Background/Objectives: The stability of dual mobility (DM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) is often attributed to reduced impingement incidence and a superior range of motion (ROM) compared to the corresponding values when standard implants are used. However, few studies have directly explored this. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to compare the incidence of impingement and the range of motion between standard and DM acetabular cups, whose diameters are suited to the same patient anatomy. Methods: One standard and two DM implants were virtually implanted into a pelvis using a previously developed geometric model. Joint motions, which were representative of seven dislocation-prone activities of daily living (ADLs), as well as walking, were applied to each device type at a range of cup orientations (inclination/anteversion). Conclusions: There were no placement positions that avoided impingement across all seven ADLs, regardless of cup construct type. A similar impingement incidence and ROM were observed for standard and DM constructs, although the consequences of impingement are potentially more serious for DM devices (metal–metal contact) than for standard constructs (metal–polyethylene contact). This finding contradicts the common notion that DM-THAs have a reduced impingement incidence and superior ROM, instead suggesting that their stability may be attributed to alternative mechanisms, such as increased jump distance
