Diasporas and International Relations Theory

Abstract

In this article, we incorporate the study of diasporas into international relations (IR) theory by focusing on diasporas as independent actors who actively influence their homeland (kin-state) foreign policies. We argue that diasporic influences can best be understood by situating them in the theoretical space shared by constructivism and liberalism; two approaches that acknowledge the impact of identity and domestic politics on international behavior. We also maintain that the exploration of diasporic activities can enrich both constructivism and liberalism. First, diasporas identity-based motivations should be an integral part of the constructivist effort to explain the formation of national identities. Second, diasporic activities and influences in their homelands expand the meaning of the term domestic politics to include not only politics inside the state but also inside the people. For the liberal approach, this is a new fact in the Lakatosian sense of the word. We theorize that the extent of diasporic influence on homeland foreign policy is determined by three components that make up the balance of power between homelands and diasporas. We then test this theory by delving into the interaction between the newly established state of Armenia and its powerful diaspora, and by comparing this case with examples taken from the relations between Israel and diaspora Jews.We would like to thank the editor and the reviewers for their detailed and insightful comments on earlier drafts of the manuscript. Andrew Benett, Aharon Kleiman, Robert Lieber, and Tamara Wittes have contributed greatly to the shaping of our arguments. Barry Bristman and Julie Weise made valuable remarks on content and style. Finally, we thank Khachig T l lyan for sharing with us his unparalleled insights into the Armenian experience.