Sopilko, N.

Zhuravleva, E.

English

eLibrary National Mining University

Sopilko N., Zhuravleva E. People’s Friendship University of Russia  INCREASE OF ENTERPRISE COMPETITIVE ABILITY BY IN-TIME EQUIPMENT MODERNIZATION  Scientific – technological progress in conditions of megapolis brings certain tendencies in interaction of marketing environment and rival industrial enterprises activity. To increase competitive ability industrial enterprises need to substitute out - of - date products. In this situation the state plays the main role, for example, its housing and public utilities reforming develops competitive environment in this field. The principle of cost minimization overlords in housing and public utilities, causing many dangerous tendencies. As a rule, citizens pay for household waste scavenging, but the state has also to subsidize this process. Constant budget dependence leads to spottiness, low investment activity and vague infrastructure development. In long term competitive ability of organizations scavenging household waste depends on time. From one hand, such an organization should be competitive for a long period of time, from the other hand, it is almost impossible to keep a constant level of competitive ability because of a great number of contradictory factors. Being influenced by external factors, such as scientific – technological progress and competition in the field, competitive ability of an organization could become worse, if necessary steps, such as in – time modernization or fund renewal,  are not made. The authors analyzed cost structure of the organization, scavenging household waste in SWAD of Moscow (Cheryomushky). It was found out that refuse receptacle park service costs was 20%. It can’t help influencing its technical – economic rates, life cycle duration and competitive ability level. In this situation it is necessary to reduce costs by in – time modernization and equipment replacement, its optimal service and maintenance with consideration of external factors influence and human resources. Any equipment has its individual maintenance cost. The system of cost consideration should be provided with the information about unsuitable refuse receptacles, unprofitable maintenance and proper refuse receptacles.  To solve this task we used the method of equipment replacement term on the basis of maintenance cost consideration and of the field marketing research. We analyzed and compared using of two types of refuse receptacles (0,8 and 1,1 m3) in Cheryomushky district. Initial data and calculation are presented in table 1, graphs 1,  2. Table 1 Calculation of minimum refuse receptacle (0,8/1,1 m3) maintenance total cost on the basis of work volume (HW) Year HW volume with progressive total, th. kg/year Annual maintenance cost, rub. Maintenance cost with progressive total, rub. Maintenance cost on  1 HW kg  to the end of the period, rub. f 1(x) Refuse receptacle cost to the end of the period, rub. Used capital to the end of the period, rub. Used capital on 1 HW kg to the end of the period, rub. f 2(x) Total cost on 1 HW kg,, rub. F(x) 1 54,8/75,3 0/0 0/0 0/0 4600/ 11300 1100/ 1700 20,07299/ 22,57636 20,07299/ 22,57636 2 109,6/ 150,6 500/100 500/100 4,562044/ 0,664011 3400/ 9900 2300/ 3100 20,9854/ 20,58433 25,54745/ 21,24834 3 164,4/ 225,9 1000/300 1500/ 400 9,124088/ 1,770695 2240/ 8600 3460/ 4400 21,04623/ 19,47764 30,17032/ 21,24834 4 219,2/ 301,2 1200/500 2700/ 900 12,31752/ 2,988048 1140/ 7600 4560/ 5400 20,80292/ 17,92829 33,12044/ 20,91633 5 274/ 376,5 1500/ 1000 4200/ 1900 15,32847/ 5,046481 200/ 7100 5500/ 5900 20,07299/ 15,67065 35,40146/ 20,71713 6 328,8/ 451,8 5700/ 1200 9900/ 3100 30,10949/ 6,861443 5700/ 7000 0/ 6000 0/ 13,28021 30,10949/ 20,14166 7 383,6/ 527,1 0/1500 9900/ 4600 25,80813/ 8,726997 4600/ 6900 1100/ 6100 2,86757/ 11,57276 28,6757/ 20,29975 8 438,4/ 602,4 500/2000 10400/ 6600 23,72263/ 10,95618 3400/ 5800 2300/ 7200 5,24635/ 11,95219 28,96898/ 22,90837 9 493,2/ 677,7 1000/ 2100 11400/ 8700 23,11436/ 12,83754 2240/ 4700 3460/ 8300 7,01541/ 12,24731 30,12976/ 25,08485 10 548/753 1200/ 2500 12600/ 11200 22,9927/ 14,87384 1140/ 3000 4560/ 10000 8,321168/ 13,28021 31,31387/ 28,15405    Gr.1. Cost and work volume (0,8 m3refuse receptacles) correlation  051015202530354054,8 109,6 164,4 219,2 274 328,8 383,6 438,4 493,2 5481 kg HB scavening cost, rubHW volume,th.kg/yearf1 for V=0,8f2 for V=0,8F for V=0,8 Gr.2. Cost and work volume (1,1 m3 refuse receptacles) correlation  According to the graphs 1, 2 European refuse receptacles have the longest life cycle and period of service, a 0,8 m3 refuse receptacle needs to be replaced every 5 years. Larger European refuse receptacles can serve longer than 8 years. Their maintenance costs less than maintenance of the others. So we can conclude that European refuse receptacles use is more profitable for this organization and provides high long – term competitive ability.  05101520253075,3 150,6 225,9 301,2 376,5 451,8 527,1 602,4 677,7 7531 kg HB scavening cost, rubHW volume,th.kg/yearf1 for V=1,1f2 for V=1,1F for V=1,1

INCREASE OF ENTERPRISE COMPETITIVE ABILITY BY IN-TIME EQUIPMENT MODERNIZATION

http://ir.nmu.org.ua//bitstream/123456789/2457/1/INCREASE%20OF%20ENTERPRISE%20COMPETITIVE%20ABILITY%20BY%20IN-TIME%20EQUIPMENT%20MODERNIZATION.pdf

INCREASE OF ENTERPRISE COMPETITIVE ABILITY BY IN-TIME EQUIPMENT MODERNIZATION

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

eLibrary National Mining University

eLibrary National Mining University