This poster will describe the history of the medical informatics course and the process of designing the case studies to fit into the new course management system, and will review the experiences of the librarians involved

Frisby, Anthony J

Kipnis, Daniel G

Mikita, Liz

Name not available

Multi-disciplinary medical case study development for first year medical students

Jefferson Digital Commons

Multi-disciplinary Medical Case Study Development For First Year Medical StudentsDan Kipnis, MSI; Anthony J. Frisby, PhD; Liz Mikita, MLS  Academic & Instructional Support & Resources, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia PAProject Goal To teach medical informatics skills to 232 first-year medical students using three online medical case studies developed with the collaboration of librarians, physicians, andinstructional designers.AbstractThe first formal medical informatics class atJefferson Medical College was created in 1987.Initially a traditional combination of lecturesand hands-on workshops, the course wasredesigned in 1996 to be a single two-hourlecture and 9 self-paced computer-basedlearning hours.In 2003 the Jefferson Medical College curriculum was changed from a traditionalcore study in the basic sciences during the firstyear to a system-based model. At this timemany free-standing courses such as medicalinformatics were integrated into a new course,Medical Practice for the 21st Century. The content presented in the new courseincluded medical informatics, medical ethics& humanities, biostatistics, health policy, andclinical history and examination skills. Each of these courses presented relevant content in synch with the body system functions of the new combined gross anatomy,histology, biochemistry, and physiologycourse, Human Form and Development.This poster will describe the history of themedical informatics course and the process ofdesigning the case studies to fit into the newcourse management system, and will reviewthe experiences of the librarians involved.History• The existing medical informatics course was a 2-hour presentation of concepts and ademonstration of the resources required to complete two required online case studies.• All first-year medical students were required to complete the two case studies on theirown within two weeks.• The case studies were developed using a combination of HTML and Oracle databaseprogramming, to track student progress and collect answers to the questions posedduring the case.• In Fall of 2003, the first-year curriculum changed to a systems based learning model ofeducation.• Five librarians were assigned four groups of 10-12 first-year medical students to facilitate in Problem-Based Learning exercises, some of which included library/journal research activities.• A third case study was designed for students to complete and the two existing caseswere redesigned to use the Blackboard Learning Community framework, with eachlibrarian offering personal feedback on responses.• Handouts and tutorials were developed to help students learn on their own.Process• The Dean of the Medical College challenged the Curriculum Committee to considercurrent, best teaching practices in medical education and change the curriculum if indicated.• The Library's Education Services Director is a member of the Curriculum Committeeand participates in course reviews and planning.  The committee saw an increasedneed for case-based learning experiences and believed the students would benefitfrom searching and evaluating medical literature.  Participation in this committee helpskeep the library and technology services in step with changes in UGME, GME and CME.• Librarians were assigned the role of “Library Liaisons" to support small groups duringthe case-based learning assignments.• We contacted and recruited faculty that were impressed with our library workshops tohelp us write case studies (PowerPoint, Reference Manager, etc.).ExperienceThe following proved to be challenges:• Finding physicians to develop credible case studies (we also got help from a nurse and dietician)• Adapting the case studies to a commercial course management system • Grading answers from 232 medical students • Providing personalized feedback to at least 3 out of 14 questions per student• Dealing with technical issues (such as access problems)• Developing questions/answers that could assess hard-to-measure search strategies andskills (and be graded automatically)• Taking into account that databases are a moving target (search results can change fromday to day)HTML/Oracle VersionShort self-evaluation quizzes helped students decide ifthey should take the optional tutorial before continuingwith the case.HTML/Oracle VersionStudent's responded to questions as the case story progressed. Library faculty reviewed student answers andprovided feedback for selected items.Test Question DilemmaIn the latest version of the course we only designed three questions (out of 14) to require manual grading by a librarian. Lessons Learned• Network to recruit physicians tohelp develop case studies (throughthe Curriculum Committee, by contacting physicians who attendedpast library workshops, etc.)• Improve the process of writing testquestions. Try to ask questionswithout ambiguity (or with less!)• Try to understand and manage thewide range of information literacyskills of the students • Meet the challenge of constructingrealistic case study exercises withthe limited range of features andimposed structure of a course management systemFaculty Contact InformationDan Kipnis, MSIEducation Services LibrarianThomas Jefferson University1020 Walnut St Suite 410Philadelphia, PA 19107215.503.2825dan.kipnis@jefferson.eduhttp://jeffline.jefferson.eduMay 2004Since there were a range of reasonable searchstrategies possible, we knew that this answerwould need to be examined and graded manually. But, when we created this question,we thought there was a clear single best answer,which would allow the course management system to grade it automatically.While we were expecting just the one correctresponse, the students performed searches inways we hadn't expected and got other (notquite as good, but still valid) results. The originalanswer was found using Practice Guideline as a “publication type” limit. Using PracticeGuideline as a MeSH term, however, returnedtwo totally different citations! Although thecourse management system had an onlinegradebook feature it could not automaticallyupdate grade results for items we changed toaccept alternative answers. We had to go backinto every student's record and manually assigncredit for the alternate answers.

http://jdc.jefferson.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1012&context=aisrpubs

Multi-disciplinary medical case study development for first year medical students

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Name not available

Jefferson Digital Commons