Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to develop a conceptual framework for understanding the
relationship between sexual dissidence, gender transgression and commercial hospitality. The paper
aims to argue that this can be used to examine how ideological assumptions about lesbian, gay,
bisexual and transgender (LGBT) consumers are mobilised in the production and consumption of
hospitality spaces.
Design/methodology/approach – The paper synthesises three theoretical strands: first, Turner’s
concepts of the liminoid and communitas; second, anthropological and socio-political conceptions of
myth and myth-making and third, Lefebvre’s spatial dialectic in the production of material, abstract
and symbolic space. It is argued that, when considered together, these theoretical approaches help to
understand the consumer experience, the ideological assumptions that underpin the experience, and
the processes through which the experience is constructed.
Findings – The holistic nature of the approach helps to analyse the relationship between
consumption and community ideologies at the micro level of personal interaction, the meso level of
group and organisational norms and the macro level of societal structures and agencies.
Research limitations/implications – The application of this framework in empirical research
can enhance our understanding of the role of commercial hospitality spaces in reproducing and
challenging particular ideological assumptions about LGBT consumers. It can inform the operational
strategies of commercial organisations. Furthermore, it can underpin a critical perspective on
management, which encourages practitioners to develop a sense of social responsibility towards the
communities of consumers they target.
Originality/value – Applying this framework to empirical research will also help one to understand
the nature of consumption and production within commercial hospitality