The original publication is available at www.springerlink.comPeer reviewedPostprin

Bain, Christine

Burr, Jennifer

Fraser, Cynthia

Glazener, Cathryn M A

Jenkinson, David

Jia, Xueli

Mowatt, Graham

International Urogynecology Journal

English

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS The aim of this study is to estimate efficacy and safety of mesh in surgery for uterine or vault prolapse. METHODS Seventeen electronic databases were searched for relevant studies that were published from 1980 onwards. RESULTS Fifty-four studies involving 7,054 women were included. For sacrocolpopexy (average follow-up 23 months), the risk of clinical recurrence ranged from 0% to 6%, persistent symptoms ranged from 3% to 31% and mesh erosion from 0% to 12%. For infracoccygeal sacropexy (average follow-up 13 months), the risk of clinical recurrence ranged from 0% to 25%, persistent symptoms from 2% to 21% and mesh erosion 0% to 21%. Limited evidence was available for sacrocolpoperineopexy and uterine suspension sling to draw reliable estimates. CONCLUSIONS Sacrocolpopexy was associated with a low risk of recurrence but with a relatively high risk of mesh erosion. Ranges of estimates for outcomes for other mesh techniques were wide

Jia, X

Glazener, Cathryn

Mowatt, G

Fraser, C

Bain, C

Burr, J

University of Birmingham Research Portal

Systematic review of the efficacy and safety of using mesh in surgery for uterine or vaginal vault prolapse

Introduction and hypothesis The aim of this study is to estimate efficacy and safety of mesh in surgery for uterine or vault prolapseMethods Seventeen electronic databases were searched for relevant studies that were published from 1980 onwardsResults Fifty-four studies involving 7,054 women were included. For sacrocolpopexy (average follow-up 23 months), the risk of clinical recurrence ranged from 0% to 6%, persistent symptoms ranged from 3% to 31% and mesh erosion from 0% to 12%. For infracoccygeal sacropexy (average follow-up 13 months), the risk of clinical recurrence ranged from 0% to 25%, persistent symptoms from 2% to 21% and mesh erosion 0% to 21%. Limited evidence was available for sacrocolpopenneopexy and uterine suspension sling to draw reliable estimatesConclusions Sacrocolpopexy was associated with a low risk of recurrence but with a relatively high risk of mesh erosion Ranges of estimates for outcomes for other mesh techniques were wide</p

University of St Andrews Research Portal

Crossref

The original publication is available at www.springerlink.comPeer reviewe

Aberdeen University Research

(30-83) 3/144 NR Abdominal (open) Sacrocolpopexy Dacron graft (NR details); polytetrafluoroethylene, GoreTex (Amid type II), and other type of mesh (NR)

(37-124) Efficacy Safety Wu 2006[61] 212 66 (11) 0/212 212/0 Abdominal (open) Sacrocolpopexy Polyethylene tetraphalate, Mersilene (Amid type III); polypropylene (NR trade name); or Gore-Tex NR 15m (0.3-121) Safety

2.5y (1-5.5) Efficacy Safety Lo 1998[10]

36m (0-74) Efficacy Safety Bradley 2007[36] 305 NR NR NR Abdominal (open) Sacrocolpopexy Non-absorbable synthetic, xenograft, autologous or cadaveric fascia lata Anti-incontinence: 148/305 1y Efficacy Safety Culligan

4y (1-13) Efficacy Safety Higgs 2005b[46] 148 58 (10) 24/123 NR Abdominal (open) Sacrocolpopexy Combined mesh, polyproglactine and prolene 1 :1, Vypro; fascia lata; polypropylene, Prolene; polyethylene tetraphalate,

51m (12-115) Efficacy Safety Griffis 2006[23]

A new technique of uterine suspension to pectineal ligaments in the management of uterovaginal prolapse.

A prospective randomized study comparing posterior IVS and sacrospinous suspension for the surgical treatment of uterine or vaginal vault prolapse.

A randomised controlled trial comparing abdominal and vaginal prolapse surgery: effect on urogenital function.

A randomized controlled trial comparing fascia lata and synthetic mesh for sacral colpopexy.

A retrospective comparison of abdominal sacrocolpopexy with Burch colposuspension versus sacrospinous fixation with transvaginal needle suspension for the management of vaginal vault prolapse and coexisting stress incontinence.

A survey of the complications of vaginal prolapse surgery performed by members of the Society Of Gynecologic Surgeons.

a,b.c Results from the two arms of one/two/four studies were combined 32 Table 2 Median and ranges of mesh erosion rates for sacrocolpopexya,b No. study n/N (%) Median (range) Non-absorbable synthetic mesh

Abdominal colposacropexy and sacrospinous ligament suspension for severe uterovaginal prolapse: A comparison.

Abdominal high uterosacral colpopexy and abdominal sacral colpopexy with mesh for pelvic organ prolapse.

Abdominal sacral colpopexy in 163 women with posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse and enterocele. Evolution of operative techniques.

Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a prospective randomized study.

Abdominal sacral suspensions: analysis of complications using permanent mesh.

Abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vault prolapse without burial of mesh: a case series.

Abdominal-retroperitoneal sacral colpopexy for the correction of vaginal prolapse.

Abdominovaginal sacral colpoperineopexy: patient perceptions, anatomical outcomes, and graft erosions.

Anterior intravaginal slingplasty tunneller device for stress incontinence and posterior intravaginal slingplasty for apical vault prolapse: a 2-year prospective multicenter study.

Bowel symptoms in women 1 year after sacrocolpopexy.

Coker A

Comparison of effectiveness of vaginal and abdominal routes in treating severe uterovaginal or vault prolapse.

Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse.

Conservation of the prolapsed uterus is a valid option: medium term results of a prospective comparative study with the posterior intravaginal slingoplasty operation.

Conservative management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004014.pub3.: 4. Systematic review of the efficacy and safety of using mesh or grafts in surgery for uterine or vaginal vault prolapse

Efficacy Safety Hardiman 1996[24]

Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.

for Health and Clinical Excellence,

Haberal A

High complication rate identified in sacrocolpopexy patients attributed to silicone mesh.

Incidence and management of abdominal sacrocolpopexy mesh erosions.

Infracoccygeal sacropexy.

IVS Tunneller Anti-incontinence: NR Hysterectomy: 3/7 Efficacy: 6w Safety: 5m (2-11) Safety 42 ID N Age, y Uterine/ vault Primary/ secondary Intervention route Technique Mesh/graft Anti-incontinence procedures Follow up Outcomes Petros

Laparoscopic versus robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse.

laparoscopic) D, abdominal (open) A, sacrocolpopexy B, sacrocolpopexy C, sacrocolpopexy D, sacrocolpopexy A, polypropylene,

LAS study - a randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse.

Long term review of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

Long-term outcome of abdominal sacrocolpopexy using xenograft compared with synthetic mesh.

Longterm success of abdominal sacral colpopexy using synthetic mesh.

Mechanical devices for pelvic organ prolapse in women.

Mesh erosion and abdominal sacrocolpopexy: A comparison of prior, total, and supracervical hysterectomy.

Mesh erosion in abdominal sacral colpopexy with and without concomitant hysterectomy.

Morbidity associated with posterior intravaginal slingplasty for uterovaginal and vault prolapse. Arch Gynecol Obstet 276:499-504. 25 46. Higgs

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2009). Infracoccygeal sacropexy using mesh for uterine prolapse repair.

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2009). Insertion of mesh uterine suspension sling (including sacrohysteropexy) for uterine prolapse repair.

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2009). Sacrocolpopexy using mesh for vaginal vault.

NR 13m Efficacy Oliver 2006[52] 14 73 (18) 7/7 NR Vaginal Modified infracoccygeal sacropexy with uterine preservation

NR 43m (1m-17y) Efficacy Safety Timmons 1992[59] 163 58 (19-81) 163/3 NR Abdominal (open) Sacrocolpopexy Fascial lata (NR trade name); polyethylene tetraphalate,

Observational data collection of surgical outcomes in the treatment of vaginal prolapse with AMS products. ClincialTrials.gov Identifier NCT00388947.

Perioperative complications in abdominal sacrocolpopexy and vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation procedures. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18:257-261. 22 21. Govier

Pigne A

Posterior intravaginal slingplasty (infracoccygeal sacropexy) for severe posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse--a preliminary report on efficacy and safety.

Posterior intravaginal slingplasty (infracoccygeal sacropexy) in the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse.

Posterior intravaginal slingplasty for vaginal prolapse.

Prospective randomised study to compare colposacropexy and Mayo McCall technique in the correction of severe genital central prolapse.

Randomized controlled trial comparing acellular collagen biomesh (Pelvisoft) to polypropylene mesh (Pelvitex) for sacral colpopexy.

Randomized multicentric study to treat prolapse after hysterectomy with Amreich procedure or total Prolift procedure.

Sacrocolpopexy--a report on 262 consecutive operations.

Sacrohysteropexy with synthetic mesh for the management of uterovaginal prolapse.

Sacrospinous vault suspension and abdominal colposacropexy: success rates and complications.

Shortterm results and long-term patients' appraisal of abdominal colposacropexy for treatment of genital and vaginal vault prolapse.

Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Issue 3.

Surgical outcome of abdominal sacrocolpopexy with synthetic mesh versus abdominal sacrocolpopexy with cadaveric fascia lata.

Synthetic sling for genital prolapse in young women.

Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking systematic reviews in health care (2009). Centre for Reviews and Dissemination,

Table 2 Median and ranges of mesh erosion rates for sacrocolpopexy a,b No. study n/N (%) Median (range) Non-absorbable synthetic mesh

The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.

Tissue Fixation System posterior sling for repair of uterine/vault prolapse -- a preliminary report.

Total abdominal hysterectomy at abdominal sacrovaginopexy - a comparative-study.

Treatment of stress and mixed urinary incontinence and vaginal vault prolapse.

Uterus preservation in surgical correction of urogenital prolapse.

Vaginal mesh erosion after abdominal sacral colpopexy.

Vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy and laparoscopic sacral colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse.

Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation.

Vault prolapse II: Restoration of dynamic vaginal supports by infracoccygeal sacropexy, an axial day-case vaginal procedure.

y Uterine/ vault Primary/ secondary Intervention route Technique Mesh/graft Concomitant procedure Follow up (mean) Outcomes Non-randomised comparative studies Visco

y Uterine/ vault Primary/ secondary Intervention route Technique Mesh/graft Concomitant procedure Follow up (mean) Outcomes RCT Roovers 2004[12]

y Uterine/ vault Primary/ secondary Intervention route Technique Mesh/graft, trade name Concomitant procedure Follow up,

y Uterine/ vault Primary/ secondary Intervention route Technique Mesh/graft, trade name Concomitant procedure Follow up, mean Outcomes Case series Fedorkow

y Uterine/ vault Primary/ secondary Intervention route Technique Mesh/graft, trade name Concomitant procedure Follow up, mean Outcomes Gregory 2005[22]

y Uterine/ vault Primary/ secondary Intervention route Technique Mesh/graft, trade name Concomitant procedure Follow up, mean Outcomes UTERINE RCT (abs.)

University of St. Andrews - Pure

https://research-portal.st-andrews.ac.uk/en/researchoutput/systematic-review-of-the-efficacy-and-safety-of-using-mesh-in-surgery-for-uterine-or-vaginal-vault-prolapse(e0f5856e-bcf3-4720-a4a7-aa05b56ddd2c).html

Systematic review of the efficacy and safety of using mesh in surgery for uterine or vaginal vault prolapse

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

University of Birmingham Research Portal

University of St Andrews Research Portal

University of Birmingham Research Portal

Crossref

Aberdeen University Research

University of St. Andrews - Pure

University of St. Andrews - Pure