Evaluating causal effects in a primary population of interest with unmeasured
confounders is challenging. Although instrumental variables (IVs) are widely
used to address unmeasured confounding, they may not always be available in the
primary population. Fortunately, IVs might have been used in previous
observational studies on similar causal problems, and these auxiliary studies
can be useful to infer causal effects in the primary population, even if they
represent different populations. However, existing methods often assume
homogeneity or equality of conditional average treatment effects between the
primary and auxiliary populations, which may be limited in practice. This paper
aims to remove the homogeneity requirement and establish a novel
identifiability result allowing for different conditional average treatment
effects across populations. We also construct a multiply robust estimator that
remains consistent despite partial misspecifications of the observed data model
and achieves local efficiency if all nuisance models are correct. The proposed
approach is illustrated through simulation studies. We finally apply our
approach by leveraging data from lower income individuals with cigarette price
as a valid IV to evaluate the causal effect of smoking on physical functional
status in higher income group where strong IVs are not available