simple case of discrete dynamical systems (e.g. Hénon map) there are concerns about the nature of what a computer find out : long unstable pseudo-orbits or strange attractors? The shadowing property and its generalizations which ensure that pseudo-orbits of a homeomorphism can be traceable by actual orbits even if rounding errors are not inevitable are not of great help in order to validate the numerical results. Continuous dynamical systems (e.g. Chua, Lorenz, Rössler) are even more difficult to handle in this scope and researchers have to be very cautious to back up theory with numerical computations. We present a survey of the topic based on these, only few, but well studied models

    Similar works