The methods literature regarding sampling in qualitative research is characterized by important inconsistencies and ambiguities, which can be problematic for students and researchers seeking a clear and coherent understanding. Here, I will present insights about sampling in qualitative research derived from a systematic methods overview conducted of the literature from three research traditions: grounded theory, phenomenology, and case study. In this review, recently published in TQR, we identified and selected influential methods literature from each tradition using a purposeful and transparent procedure, abstracted textual data using structured abstraction forms, and used a multistep approach for deriving conclusions from the data. The findings are organized into eight topic sections corresponding to the major domains of sampling identified in the review process: definitions of sampling, usage of the term sampling strategy, purposeful sampling, theoretical sampling, sampling units, saturation, sample size, and the timing of sampling decisions. I will summarize how each topic is characterized in the literature selected for review, presenting our comparative analysis of important differences among research traditions, and our analytic conclusions for each topic