International audienceThe Moon was once thought to be depleted in volatile elements. Analyses of the carbon contents of lunar volcanic glasses reveal that carbon monoxide degassing could have produced the fire-fountain eruptions from which these glasses were formed

AE Saal

Bruno Scaillet

DT Wetzel

F Gaillard

JW Delano

K Robinson

M Rutherford

M Sato

MG Nicholis

RM Canup

Scaillet, Bruno

HAL: Hyper Article en Ligne

Carbon in the Moon

Crossref

Nature Geoscience

HAL-INSU

Carbon in the MoonBruno ScailletTo cite this version:Bruno Scaillet. Carbon in the Moon. Nature Geoscience, Nature Publishing Group, 2015, 8,pp.747-748. <10.1038/ngeo2530>. <insu-01192577>HAL Id: insu-01192577https://hal-insu.archives-ouvertes.fr/insu-01192577Submitted on 16 Dec 2015HAL is a multi-disciplinary open accessarchive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-entific research documents, whether they are pub-lished or not. The documents may come fromteaching and research institutions in France orabroad, or from public or private research centers.L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, estdestine´e au de´poˆt et a` la diffusion de documentsscientifiques de niveau recherche, publie´s ou non,e´manant des e´tablissements d’enseignement et derecherche franc¸ais ou e´trangers, des laboratoirespublics ou prive´s.Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives 4.0International LicenseCarbon in the Moon Bruno Scaillet The Moon was once thought to be depleted in volatile elements. Analyses of the carbon contents of lunar volcanic glasses reveal that carbon monoxide degassing could have produced the fire-fountain eruptions from which these glasses were formed. Subject terms: Geochemistry, Inner planets, Volcanology The abundances and distributions of volatile elements in a planetary body at birth influence the outcome of its evolution. Volatile elements can influence the existence and operation of plate tectonics, determine the composition and evolution of the atmosphere, and are important for the potential emergence of life. Among the rocky bodies in our Solar System, the Moon has long been considered the archetypal example of a volatile-free body. Such a dry Moon is consistent with the hypothesis that it formed from the debris of a giant collision between the early Earth and a Mars-sized body1. However, the detection of water at terrestrial-like abundances in lunar volcanic glasses has overturned the notion of a volatile-depleted Moon2. Writing in Nature Geoscience, Wetzel et al.3 analytically determine the carbon contents of the same lunar glasses and find that the small, but detectable, abundances of carbon and the degassing patterns they display are similar to those of Earth's mid-ocean ridge basalts — further evidence that the Earth and Moon may share a common volatile source. The discovery in 2008 of water in the glassy volcanic products of eruptions that occurred on the Moon over 3 billion years ago challenged the long-held assumption of a volatile-free Moon2. Intriguingly, the lunar volcanic glasses contain hydrogen, fluorine, sulphur and chlorine at levels that all imply an origin from source magmas with similar volatile concentrations as parts of Earth's upper mantle2. Subsequent detection of water and other volatile elements in various types of lunar material supports a revised view of a Moon that contains at least some volatiles, although how much and how they are distributed is a matter of debate4. The lunar volcanic glasses are thought to be the product of fire-fountain eruptions5, in which a jet of basaltic lava erupts through a vent, spattering droplets of lava that cool quickly to form glass. The explosiveness of a fire-fountain eruption, such as those observed in present-day Iceland (Fig. 1), is due to the degassing of volatile species dissolved in the magma. On Earth, these volatile species are typically water or carbon dioxide. On the Moon, however, it is unlikely that water or the other volatile elements detected thus far in the lunar volcanic glasses would have degassed under conditions in the lunar upper mantle5. Furthermore, variations in the volatile contents in the glasses suggest that minimal hydrogen was lost during the early stages of degassing2.      Figure 1: A fire-fountain eruption in Iceland. : Explosive volcanism on Earth is typically driven by the degassing of H2O or CO2. Wetzel et al.3 suggest that lunar basalts were sourced from a mantle similar to that of Earth, except one that is more reduced. Instead of CO2, they find that CO is the dominant carbon-bearing species degassing and driving the lunar fire fountains.  Carbon is thought to be a more likely culprit for the trigger of the fire-fountain eruptions6. Carbon-bearing species in silicate melts, especially those that are reduced, are not very soluble and thus degas easily from silicate melts. However, due to past limitations of available analytical techniques, the concentration of carbon in lunar magmas has been poorly constrained. Wetzel et al.3 analysed the carbon concentrations of volcanic glasses and melt inclusions in samples from the Apollo 15 and Apollo 17 missions, taking advantage of analytical advances that have substantially reduced the limits on carbon detection. They find that the carbon and water contents both increase towards the centres of the glass beads, indicative of degassing processes. The melt inclusions, which were trapped within olivine crystals before eruption, should not have experienced volatile loss due to volcanic degassing. The carbon content of the melt inclusions — measured by Wetzel et al. to be about 50 ppm — are expected to closely resemble that of their source mantle. This carbon content is similar to that measured from terrestrial basalts at mid-ocean ridges, in agreement with previously reported H, F, S and Cl contents. Wetzel et al. then apply a terrestrial degassing model of carbon, oxygen and hydrogen species that they modify to calculate the solubility of these species at the pressures and temperatures of lunar magmas. They find that CO is initially the dominant gas species; with increasing degassing of CO, eventually H2 and H2O also become important. This degassing scenario is consistent with the variations of C and H contents measured across the volcanic glass beads, suggesting that the fire-fountain eruptions were driven primarily by CO degassing. Wetzel et al. suggest that the similarity in volatile contents may be the result of a common origin of the volatiles in the Earth and Moon, but this is not easy to explain by existing giant impact scenarios or what we know about the evolution of the Earth's interior. The authors compare the products of lavas erupted more than 3 billion years ago on the Moon to modern seafloor basalts, which have an upper mantle source undoubtedly influenced by billions of years of large-scale mantle geodynamics and plate tectonics. And, despite similar volatile contents, Earth's basalts contain ferric iron consistent with an oxidized mantle source7, whereas lunar samples collected by the various Apollo and Lunar missions are geochemically reduced and show a conspicuous absence of ferric iron8. One possible explanation for this discrepancy is that the magma erupted on the surface does not necessarily reflect the redox conditions of its source mantle, due to decompression during the eruption process9. A decompression-driven redox change has been proposed6, 10 for the same volcanic glasses analysed by Wetzel et al. In this model, graphite particles suspended in the melt are oxidized to form a CO-rich gas phase during decompression as the magma ascends10. Thus, the ascending magma is consequently more reduced than its source mantle material. Analyses of iron- and nickel-rich metallic blebs in the lunar volcanic glasses are consistent with this reduction mechanism10. However, none of the lunar glasses analysed so far contain graphite8. Wetzel et al.3 definitively show that carbon is present as a dissolved species in the erupted melt phase of lunar magmas, and suggest that there is sufficient dissolved carbon in lunar melts to drive fire-fountain eruptions5. Hence, graphite, if present, is not the sole source of carbon to drive degassing, nor is it necessarily required. Although Wetzel et al. do not definitively rule out graphite occurrence in lunar magmas, their findings suggest that the oxidation of graphite to CO may not explain the reduction of lunar basalts. Another mechanism is required to explain why the lunar volcanic glasses are reduced relative to mid-ocean ridge basalts, despite similar volatile contents. References Canup, R. M. & Asphaug, E. Nature 412, 708–712 (2001). Saal, A. E. et al. Nature 454, 192–195 (2008). Wetzel, D. T., Hauri, E. H., Saal, A. E. & Rutherford, M. J. Nature Geosci. 8, 755–758 (2015). Robinson, K. L. & Taylor, G. J. Nature Geosci. 7, 401–408 (2014). Rutherford, M. J. & Papale, P. Geology 37, 219–222 (2009). Sato, M. in Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 10, 311–325 (1979). Delano, J. W. Origins Life Evol. B 31, 311–341 (2001). Delano, J. W. J. Geophys. Res. 91, 201–213 (1986). Gaillard, F. & Scaillet, B. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 403, 307–316 (2014). Nicholis, M. G. & Rutherford, M. J. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 73, 5905–5917 (2009). 

Archive Ouverte en Sciences de l'Information et de la Communication

https://insu.hal.science/insu-01192577v1/document

Carbon in the Moon

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

HAL: Hyper Article en Ligne

Crossref

HAL-INSU

Archive Ouverte en Sciences de l'Information et de la Communication